i would like to propose that anyone using a racial epithet toward ANY group of people be banned, unless it can be proven that the slur wasnt serious, or some sort of unapplicable joke.

im sick of seeing the words "ragheads", "chinks", and so forth on this site.
it disgusts me.

I sort of agree but see big problems in proving that the slur 'wasn't serious', you brainless Jew clown.

I sort of agree but see big problems in proving that the slur 'wasn't serious', you brainless Jew clown.

heh....good example.
i dont see it as a hard problem to solve though....posting history, disposition of the post, etc.....these things can be used to help a moderator's discretion.

Fuck that. I want to see racial slurs on every post.

You're all just a bunch of northern hemisphere misfits.

i see several comments, and not enough votes to go with those comments.
choose a side, gentlemen.

So you're proposing that only The Brotherhood :cool: should get away with racial slurs? Hmmm.

So you're proposing that only The Brotherhood :cool: should get away with racial slurs? Hmmm.

nobody should get away with "slurs".
nothing is wrong with the words, its the way they are used.

GENIUS IDEA TDI!
UR CLOEVER!

You niggery wad of spic jizz

All slurs should be transformed into flowers by a program written into the forum.:thankyou:

Give them just 1 warning. The person may have been angry or drunk when writing it. However, mods should delete the offending sentence, paragraph or even the entire post, depending on its offensiveness level.

What I wrote above, refers to a complete ban. The devil doesn't specify the amount of ban, so I revise my vote and say yes, instant 7 day ban for racial and sexual-gender slurs, as the 1st and last warning.

so, i suppose that to those that voted "no", i should be allowed by forum rules to call someone a nigger and get away with it?

come on, now. this flies in the face of the last 60 years of western civilized discourse.

See what I wrote re deletions and 7 day ban as the last warning.

What I wrote above, refers to a complete ban. The devil doesn't specify the amount of ban, so I revise my vote and say yes, instant 7 day ban for racial and sexual-gender slurs, as the 1st and last warning.

i think ban length should be up to the moderator deciding such a thing, honestly.

some cases are worse than others, and sometimes its a joke shared by all...

common sense is key here.

It would be a shame to lose a key member for one lapse in judgment.

so, i suppose that to those that voted "no", i should be allowed by forum rules to call someone a nigger and get away with it?

come on, now. this flies in the face of the last 60 years of western civilized discourse.

Making allowances for some people based on private knowledge or history would be unfair to those people who followed their example and got banned.

i suggest we ban public polls.
it's nobodys business how i vote on anything.

Making allowances for some people based on private knowledge or history would be unfair to those people who followed their example and got banned.

how so?
i dont see it as unfair.
for example, ive called Nickelodeon a "limey" several times.
however, anyone that takes the time to even read the forum knows that i abhor bigotry.

in short: you have to look at the situation and implied intent before you make a judgement.

i reported several posts today because of the term "raghead" being used maliciously. you and i both are "raghead" people (after a sense), and this was a slur against both of us. however, if, for example, spuriousmonkey called me a raghead or whatever, i would know he wasnt intending to be offensive. if no offense is taken, why should absolute decisions be made that fly in the face of common sense?

again, common sense is key in deciding something like this.

someone who cant differentiate between malicious intent and friendly jibing in a statement shouldnt be reading such a highly charged forum in the first place.

i suggest we ban public polls.
it's nobodys business how i vote on anything.

i believe in accountability.

in short: you have to look at the situation and implied intent before you make a judgement.


do you realize how much work you are putting on moderators with this scenario?

if you are going to ban for something then it should apply evenly, across the board.

besides 'limey' is a valid term for british. they are the ones that discovered that limes cured/ prevented scurvey and started carrying them on sea voyages.

in short: you have to look at the situation and implied intent before you make a judgement.
You're asking an awful lot of the moderators. Perfect knowledge of the relationships of all the posters. They just aren't smart enough for this.

And limey? How about 'septic tank' for you yanks? Is that ok with you?

You're asking an awful lot of the moderators. Perfect knowledge of the relationships of all the posters. They just aren't smart enough for this.
you win the subtle humor award.

And limey? How about 'septic tank' for you yanks? Is that ok with you?
keep it up you hairbrained misfit.

how so?
i dont see it as unfair.
for example, ive called Nickelodeon a "limey" several times.
however, anyone that takes the time to even read the forum knows that i abhor bigotry.

in short: you have to look at the situation and implied intent before you make a judgement.

i reported several posts today because of the term "raghead" being used maliciously. you and i both are "raghead" people (after a sense), and this was a slur against both of us. however, if, for example, spuriousmonkey called me a raghead or whatever, i would know he wasnt intending to be offensive. if no offense is taken, why should absolute decisions be made that fly in the face of common sense?

again, common sense is key in deciding something like this.

someone who cant differentiate between malicious intent and friendly jibing in a statement shouldnt be reading such a highly charged forum in the first place.

I usually leave posts alone unless they are extreme or are reported.

From my own experience, I have seen people using slurs when they are frustrated with me; are they revealing their inner bigotry or venting their frustrations?

Others use slurs because I say things that make them mad and they feel a need to retaliate.

I consider these signs of temper rather than actual slurs.

Still others use slurs to appear worldly or drive home a point (like Roman), is that worth a ban?

Even racists protest they are not racists and anyone reading the forum casually is hard put to arrive at conclusions without interacting with many of the people.

In my opinion, if someone is offended, they should report the post and leave it up to moderation; if they feel moderation is inadequate, they are free to PM James R or Plazma.

I'm against randomly banning people or excluding people in a way not apparent to an infrequent visitor.

keep it up you hairbrained misfit.
Whoops. You find that offensive?

Maybe limey is more offensive than you assume then?

And limey? How about 'septic tank' for you yanks? Is that ok with you?

"yank" is the equivalent to limey. :)
we are already called "septic tanks" all over this forum, every day. *shrug*
i dont care, call us what you like, as long as you arent genuinely disparaging me as a person.

"yank" is the equivalent to limey. :)
we are already called "septic tanks" all over this forum, every day.
I know this. That's why I said it.

Leo doesn't think limey is offensive. It is.

I voted yes, but I think that warning should go first. Or one infraction.

tablariddim:
Give them just 1 warning. The person may have been angry or drunk when writing it. However, mods should delete the offending sentence, paragraph or even the entire post, depending on its offensiveness level.

We all have bad days, but I'm sure that no one, no matter how drunk or angry, will ever use a racial slur, except if he/she really means it.

If someone uses racial epithet in a negative context, he/she is a racist. There shouldn't be confusion about that.


It would be a shame to lose a key member for one lapse in judgment.
It wouldn't be a perma ban certainly. I'm sure there is a talk about instant temporary ban (3, 7, 10 days) instead of infraction.

I usually leave posts alone unless they are extreme or are reported.
and thats your decision alone to make :)

From my own experience, I have seen people using slurs when they are frustrated with me; are they revealing their inner bigotry or venting their frustrations?

Others use slurs because I say things that makes them mad and they feel a need to retaliate.

I consider these signs of temper rather than actual slurs.
just because it is said in the heat of the moment doesnt justify it's use.

Still others use slurs to appear worldly or drive home a point (like Roman), is that worth a ban?
yes.

Even racists protest they are not racists and anyone reading the forum casually is hard put to arrive at conclusions without interacting with many of the people.
you dont have to interact with somebody to know they are a racist, when only their words represent them here.
in fact, their words represent all of us here, to an extent, and represent www.sciforums.com even moreso. a forum is it's members.

In my opinion, if someone is offended, they should report the post and leave it up to moderation; if they feel moderation is inadequate, they are free to PM James R or Plazma.
and i have been personally insulted by moderators for reporting what i found to be offensive. i would rather certain moderators operate less by personal perogative, and more by a set of defined rules.

I'm against randomly banning people or excluding people in a way not apparent to an infrequent visitor.
banning someone for racist comments is not random, and if a visitor reads a racist post, and doesnt know why that person was banned, fuck em. (<---baron max moment, sorry :D)
next to names on the banlist are the reasons each person was banned. that should be sufficient for any "infrequent" guests that dont know the climate here. in fact, it would help them to understand what is acceptable and what isnt (in relation to our current topic).

I know this. That's why I said it.

Leo doesn't think limey is offensive. It is.

:D yes, but this is an example of one of my comments above.
you understand that when i call Nickelodeon this (now that im thinking about it, im not sure if i even said this to him publicly), it was a term used mostly to show a level of familiarity, not to reduce his self esteem in any way?

I don't disagree with the spirit of what you are saying, so I won't underline my position any more. :)

I don't disagree with the spirit of what you are saying, so I won't underline my position any more. :)

:D fair enough.
not often that we disagree.
its funny that this is the most meaningful thing ive posted on this forum in over a year (in my opinion), and it was arguing with you, of all people.

:D yes, but this is an example of one of my comments above.
you understand that when i call Nickelodeon this (now that im thinking about it, im not sure if i even said this to him publicly), it was a term used mostly to show a level of familiarity, not to reduce his self esteem in any way?
I know what you're saying too and am with you in spirit. I just think it's totally unworkable, that's all. :)

Maybe limey is more offensive than you assume then?
frankly i find the term limey to be a compliment.
a testament to the british ingenuity.

frankly i find the term limey to be a compliment.
a testament to the british ingenuity.

and british see the term "yank" (not "yankee") as a word implying our american-ness.

Most Brits realise yank is offensive. It generally has negative connotations. The original meaning of limey is lost in the mists of time. Now it just has a slightly offensive air about it.

The original meaning of limey is lost in the mists of time.
it came from the fact that british sailors ate limes on sea voyages to prevent scurvey.

true innovation and ingenuity.

I know that but most people don't. It doesn't matter though - the point is that no-one associates it with that any more. These days it's just sounds disrespectful.

These days it's just sounds disrespectful.
okay. i'll cede.

I know that but most people don't. It doesn't matter though - the point is that no-one associates it with that any more. These days it's just sounds disrespectful.

except when i say it to nickelodeon, of course.
because im cool like that.

It's fine for gentle foreplay between friends.

It's fine for gentle foreplay between friends.

dont worry, im a tender lover.
:p

I do eat limes. I have scurvy issues.

But: do you find the term limey offensive, as used derogatively by non-friends?

If we ban people who use racial slurs we might as well ban chinks and niggers.

Just because you have a new fangled more accepted form of intolerance doesn't make you any better. You're satisfying the exact same primal instinct to persecute another group of people for being different.

Anyway, as far as I'm concerned this rule is already in affect, I'm always getting banned for saying chink and nigger, and not in a personal "you're a nigger and therefore your opinions aren't valid" kind of way, I'm just interested in anthropology and I like to save time. For example I was just banned recently for explaining to roman how "chinks" have displaced "jungle bunnies" from most of the islands in indonesia, and where "jungle bunnies" remain they are treated like crap by the dominant "chinks".
And I was only using the terms "chinks" and "jungle bunnies" because roman used them and I was speaking to him in his language and I was banned for it.
JamesR is way ahead of you TDI.

You both have way too much time on your hands and far too few real problems in your lives as far as I'm concerned.

come on, now. this flies in the face of the last 60 years of western civilized discourse.
Bullshit.
It flies in the face of the gay political correctness which arose in the united states of america after white people took the whole racial intolerance thing a little too far and now they're embarrassed and ashamed of themselves and they try to make up for it by pretending to be offended by terms like "black guy".
I don't know why the rest of us have to suffer.

Nigger is a term which refers to negroes which is a word which traditionally refers to native africans. It's only a bad word because of a culture which arose in america which viewed negroes as lesser people, and they'd use it with a sneer like "nuthin but a damn nigger!".
So now it's a "cuss" word? I say fuck racist americans, they shouldn't have the power to make the word nigger seem negative just because they once saw niggers as lesser people.

I just feel bad for the little niggers out there who are fed this bullshit that "nigger" is a disgusting hate filled word, because they have to go look in a mirror and see a little nigger staring back, and what are they going to think?
They're going to think that what they are is disgusting, that describing someone as being the kind of person they are is a huge insult to the point of being damn near illegal. That's how insulting it is to call someone what they happen to be. What a confidence booster.

But: do you find the term limey offensive, as used derogatively by non-friends?
I see what you mean. Yes, I supose it would be offensive. But then again if a person wanted to be offensive they could say a lot of things, I dont think limey is the worst.

So now it's a "cuss" word? I say fuck racist americans, they shouldn't have the power to make the word nigger seem negative just because they once saw niggers as lesser people.
Whats the origin of the word nigger? Or chink? Were these "normal" words that were then hi-jacked by racists?

You both have way too much time on your hands and far too few real problems in your lives as far as I'm concerned.



dont speculate on things you have no idea about.
its obvious that you dont belong among anyone with an opinion that differs, and that you are incapable of reading the context of the thread.

malicious intent.
again, ill say it:
malicious intent.


ill now be reading every single post you make to report anything racist. thanks for putting yourself on my radar.

Erm... have you met Dr. Lou? :confused:

Hi Lou. Welcome back.

Erm... have you met Dr. Lou? :confused:

Hi Lou. Welcome back.

yep, sure have.
doesnt excuse the tirade he just went on. an excellent example of why this thread is necessary.

Most of you guys are very smart and very funny. I am not really offended by any of the language other than when someone personally attacks me and calls me a name that I KNOW is not true. :(

So far in my few days here I have been called dumb blonde, racist, bigot, and fat American. I'm not really offended by any of it because I know it's not true. And some people personally attack because they cannot discuss/ debate an issue. It's one thing to use an offensive term and another to personally attack with it.:(

I will honor whatever the mods say about language and don't plan to use any that would be personally offensive to anyone here. If (when) I accidentally insult someone, I would be the first to apologize.:)

I voted yes. I'm tired of seeing that sort of language myself

I'm confused...
I am not really offended by any of the language other than when someone personally attacks me and calls me a name that I KNOW is not true. :(
OK, so you only get offended when it's not true.
I understand.

But...
So far in my few days here I have been called dumb blonde, racist, bigot, and fat American. I'm not really offended by any of it because I know it's not true.
So you are not offended because it's not true?

I'm sorry, I don't get it.

ill now be reading every single post you make to report anything racist. thanks for putting yourself on my radar.
Well making this poll puts you on my gaydar. I'll be reading every post you make and calling you a faggot after each one, in rememberance of how gay you were for making this thread.

Gaydar, noun: The uncanny and seemingly innate ability lesbians and gay men tend to have to recognize and detect one another; from gay and radar.

You're so immature, gaydars can be used by anyone and have many applications.
Their primary function is for homos to find partners, sure, but obviously they can also be used to detect who should be called a fag.
Grow up.

Dr Lou Natic, you have options to choose:

Warning, infraction or ban for your posts.

one_raven: Confusion understood. I guess I get defensive when I know something big is not true--like the racist thing. But I just laugh at the dumb blonde thing because it's sort of a stupid, funny stereotype.

Nevermind. It's probably way too early to make sense...

You're so immature, gaydars can be used by anyone and have many applications.
Their primary function is for homos to find partners, sure, but obviously they can also be used to detect who should be called a fag.
Grow up.
It seems to me that the heterosexual version is of questionable accuracy. It's primarily gay equipment and dangerous in the wrong hands.

i would like to propose that anyone using a racial epithet toward ANY group of people be banned, unless it can be proven that the slur wasnt serious, or some sort of unapplicable joke.

im sick of seeing the words "ragheads", "chinks", and so forth on this site.
it disgusts me.
so, what does this mean for "nigger brown"?
http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=65673

i could have easily called the thread "spelling error upsets blacks".
or . . .
brown sofa maker is a racist.
or . . .
chinese software fails.
or . . .
i think you get the picture.

so, what does this mean for "nigger brown"?
http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=65673

i could have easily called the thread "spelling error upsets blacks".
or . . .
brown sofa maker is a racist.
or . . .
chinese software fails.
or . . .
i think you get the picture.

that thread was in-context to the problem, where the couch actually said "nigger" on it.

not applicable, really.

Sometimes I get so fucking tired of political correctness.

Have a nice day!:xctd:

Sometimes I get so fucking tired of political correctness.

Oooooo sam, you're a tiger!

Oooooo sam, you're a tiger!

Not really, but I am incredibly stubborn and impossible to budge from any stand I take.

It makes my life incredibly difficult (like right now, *sigh*), but its who I am.

It makes my life incredibly difficult (like right now, *sigh*), but its who I am.

Then perhaps instead of simply accepting it as "who you are" you might want to consider working on changing it.

Change into a Republican, you know you want to.

Then perhaps instead of simply accepting it as "who you are" you might want to consider working on changing it.

Good Idea Mr Raven

Sam to mr raven you must seek advice.

~~~~~~~~~~
Take it ez
zak

Then perhaps instead of simply accepting it as "who you are" you might want to consider working on changing it.

Well all the changes involve turning a blind eye to people's mistakes or kissing ass.

Humility has never been a strong point with me, especially false humility.:bawl:

All I'm saying is that there is something which you do not like about yourself, change it.
It's not really that difficult.

All I'm saying is that there is something which you do not like about yourself, change it.
It's not really that difficult.

I have no problem with it. :D

Humility has never been a strong point with me, especially false humility.:bawl:

All I'm saying is that there is something which you do not like about yourself, change it.
It's not really that difficult.
humility is something that must happen to you, like love.
it just happens, all the changing in the world does you no good.
and like love once you have it its always there, inside you.

humility is something that must happen to you, like love.
it just happens, all the changing in the world does you no good.
and like love once you have it its always there, inside you.
I couldn't disagree more on both humility and love.

humility is something that must happen to you, like love.
it just happens, all the changing in the world does you no good.
and like love once you have it its always there, inside you.

My problem is I have always been an independent thinker; its something that people don't take to easily and something I am not willing to give up about myself.

The humility part comes from my perceived invulnerability, most people want me to acknowledge a weakness I do not feel. I can't "work the system", I don't know how to.

I couldn't disagree more on both humility and love.
then you have neither.

My problem is I have always been an independent thinker; its something that people don't take to easily and something I am not willing to give up about myself.
has nothing to do with humility.

The humility part comes from my perceived invulnerability, most people want me to acknowledge a weakness I do not feel. I can't "work the system", I don't know how to.
there are people better than you sam in almost everything.
once that smacks you in the face then you'll know humility.

has nothing to do with humility.
You'd be surprised.


there are people better than you sam in almost everything.
once that smacks you in the face then you'll know humility.
See?:p

then you have neither.

That's an awfully arrogant assumption to make for someone who supposedly knows humility.

I disagree with you, that means I am wrong?
There is no chance you could be wrong?
There is no chance that we could simply be different, and both correct?

I have no need for advice about "humility" from you.
Nor love.
Thanks anyway.

See?:p
i feel sorry for you sam.

that's a typical mindset of a racist.
that isn't saying you are but it goes with the profile.

i feel sorry for you sam.

that's a typical mindset of a racist.
that isn't saying you are but it goes with the profile.

Yeah nothing gets people's backs up faster than someone who won't toe the line.

That's an awfully arrogant assumption to make for someone who supposedly knows humility.
i speak from personal experience.

I disagree with you, that means I am wrong?
if you actually meant what you said, yes.
There is no chance you could be wrong?
the lesson of humility is one i've never forgotten.
There is no chance that we could simply be different, and both correct?
the chances are astronomically slime.

I have no need for advice about "humility" from you.
Nor love.
Thanks anyway.
nobody can "teach" you humility or love.

Yeah nothing gets people's backs up faster than someone who won't toe the line.
interesting response sam.

interesting response sam.

Yeah, I recognise the signs easily now.:)

this thread is not on topic.

this thread is not on topic.

Try to read between the lines.;)

Its an interesting experiment.

this thread is not on topic.
party pooper.

probably not, although if it was enforced the impact would be as devestating as when Stalin got his hands on the Bolshevik party

i speak from personal experience.
As do I.

the lesson of humility is one i've never forgotten.
Just because you were arrogant and got slapped down, that doesn't mean that everyone else in the world must learn the same way.
It seems to me you need another lesson, because your arrogance shines through in this discourse.

the chances are astronomically slime.
Just because you were arrogant and got slapped down, that doesn't mean that everyone else in the world must learn the same way.
It seems to me you need another lesson, because your arrogance shines through in this discourse.

nobody can "teach" you humility or love.
I did not say that it can be taught.

please stop with this conversation, and discuss the topic.

thanks.

Narrator: In A.D. 2007, war was beginning.

~ Swoooshhh kabooom ~

James R: What happen?

Absane: Somebody set up us the bomb.

Plasma Inferno: We get signal.

James R: What !

Absane: Main screen turn on.

James R: It's you !!

darksidZz: How are you whities!!

darksidZz: All your base are belong to me.

darksidZz: You are on the way to destruction!

James R: What you say!!

darksidZz: You have no chance to survive whities prepare to die!

darksidZz: Ha Ha Ha Ha ....

Absane: Captain !!

James R: Launch off every Zig every freakin' one of them!!!!

James R: You know what you doing?

Absane: Moving the Zigs.

James R: For great justice!!!! ha ha ha ha! dieee niggie!

darksidZz: Arghhhh!!! OW Ow ow Me want female ow wo ow

LMAO dark... I actually laughed at that one.

i think ban length should be up to the moderator deciding such a thing, honestly.

some cases are worse than others, and sometimes its a joke shared by all...

common sense is key here.

exactly, common sense is the key, we need to take each offense case by case. we cant just go around banning good members just because they make a minor slur here and there.

i joke all of the time about tons of things, i dont think people should be banned for using a single word, thats not right, but for constant spamming of racial hate yes thats ok to ban them over,

in actual fact 80% of my posts are not to be taken seriously, i am a joke,

now shut up you nigger jew chink paki honk fucker,

peace.

i would like to propose that anyone using a racial epithet toward ANY group of people be banned, unless it can be proven that the slur wasnt serious, or some sort of unapplicable joke.

im sick of seeing the words "ragheads", "chinks", and so forth on this site.
it disgusts me.

I propose that all bans be banned.

I seem to remember it used to be an offense to ask for someone's banning.

Dr Lou Natic:

You have now be banned a couple of times for racist language, and yet, here you are again carrying on in the same vein. You just don't seem to get it, and you don't seem to have the capacity to learn from past mistakes.

Here's some learning for you:

Terms like "chink" and "nigger" are offensive for the same reason that terms such as "cunt" and "fuck" are offensive. All these words have developed historical connotations, not because they have any innate feature of being offensive groupings of sounds or speech-tones, but because of how they have been used and applied in society.

The term "nigger" is offensive to many black people not because they don't like the "nig" sound or something. It is because the term has a long history of being used and applied in a disparaging way to label them.

Anyway, as far as I'm concerned this rule is already in affect, I'm always getting banned for saying chink and nigger, and not in a personal "you're a nigger and therefore your opinions aren't valid" kind of way, I'm just interested in anthropology and I like to save time.

Bullshit. I don't believe you're actually that stupid as not to be aware of the effect that your choice of language has on the people who hear it or read it.

Your attitude has nothing to do with an "interest in anthropology". It has everything to do with your bigotry.

Nigger is a term which refers to negroes which is a word which traditionally refers to native africans.

Consider that "tradition". Is it a proud tradition? Is it a "tradition" that was introduced by the targeted people themselves, or by their oppressors?

And what does it say about you that you want to continue this "tradition"? I'll tell you: it says you're a dinosaur who is longing to resurrect past hatreds and build a new society based around past hatreds.

It's only a bad word because of a culture which arose in america which viewed negroes as lesser people, and they'd use it with a sneer like "nuthin but a damn nigger!".

See? You're not really stupid after all. Now, try to engage you brain ALL the time, instead of just some of the time.

So now it's a "cuss" word? I say fuck racist americans, they shouldn't have the power to make the word nigger seem negative just because they once saw niggers as lesser people.

The word "nigger" IS negative. It has never been anything else BUT negative. And you know it. And you want it that way.

I just feel bad for the little niggers out there who are fed this bullshit that "nigger" is a disgusting hate filled word, because they have to go look in a mirror and see a little nigger staring back, and what are they going to think?

You are a racist bigot.

The whole issue of offense, lies in the context and the sentiment behind the words used. Dr. Lou's last quoted statement uses just such a context, even though it's pretending to merely explain a point, the sentiment behind it is offensive.

"chink" and "nigger" "cunt" and "fuck" "nigger" bullshit. "nigger"
good god james, have you been drinking? :)

exactly, common sense is the key, we need to take each offense case by case. we cant just go around banning good members just because they make a minor slur here and there.

the context of the situation has to be taken into consideration, but if there is even a slight deviation from "common sense", i believe the offense is banworthy.

i would like to propose that anyone using a racial epithet toward ANY group of people be banned, unless it can be proven that the slur wasnt serious, or some sort of unapplicable joke.

im sick of seeing the words "ragheads", "chinks", and so forth on this site.
it disgusts me.

Typical kike :rolleyes:

Typical kike :rolleyes:

:p

homo.

i call my wife a nigga all the time,

peace.

Typical kike :rolleyes:

also, what cracks me up is that im not descended from jews.
im a convert. :p

you converted to judaism?

peace.

you converted to judaism?

peace.

yeah.

That's like converting to leprousy.

Peace.

yeah.

whats the deal with the male headwear? is it like the bigger the hat the more important? skull caps mean you are a noob?.



noobs/rookies
http://arizona.indymedia.org/uploads/bushatwailingwall.jpg


inters/experts
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/01/06/nyregion/06rite650.jpg


super expert
http://www.nytheatre-wire.com/lt00081d.jpg




peace.

That's like converting to leprousy.

Peace.


i wouldent go that far,

peace.

That's like converting to leprousy.

Peace.

reported.

whats the deal with the male headwear? is it like the bigger the hat the more important? skull caps mean you are a noob?.



noobs/rookies
http://arizona.indymedia.org/uploads/bushatwailingwall.jpg


inters/experts
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/01/06/nyregion/06rite650.jpg


super expert
http://www.nytheatre-wire.com/lt00081d.jpg




peace.

:) just like other religions, there are several types of judaism.
im not a hasid.

:) just like other religions, there are several types of judaism.
im not a hasid.

i dont know what a hasid is but i can find out with my friend google.

peace.

See? Double standards, roman calls him a kike, unambiguously to his kikey face, and this causes TDI to unleash the cute tongue out emoticon.
I suggest it is unusual for someone to purposefully convert to judaism, and I'm swiftly reported and then given an infraction.

Even though the first post in the thread said "I'm so sick of seeing racial slurs like chink and raghead", not "I'm so sick of religions being compared to diseases".

You guys are too stupid to even be wusses.

" The Devil Inside
KNEEL BEFORE ZOD!!! (7,399 posts)

Today, 08:15 AM
#111

“
Originally Posted by Dr Lou Natic
That's like converting to leprousy.

Peace.
”
reported. "



Reported for reporting.

See? Double standards, roman calls him a kike, unambiguously to his kikey face, and this causes TDI to unleash the cute tongue out emoticon.
I suggest it is unusual for someone to purposefully convert to judaism, and I'm swiftly reported and then given an infraction.

Even though the first post in the thread said "I'm so sick of seeing racial slurs like chink and raghead", not "I'm so sick of religions being compared to diseases".

You guys are too stupid to even be wusses.
Poor racist trolls are soooo oppressed and unfairly marginalized.:( There are neo Nazi forums out there that are a much better fit for a minority such as yourself. Branch Out dude.:rolleyes:

I am drunk and do not seriously want all the muslims, jews, catholics, budists, etc, etc out of my country, i only want harmony in the community,
if it takes ridding the commuinty of these people fair enough, after all it is them that are pushing thier values on us, not the other way round, accept our hospitality or sod off, the words of a drunk.

i dont know what a hasid is but i can find out with my friend google.

peace.

krusty the clown's dad is a hasid.

hasidism has become the stereotype face of judaism (in europe at least).

The only true jew was jesus.

Did I just see Genji defending a Jew?

<Rubs eyes.>

Did I just see Genji defending a Jew?

<Rubs eyes.>

im cool like that.

http://sciforums.*******************/permanent/baronmax2.GIF

im cool like that.
For a Jew, maybe. Only kidding... or am I? And besides, what's Da Baron got to do with it!??? :confused:

he be sexaaaaay.

lol instant ban, almost made me think, i write a racial slur and post reply i get an IM, you are banned :D

that'd be neat :)


Rick

"Dear ex-Sciforums member,

Good luck at your next forum.

Plazma Inferno."

lol

"So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish!"

Yours truly,

Plazma Inferno!