This thread should be in either Pseudo or Conspiracies (or Trash).
Nexus magazine, the Collective Evolution and the CMSRI websites are nutcase...
Not going by the evidence. (E.g. French/ German/ English...)
Then why is so much time, effort and paper spent defining them?
Still making unsupported claims....
(One question: if there truly is an...
Or, perhaps, you should learn to how to be precise and write exactly what you mean.
And, at the same time, stop making sh*t up that you can't support.
Still sod all to do with "innate language".
Changing your story again?
Evidently you have problems with English (another argument against your "innate language" claim).
So STILL nothing to do with "innate language" (which has been your claim all along).
Would that be the third orange from the left on the top row at...
In other words: f*ck all to do with "innate language".
So still nothing but baseless claims...
The "common denominator" is observation: i.e. we agree on what "one" (or anything else) means.
You keep saying this, but you haven't provided any argument let alone evidence.
(And your contention is nonsense).
Bollocks - you just state your case very badly (or change your mind about what you do mean).
Now you're just making sh*t up.
WHY is it "natural"?
What makes it any more "natural" than any other word?
Er... photos from the early 1990s show...
Then you should learn to write more precisely: what you actually wrote was -
There's no such thing as a "natural word".
Except that you can't show that it's not true.
I.e. it's not right for you say this (and that's not a belief it's a fact).
Hence the phrase Traduttore traditore.
And Hofstadter's book Le Ton Beau de Marot (to give an accessible source).
So, what you're saying is:
A) you don't have any supporting data or argument,
B) you can't answer my questions, and
C) you're sticking with your...
I have no idea what you mean by "based on".
Language is, essentially, an arbitrary series of grunts etc that we have all decided to agree on.
Drivel. Translation to what?
Bad news for you: words are "meaningless" in and of themselves; they ONLY have "meaning"/ relevance because we...
Please provide evidence.
"Must"? What makes you think that?
Separate names with a comma.