Now, the Bush Junta and its lap dogs plan to bomb them. More young Americans to get killed seraching for more elusive nuclear bombs . George Bush please write on the blackboard 1000 times, "Iran is building a power station, and has no more nuclear weapons than Iraq did."
Brian: Swear that to me with absolute certainty on the lives and souls of yourself and everyone you care about on the whole of the earth.
Do their leaders want to and are just still looking for a way. Do they have an alternative means to threaten us? Are they just taking the low tech road and funding or convincing goons to go across the border into Iraq to blow up our troops and incite violence? Are they funding any foreign organizations of goons to do the same? And I still want that oath. The UN is basically a giant book club with little ability to see and even less to act.
Anyone outside the U.S. with some spare room and board? No way in hell am I gonna get drafted to Iran for this peckerhead. I'll gladly defend my town in a heartbeat, but all this pre-emptive use of force is pure bullshit. Trying to bring us into WWIII. I can't wait till Pakistan, the rest of the Middle East, China, and hell, maybe even the EU joins in to protect Iran from us. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! - N
Gee whiz, Foley! You are some poor piece of work. After your silly post about Russia and now this, I'm convinced you know absolutely *nothing* about the realities of the world and politics. Bush is NOT - repeat - NOT planning on bombing Iran. There are NO current plans of action. What he's doing is known as 'sabre rattling' - giving a warning, in case you can't comprehend that phrase either. Have you missed a few doses of your medication? Better get them refilled - quickly!!
Why does the USA think it has the right to say which country can have nuclear weapons or technology and which one does not? If possesion of nuclear arms was such a crime then the US would be the first country to be attacked.
And tanks, aircraft carriers, planes, helicopters, missiles, unmanned planes with weapoons, bombs, bigger bombs, much bigger bombs, better rifles, better bullets, better soldiers, better leaders, better training, .........Get the picture? The biggest obstacle that we face is that we let the mamby-pamby, doo-gooder liberals influence our use of those weapons and technologies. Iraq would be gone if we actually fought it as a war. As it is, we're just playing around to try to satisfy all the whining cry-babies of the world. Baron Max
I'd question your "better leaders". Having a dumb redneck as your president is nothing to be proud of, if you aren't such a redneck yourself of course (which seems to be true).
Well, Avatar, here in America, you have the right to your opinion. But, you know, you DON'T have that right in the great majority of nations that you seem to be defending .......using that right same of "free speech"!?! Kinda' curious, ain't it? Baron Max
And tanks, aircraft carriers, planes, helicopters, missiles, unmanned planes with weapoons, bombs, bigger bombs, much bigger bombs, better rifles, better bullets, better soldiers, better leaders, better training, .........Get the picture? You left out the biggest debt in the world. You left out the stupidest leader in the world. And especially you left out, some of the most psychopathic losers in the world. And at one time, I think Hitler had the biggest and best army. Live by the sword, die by the sword. I wonder when the day will come when most civilized people respond with the same sense of revulsion to the word neocon that they feel when hearing the word nazi. I think many have already reached that point.
I always had my dislikes about the US. Or is it Bush. I'm not quit sure. During Clinton the US was doing pretty well yes it had the world greatest military force, but the world didn't much care about that, because the knew. Clinton would never use them. Then the people pretty much dumped him, yust because he had a mistriss. I agree that this is a bad career move, but like the France president said et alors. But Bush is a other story. He wasn't even ellected as a president. He got the winning vote yust because his little brother forget to count halve the votes. Some facts: you can argue them if you like Afther Bush was elected Floridas votes where recount Gore won the election Bush is a below averague student, a pot heat and not to forget a yeehaa cowboy It's pretty cruel stating it like this, but this is the President of the United States. I agree this post was rued toward the american president, And I agree that most americans wans they have picked a president, they stick with it. (American Patrionism I gues). But Afther prereading this I can't find anything that is incorrect or out of proportion. So if some of the patriotic (that don't care for the 22 200 civilians deaths but do care the 1175 yong americans deaths) have anything to say. Please be my gues. I'm a bit bored actuelly. Hell not to break the threath entirly, I do believe Iran has the right to mine, produce and use uranium for civil and scientific reasons as long that there watch dogs over the entire proces. If they can have that then perhaps there will be some tension relief in Iran besides the alternative of bombing a Moslim nuclear instaltion at this time would not be a good ID. And we now were those instalations are. If we would bome them they could rebuild them in secret and do it behind or backs. If there allowd to do it legally their can be control. And aftherwarts the spend rods could be shipped toward India for storage they can see it as a extra. And it leaves the EU free to have a small war fleet in Iranian waters. To protect the cargo ship. What do you think
Ahh, more bullshit about the election, huh? ...LOL! If it was such a proven consipracy, then why hasn't it been brought to trial? Ahhh, it's just bullshit, huh? And you can't have a trial with just bullshit as evidence? Oh, okay, I get it now. Baron Max
Ahh..so it's bullshit too you. If it's a proven fact that Bush did not steal the election than why don't you prove it. Why don't you prove that what everyone else is saying is bullshit.
keep in mind I wrote the article yust to get a fast response. I don't have any problem with Bush (partially because I don't have a car and therefore don't have to pay fuel). Okay the election conspiracy explained in simple facts first time voting: This voting dismissed. Because it was to close. Anyway this voting officialy didn't count. It's a legal thing. Declared by the Supreme Court (they can do that). Then the votes were recounted or something like you guy's proberly now better anyway. But varius investigations showed irregularities that were in favor of Bush. For more info on this you can check out Palm beach butterfly ballot In short Al Gore would have won with a 10 times bigger margine. Offcourse this all took some time. And if the people then knew then what they would now Al Gore would have been the winner. But then Bush was already president. And you can't yust dismiss a president and replace him with a other one, certainly not afther his vow thingy so they left it like it was. So Busch became president afther losing the nationwid popularity vote (first time sins 1888 4th time ever). And afther losing the valid election (first time ever, offcourse this is negotionable). Anyway yes their was fraud during the election. And it would take a foreigner that could count in numbers in stead of in kilotons to bring any clarity in the cases witch offcourse will never happen. (The thing about the numbers and kilotons is offcourse a joke) What I'm getting at is that ending the conflict with Iran with guns would be a verry bad ID. That Iranian prime minister said he had air defenses around his nuclair instalations. So far terrorists haven't been crazy enof to try something with our nuclair power plants, but who knows afther we would bomb one of them. Anyway a other fact afther the Watergate scandal about Vietnam, then the current president had to resign. I don't know what you think but Iraq is starting to smell yust like that. Bush even now says that Iraq is a strategic battle in the war against terror. I wonder witch terror he means, the one he's causing or the one there causing. During WWII afther Hitlers defeat the americans still had to fight the Japs. And sorry to say but they were pretty fanatic at the moment to. But in the end they surrenderd and they even could keep their emperer wich was responsible for millions of death,rapes, mutulation and theft. They let him go because they could still use them to hold the country together. Anyway my point is that Sadam tried to negotiad at the end. He let the inspectors do their job, and they only left because america would bomb the facilities shortly afther. And now that Sadam is out of the picture it's like playing chess when the oponent doesn't have it's king anymore. Now the only way of winning is by eliminating all the enemy's pawns. Witch basicly means afther commiting a masacre. Was Sadam a monster that terroristed his own poppulation? Sure he killed a great deal of them with his gas attacks but not anything recent. There certainly wouldn't have been 20 000 casulties now if America never went to war. Their also wouldn't be that many suicide attacks. The middle east would have been more stable and oil would have been cheaper. A simple deduction Sadam had allready cracked under the presure and would have allowed inspections. And with the exception of the death from the palestian and Saudi Arabieen leader. All the trouble in the middle east is all Bush his fault.
i'm sorry, did someone use the phrase "doo-gooder" liberals? as opposed to the "do only evil things that bennefit other rich men", republicans? argh... it pisses me off that this is the country i have to live in right now... and i'm sick of being told that if i dont like it i can leave. because plenty of people dont like it, and the idea of democracy, is that if the people dont like it, than they have the power change it themselves. this is fine and all, but i'm sick of the only place i'm able to vent at, being online forums... likewise, the only other people i find who are just as passionate, seem only to exist within the confines of my monitor... if so many people are against bush (or atleast whats going on), why the hell havent we done anything yet? whats it going to come to? civil war, is an option... whats going to happen when the public witnesses the government attacking it's own people? what will the world do, but marvel, as they watch the only real super power crumble from within itself?
Yeah, sabre rattling, just as was done in Iraq after Iraq dismantled all their illegal missles yet we still went after them. What if for some crazy reason, Iran gives up it's nuclear research, we'll say that's not good enough and we'll still invade them. And no plans on bombing Iran? That's not gonna convince anyone when the Iraq plans were already written up way ahead of time. Heck, I wretch at hearing both neocons and democrats. Damned fanatics on each side of the spectrum. Where's all the independents? - N
