Oh and whoever brought up the Anti-ABM treaty, I know you know the treaty was written with an exit clause that either side could use and the US...
Are you a missile scientist then? Because I swear you're just some teenager that does mental copy-n-pasting of anti-american crap, but I might be...
cruise missiles from where? Their bombers that will tangle with our f-22s? And their submarine fleet is pitiful and probably tracked every inch out...
Cargo checks can be instituted over night, an ABM system takes years, maybe they'll put them both into effect the same day, then the ABM wouldn't be...
This assumes ABM tech won't improve, it's conceivable with funding decoy detection can be perfected, you sound similar to people who just 1 year...
It's not about the US nuking russia or china for no reason and hoping to survive, it's about making Russian and China scared that the US might do it...
Read Dub's link, it explains how the ABM could be used to block remaining missiles after a first strike against China or Russia. Another possibility...
dang dbl post.
The science channel recently had a show where a researcher used the 'fact' that T-rex's arms were too short to push it up if it tripped while running...
edit: Geez, I thought you meant ABM=offensive, so therefore bad like most people mean it, apologies, I just read your post too fast and saw something...
I've read in several books that particles attract through electromagnetic and nuclear (strong/weak) forces by exchanging particles (photons?). Let's...
Separate names with a comma.
