Why do SOME men feel so threatened by women?

Your interpretation my response as 'irrational' says nothing about why I chose to criticise. Is there something abnormal about disliking unfounded arrogance? I don't think so. Your analogy is also invalid. What you claim a frightened animal does cannot explain the behavioural patterns of an internet board user, and it's conceited of you to think that it can.

You are assuming that I do not take these "pot-shots" and get away with them in face-to-face confrontations. You assume way too much.

Even in psychology, the idea that someone must accept the label of 'mental illness' is totally fallacious. Many people, myself included believe that the concept of mental illness is arbitrary at best.
You continue to demonstrate a lack of knowledge and an inability to reason. You are ascribing faults to me which you've fabricated, possibly because it makes you feel better about why anyone wouldn't share your views.
Keep talking. You haven't rationalised anything you've said even after I've underlined it. You are unable to rationalise, therefore you are clearly mentally ill.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

So now I'm a fool...?

Well, if I was to say that every time I've read a post like yours it's been written by an idiot or retard, then that would be ok right? Because I'm not actually calling you an idiot or retard!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I don't need to rationalise? There is nothing rational about you calling a poster who has made no reference to you an 'overbloated bitch' such nonesense doesn't derserve anything more than you have rec'd. You don't like it tough.

If my analysis of your irrational emotional insults is incorrect, then explain what was driving you, why did you feel the need to personally attack the poster rather than merely reply to the post? What is your motivation...if not fear?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I didn't call you an idiot or retard either, so again more nonsense.

Do you have a reason for why SOME men fear women or not?

 

No matter how I answer you are going to twist it to "see you're threatened!" so I'm not going to bother. And while you might deny it, the other forum-users will notice well enough by themselves.

What I'm saying now is what I've said in my first post. Women who obsess over some sort of 'vaginal birth power' they believe they have over men need to come down from their high-horses. Perhaps the fact that this subject arose is a testimony to women feeling threatened by men. If this was not the case, why should a woman choose assume that men are threatened by women. To me it seems like this idea in itself is a method to gain some sort of self-satisfactory leverage over men, caused by fear perhaps?

As for the severity of my post, it annoys me to no end when people make wild claims. The idea that women have "the ultimate power of birth..." does more harm than good, because it only draws attention to the fact that men and women are different. If anything this is only going to perpetuate a cycle in which certain men and women choose to bicker about these inconsequential issues. The sooner female-superioritists get over themselves, the sooner males are going to stop feeling offended by women who try to claim some sort of superiority over men.

 

ahhhhh, so yer saying men and women are equal?

 

In a way, but I'm also attacking the idea that men and women are equal, because raising this issue only draws attention to the fact that we are different.
People belonging to both genders whether arguing for equality or superiority need to get over themselves.

The reasons why a female would create a "why do some males feel threatened by women" are obvious. It is totally contradictory to take such a specific stance and claim that it is there to 'balance' an issue for the sake of equality

 

Now then Azael

Re your comment "Perhaps the fact that this subject arose is a testimony to women feeling threatened by men" does this also explain the 'why are women inferior thread'? in that the male posting it feels threatened by women? Your logic not mine.

re your comment: "If anything this is only going to perpetuate a cycle in which certain men and women choose to bicker about these inconsequential issues. The sooner female-superioritists get over themselves, the sooner males are going to feel offended by their fascist behaviour. " so you can also apply this to the 'why a e women inferior' thread? good then we are in agreement.

If you read my posts here you will see that I do not make any sexist comments about men, rather the opposite. You want to disagree with the post about the birth thing, thats fine, its her opinion and you are expressing yours, hence the forums, name calling though invalidates everything you say as people stop listening or in this case reading.

Have you never noticed how when in public two people argue, the one who gets all the sympathy is the one who remains the quietest and shouts the least..regardless of who is right or wrong.

Re your reply to Duendy, I believe and have posted here already that we equally contribute and our differences are imperative for the continuation of species.

Why did I start this thread? To reveal the women hating sexists from the other thread (not all of them, some had good arguments as to why they believe we are inferior, not based on 'hate') but guess what? None of them have made an appearance.

Just a tip is all, I was reading your reply to that birth post with interest until the very last line, that after seeing rationale in your point, it was all lost in the insults.

 

Perhaps it does, but my comment was only posted to illustrate the futility in labelling a behaviour as a response to 'feeling threatened'.

This bothers me again. The fact that you keep reversing this to the "why are women inferior" thread communicates that you are taking a stance to 'even the scales'. You can't wage nuclear war to achieve peace, even if your 'opposition' is doing it. This is why I think you are on par with the people who started the "why are women inferior" thread. The way I see it, you are part of the problem.

Call me an idealist, but I'd rather express myself in relation to what I believe is right, rather than employ tactics to gain the favour of an audience.

'bloated' and 'egotistical' both imply self-importance, while 'bitch' implies someone who makes offensive remarks. This was not entirely a slur, but for every 20 serious and uptight boardreaders who were offended, there was probably one who laughed to him/herself. This one reader would have been the only forum-user I care about.

 

Well Azael, so you seek favour from forum readers? Interesting especially as you just insinuated thats what I was doing? "employing tactics blah blah blah' I seek no popularity, I have friends in real life, this forum for me at the moment is stress relief. When things get hectic i check out this site, its a good distraction. Some people here demonstrate excellent humour!

Me evening the scales - yes I may be guilty of trying that, this though isn't nuclear war as not one woman here has posted anything like as offensive re men as has been posted on that thread so you cannot compare the two. If it was a war we'd have lost as we are being nice!

They are now talking about rape in that thread, do you have ANY clue how this kind of talk makes women feel? Have you ever been on the receiving end of a violence ? This is the worst kind of violence and as we are amongst men every day we do not want to know that they hate us and fear us so much they want to rape us, to dominate us and keep us in our place. Rape is not a sexual act.

Me being part of the problem? Your opinion, you are entitled to it.

 

ps Azael

if you are all for equality, have you made any posts relating to this stance in that thread? if not then you are part of the problem.

 

I didn't insinuate a thing and I never made reference to you.

Wow, this is quite the bombshell. That's a very long non-sequitur. Almost too long for a well-adjusted individual I would have thought. You know, if you chant that over and over again like a mantra, you might actually end up believing it.

What are little boys made of? Snips and snails, and puppy dogs' tails; That's what little boys are made of."
"What are little girls made of? Sugar and spice, and everything nice; That's what little girls are made of."

I've been on the receiving end of violence, but no rape. I do accept that it must feel terrible to be the victim of rape, and if I was a woman I would definately carry a weapon to avoid this scenario.

I don't understand why you are convinced that "rape is not a sexual act". Sex drives differ in the genders, and to me often enough sex is sex. So why is it so farfetched to believe that a particularly sadistic man might rape a woman for sexual gratification?

 

Cor Azael, so much nonesense here I don't know where to begin? So I won't. re the reason I visit this site, it is as I have said, why do you have trouble believing that? Why are you here if not for amusement?

I have started a thread based on the enjoyment I get from the intelligent humour I see in some of the postings, you aren't enjoying it why are you here? When it stops being fun I won't be?

 

is rape sex? no. its power over. men rape men in prisons, etc. is it sex? no its power-over. temale asserting his autority. does he get off having cum up a bloody cunt or arse. probably so. but is it sex. no. it is power over.
so how do you rate 'sex' then is rthe question? how do you see your woman who you hve sex with. as a kind of blow up doll, orrrr?

 

We're all mentally ill to some degree... everyone has a "mask". Everyone conforms to a manner that is believed "normal", but none of us are this "normal" - there's no normal... Walk down a busy street and you'll see everyone's in their own little world - We're all f*cked up... just enjoy it, and as long as you're not killing or hurting anyone, be whatever you want to be.

 

hehe, cool

 

Yes. Sometimes.
Why do you think people masturbate? It has nothing to do with power. Sometimes getting off is all that really matters.

In the rare instance that a woman commands my respect and interest, then sex might just be something other than detached gratification.
I don't believe that women are any less worthy of respect than men, but that's irrelevent, given that I'm not fucking men.

 

i dont think i remember any case of a man feeling threatened by a woman... intimidated, yes, but not threatened

 

Neither can I. the only situations I can recall are when men are intimidated by female beauty and are too self-absorbed and scared to make a move.

Guys are much more likely to submit to women rather than challenge them, because every woman is instinctually evaluated as a possible mate.

 

`
I'm threatened as all get out by womens' enigmatic and mysterious digestive tracts...

Hadda hell do youse broads seem to go for days without crapping ???!!!

It ain't natural, I tell ya !

There.

I said it.

I feel strangely free from the coiled fetters which have held me bound up for lo, these many years.

.