not seeing this.
can you please provide the math?
what is it exactly you would like me to explain?
I will do that.
what math is wrong?
point it out specifically.
this is not a valid proof in current mathematics.
to prove an infinite set has a countable infinite subset you must employ the axiom of choice....
yes, OK, it is an abstract clock that conceptually function as time does.
theoretical clock that functions exactly as time does.
it's an abstraction.
anyway can you prove the sequence can be traversed?
does not work
Can anyone prove M&M findings are consistent with the sagnac effect that has been verified and proven by GPS?
Oh, can you prove any calculation i made that is not SR.
Write the proof out here step by step for everyone.
and write out any math calculation...
Say you have a countable infinite sequence A that is contained in some interval [a,b].
Prove a clock can tick through all elements of A when time...
prove all that.
prove your answer
you did not answer.
Given M and C' are co-located does LT give the correct position of light in the primed frame yes or no.
put the answer right...
I invite science.
prove any given mapping by LT is the same vector in the target frame using the light postulate.
let's have it....
this issue is can you prove any set that satisfies infinity contains all natural numbers.
in that you have failed.
how is that?
OK, i wrote my proof now write yours.
let's see how that all works out.
this is a simple issue.
Answer the question in the term of science.
Given M and C' are co-located does LT give the correct position of light in the...
Rpenner, you do not understand how to prove SR is consistent. LT claims when it maps a light position to the other frame that mapping produces what...
This peer reviewed article claims to force SR into a contradiction.
can anyone here stop that?...
Separate names with a comma.