No, that's not what you said. You made specific allegations against an individual in a derisive tone. You accused them of only having an 8th grade...
Where do you see me not practicing what I preach? Unless you're assuming that me reference to Goedel was useles, you give no basis. If that's the...
Yep, the dictionary is wrong. That happens a lot actually. The people who write dictionaries are not experts in the fields of study. As a result...
The first line isn't valid, the argument is valid. "Valid" simply means that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. It...
No. The first premise does not imply that God created it. Try looking up "material conditional" and trying to learn a bit. Ah, so it's YOU who...
As I suspected, never taken a logic class, clueless about what Butte's point is, but would rather deride than understand. And yes, you don't...
Have you ever had a logic course in your life? Have you bothered to read the thread? Did you understand it? Or were you too busy being offended?...
The thread you linked is closed. Baum's book is a good introduction, but I think his first name is Robert isn't it?
98 percent of this thread is worthless. But on the subject of mathematical proofs of god, you might take a look at Godel's.
Just as an aside, The original post seems to be a mangling of the paradox of the ravens. This is an issue in figuring out what counts as evidence,...
This is indeed how it appears from the inside. However, if you'll take the time to read the research on the subject, you'll find it somewhat less...
Re: Order!! *Waving shotgun and pumping a shell into chamber* Order in the court! Then once again you have failed to read. No, begging the...
Too bad Jesus didn't say anything about not taking quotes out of context. You'll notice I did not say she was a hypocrite. I said: My favorite...
Actually, if you would learn to read, you would see that I didn't deny the existence of free will. I merely asked for evidence of it. However, you...
No, that's not a demonstration. If you just want physics to explain the bare hypothesis of free will, then it is trivial to do so. Free will...
You might try first showing that free will exists. Physics cannot explain how a Pegasus flies either. But this hardly counts against physics.
Ah, but see there's the problem. (same one I've been harping on in Zeno's paradox.) Defining infinity, or half of infinity inthis case, is not the...
Can you count halfway to infinity?
Uh, why? Again, why? Oh, and you've screwed up the distinciton between boundless and infinite. Huh? You've screwed up the distinction...
If you'll read my posts above, you should see what is meant.
Separate names with a comma.
