the poll results show an even split between serious and non serious for our sciwki.
http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=64003

i propose the following solution, and that is the science articles are to remain serious.

the science articles are accessed from the "all pages" page at the top list box.
this part of the wiki currently has 2 entries.

what say you?

Or you could just create a category for serious science articles.

gee, i'm so impressed with all the valuable solutions you guys have come up with.

it seems to me all you mofos wanna do is bitch and scream.

another solution:
we could vote in a team to edit the wiki. this team will have to give a unanimous vote before any edit is accepted.

the science articles are accessed from the "all pages" page at the top list box.
this part of the wiki currently has 2 entries.

It's little wonder there are only 2 entries. Most here are more interested in writing jejune remarks on peoples bio pages so they can sit back, pat themselves on the back for a job well done and bask in the glow of their cunning linguistics.

It's little wonder there are only 2 entries. Most here are more interested in writing jejune remarks on peoples bio pages so they can sit back, pat themselves on the back for a job well done and bask in the glow of their cunning linguistics.

It could also be that all the science articles have not yet been categorised.

Nah. Surely not.
And it couldn't possibly be that more is going on there than Q believes is taking place even though he obviously hasn't actually looked for himself.
That would be... just plain ridiculous.
No. Q is right. The only activity on the wiki is people playing around with user pages.
Right?

Yeah.

Wait, was that sarcasm?
It was sarcasm wasn't it.
Damn, it was.
I stepped in your facetiousness, huh.

Nah. Surely not.
And it couldn't possibly be that more is going on there than Q believes is taking place even though he obviously hasn't actually looked for himself.
That would be... just plain ridiculous.
No. Q is right. The only activity on the wiki is people playing around with user pages.
Right?

Of course he failed to see the list I gave him in the secret forum.

Nor did he notice the category Biology.

http://www.sciforums.com/encyclopedia/Category:Biology

Nor am I planning to continue to expand this category if nazis are put in charge.

All things that have been said several times.

"Ich habe ess nicht gewusst", can only be used by proper German moderators from this time on.

I missed the memo, what was the point of a serious Swicki? Why not just write a science article for Wiki?

People do write serious articles.

I think he's asking why Q doesn't write a serious article. The answer to that is that is how can he be expected to write a serious article if he can't even be expected to actually even look at the wiki before making declarative statements about its contents and the goings on there?

It's a lot easier to be negative than positive.


As to the memo, I think that the wiki will be a combination of serious and not so serious articles.

Actually, I think it's shaping up just fine.

And, true to form, someday I'll find the time to contribute.



By the way, Spurious, I don't think the nazi's are moving in. Lixluke, in fact, is on the verge of being banned. There is no discussion (except for one lone voice, of course) that would indicate that the content provided by you and others is unacceptable.

Go ahead and get back to those serious articles.
Please?

Well, I broke my own embargo slightly already. It's just too tempting to write stuff. Added entries such as morphogenesis but kept them short.