I've just expended considerably more effort merely on this response than you did in illuminating the content of those videos - which, together, run...
To iterate, lest you think that's actually true:
And that misapprehension is why you are 60 infractions deep.
Facebook will suit you better.
We're done here.
You are expected to exercise critical thinking skills. It's in the site rules. Please review them.
It's up to you to learn up if you missed it in...
OK, in crayons then:
Don't post on science forums until you have learned grade school critical thinking skills.
Well that's a telling admission... :eek:
Critical thinking is, notably, the one that's required by the forum rules. You have an obligation to know...
Most likely, by dying - went their component atoms went flying apart at the speed of light.
"...spam is defined as multiple unsolicited messages ... to large numbers of recipients ... for the purpose of non-commercial proselytizing... "...
You make no attempt to discuss - let alone analyze.
That's OK occasionally, but you have resorted to treating this as nothing but a repository of...
Again, quantity is not quality.
It would be informative to judge quality of contribution by number of warnings and bans:
Nope. Not even that.
Just crappy analysis and logic.
For my part, I am happy to engage with MR in other places where crappy analysis and logic do...
I still think you should do the experiment I proposed in post 6.
You're too close to the issue - you're drawing tentative conclusions about under...
OK well, I did the experiment myself and this is what I saw:
Sorry. Maybe it's just a brown-eye thing.
In the meantime, I offer the following experiment to determine if it is an objective phenom or a subjective phenom:
Cut a piece of flat black...
Indeed, but not much to be said until I replicate the experiment myself.
Well, I'll throw myself on this grenade and be the first to say it:
Why you not take your jewelry off in the shower? Also: are you single?
I agree. We can't assess probability. So let's don't.
Let's simply count minimum known conditionals.
i.e.: Occam's Razor.
'Time travel' only...
None of this is current day technology.
None of this is even science fiction.
For example. There's just a wee bit of magic between...
Frankly, even more plausible. The time travel hypothesis depends only on unknown physics. It does not depend on the existence of a whole...
I did you a favour. Here, it can be discussed properly.
Separate names with a comma.