It doesn't but I think her point was that she sees the Bush agenda as being blatantly anti-Islam. You know, the whole zionist conspiracy claptrap.
Although I don’t believe in a Zionist conspiracy it’s a special interest group as well, and it would rather foolish to ignore their demands on the US gov’t. They provide millions in campaigning funds and they are a very powerful lobbying group, although I don’t believe there is a Zionist conspiracy, there is a Zionist power bloc that resembles that of the oil companies and even the balloon lobbying group…and one of the Zionist lobby’s interests of course is the neutralization of Islamic threats to Israel, real or imagined. I mean honestly why is the US putting sanctions on Syria when Syria doesn’t present a threat to anyone in this world apart from Israel?
"Zionist bloc"? we dont have a jewish super power determind to convert the rest of the world to Judiasm by force! >> Stokes - thats not quite what I meant, its just the president realy doesnt trust Islamic fundamentlists (not many Americans do)
Zionists by definition aren't Jewish, so there's no fear from that. Secondly they aren't doing anything different then oil interests in the US, or drug companies, but instead of profits its aid, and support for Israel.
what are Zionists then? People hooked on the Matrix movies..? I dont see the problm with wanting non profit aid, or support for Israel.
Zionists are Zionists, nationalists who believe pseudo-science of a jewish race to justify their breaking of a promise to god never to go back, and as a result is a atheist ideology to brink "racial Jews" back to their "homeland".
so in a way, theyre like the Germans who also believed in a Jewish race - except theyre proud to be that race, not hating it thinking its inferior + needing to be wiped out. The original Zion - was that supposd to be a real place at one time, or a spiritual city in the next worl for jews?
so in a way, theyre like the Germans who also believed in a Jewish race - except theyre proud to be that race, not hating it thinking its inferior + needing to be wiped out. Ur right their like the Germans but in a different sense,the Germans believed that they descinded from the Aryan race, like the Jews believe they descended from the Hebrew, when neither have enough to justify that if any. So like the Germans Zionists claim the land theirs because of their pseudo-racial connection. Nazi's supported Zionism by making ppl think Jews are racial, when they are not.
"That was the American mentalities prior to 9.11 don’t be sure about American superiority because it doesn’t exist in a globalized world. North Korea doesn’t have anything to lose once the war starts, I don’t think u get it, like a suicide bomber it has only one goal left in its life so it could give less of a shit about whether or not you “believe” the US will never be attacked, chances are it will eventually." Come now unde. You dont honestly believe that NK would attack the U.S. Lets get real here. An ICBM attack on the U.S. would justify a full launch in reprisal. There would be no North Korea or for that matter much of Asia left. If Kim Suck Dong II was getting that trigger happy, I have a funny feeling the Chinese would take care of him.
Not if the enemy was a little place like NK and only had a few bombs - the US or China could take them out wit out it being a world wide diaster.
um ye... a nuclear explosion spreads in a circular fashion... it dosnt stop at borders, you expect china to nuke somthing so close to its own border? If the US Even launched a nuke the world would flip and point fingers. and I have said this more than once , that radiation spreads through the atmosphere.. all the fallout would spread to alot of countries and cause alot of problems.
If a blast hit NK the south would be unlivable and depending on how big and the wind pattens it could spread as far as Darwin, Australia. Yes the world would point fingers, the question is with the various gov's we have at the moment and the probability that the US would try to cover it up as an acident in NK what would the world DO?
Australia? Prevailing winds across the peninsula originate from the Gobi desert in the west, which would send this alleged fallout plume towards Japan. Anyway, it would take a huge ass weapon exploded on purpose in a specific way to create that level of contamination. Not likely.
Winds come from anywhere in different seasons, and even a small weapon could easily contaminate the area.
I gues the spread of damage + fallout depens on how BIG the nukes you use are.. about 50 kilo tonns could flaten Pyongyang without much blast reaching into SK, surely. I know realy powerful bombs exist but we dont have to use them when smallr ones will do - and no one would use nukes AT ALL unless there was realy no choice, esp. not China as Odin rightly said.
How do you feel about the fact that the US has nukes and are willing to use them 'if threatened'?, do you feel that its reasonable to threaten iran with the use of nuclear weaponary, when that is precisely what bush's 'excuse' is? :bugeye:
Jenny there is no nuke that is so small that the fallout wont spread such a tiny distance. here are contamination levels of the states from nuke testing in them ilitary facilities in nevada and new mexico. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Chernobyl radioactive material spread across the northern hemosphere: Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
