ok guys i have a problem, my gramam got married ( thtas not the problem i like her new husband)but, i liked his daughters, kids ( his grand kids) so there not my cusin-in-laws by marrige... would it be wrong . froned apon to ask them out or soemthing?
They're not related to you by blood, so there's no risk of problems stemming from inbreeding. It's fine.
There's no genetic penalty, and it's not like they're your sisters-in-law (even then I can't really justify why it would be a problem except for the social stigma). Go for it!
I think its only weird at the first moment of hearing it. But after looking at it for more than a second.....nothing wrong with it at all. Espeacially if you liked them "before". I think people will only get wierded out by it if you are.
Stupid, Stupid, Stupid.......all needed to be said! To even ask such a question is well......look above this line. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
regnstorm: Its a guaranteed anyone of us would sleep with parents, brothers, cousins until the day we found out they were our parents, brothers, cousins. My father would be fucking hot, had I not known he was my daddy. Incest is social stigma. Homosexuality, “pedophlia” which once was pederasty and so and so on..same thing. Aside: Aren’t your grandmother’s children’s children also your parents, technically? Cousins are your biological or adoptive parent’s sibling’s children. How are these girls riku’s cousins?
I was about to say something else entirely here, but I just realized you didn't say what I thought you did... So. I think that they would something like second cousin-in-laws. Or step second cousins. That's probably better. Here. From Wikipedia: "Two persons of the same generation who share a grandparent are "first cousins" (one degree of collaterality); if they share a great-grandparent they are "second cousins" (two degrees of collaterality) and so on. If the shared ancestor is the grandparent of one individual and the great-grandparent of the other, the individuals are said to be "first cousins once removed" (removed by one generation); if the shared ancestor is the grandparent of one individual and the great-great-grandparent of the other, the individuals are said to be "first cousins twice removed" (removed by two generations), and so on. Similarly, if the shared ancestor is the great-grandparent of one person and the great-great-grandparent of the other, the individuals are said to be "second cousins once removed."
It's strange and you will have to do a lot of explaining to people to pursue it. Inbreeding may be acceptable where you live (where you grandma can get married, and then you have to figure out how the relationships work in your family).
Zion: No, think about it. If the reasons for the incest taboo were blood or genetic, then why in our culture are relations between step family members or adopted sibliings frowned upon? Neither share blood. If my fahter had his tounge in my mouth, I'd be licking him back...until I found out he was my father. At which point I'd wretch. Same with you and your mother....unless she's repulsive one way or the other. This tells me the deterrent is psychological, not biological. Nexus: Way too complicated. But thanks.
Is it any wonder so much cousin fuckin' goes on? I was thinking the same thing about it being complicated. In fact, I fucked up. They'd be step-first cousins. Not second. If you share grandparents, you're first cousins.
I don't remember last time I f***** my cousin. It was way too many years ago.... Ooooops... did I say that aloud...? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
That's the spirit Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! LOL! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
I would assume by the general public it's frowned upon but I see no problem cause your not related by blood..
