Rock/Structure Redux.

Thanks. I hope so too, although it's one of the less foolish causes for martyrdom.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I don't know. Maybe NASA should have examined it to find out?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Would you have NASA stop to examine every rock they encountered that had a flat surface?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

No, they should examine every rock that looks interesting. That's what their up there doing isnt it?

 

Who gets to define "interesting?" To the uneducated eye, the forms you see might be "interesting," to the experienced and educated eye, they're simply rocks. Perhaps the people at NASA, JPL, and others know what they're doing.

Then again, you could always: 1) get a job there and show them where they're wrong; 2) write a paper and submit it to a peer-reviewed journal and show them where they're wrong.

 

A flat rock, that could be the greatest discovery SHOULD be interesting to everyone. However, due to the argumentative war between those interested in finding the truth about ETI from such an image and those who don't - we don't get anywhere.

I've figured out that some simply do not believe in using "structures" to verify that alien intelligence exists or existed.

 

Because rocks can not be naturally flat.
?

 

btimsah, for the umpteenth time, when the 'structures' you see are perfectly natural structures, what else are we meant to think. Where and when did you derive the notion that you can't have flat rocks. If you really believe this then you are displaying your ignorance to the world.

 

This is a nice try, but when NASA see's a rock that LOOKS LIKE A METORITE they investigate it and believe that it is.

So, if they see an object that LOOKS LIKE A STRUCTURE they SHOULD investigate it. However, they won't.

I don't care what rationale you b.s. yourself into believing, they should investigate potential structures on planets. The mere fact that they don't is fraud.

 

Face it, btimsah. You see structures that others don't. Perhaps you're just more observant. Or perhaps you're simply more easily amazed and perplexed.

 

For about every person who see's something interesting in my images, I can find another who does not.

This is not based on education level.. Usually it's based more on skeptiscm. Tell someone there are ancient alien structures, and look at their reaction. If they cringe, laugh or doubt it without looking then you allready know what their response will be. However, if they seem interested or go, "oh really"? Then chances are they will find my images interesting.

That really seem's to be how it's divided. But, if it makes you feel better too assume that NOBODY see's anything but rocks in these images then *rock* on.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Let me re-phrase: You see structures that those trained to look at images in NASA, JPL, and university geology/astronomy departments all over the world don't see.

Show me which of these trained/educated experts see what you see.

 

Let's break this down:
ancient - unsupported
alien - there's plenty of you kooks who believe we've already colonized the solar system and 'fell back' to earth

and that's assuming you could support the last one:
(artificial) structures

 

The frustrating aspect too all of this, is that the majority of the images that I've put on here are difficult to locate and some have never been commented on publicly. Not that I've ever seen. I would doubt that they have either.

I've never heard NASA or "these trained/educated experts" say or claim anything about these particular areas. In other words, lets say it's about the anomaly in Magelhaens Crater featured below.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Well, NASA has commented on this crater floor, merely calling it irregular. However, for most of my other "anomalies" they are in obscure locations that can only be seen in extremely rare photographs that are about 15 megabytes to download online.

The only "trained/educated expert" response to some of these finds is an article on Regolith concentrations around craters on Eros and the Moon. While I do think Regolith is the answer for some of the anomalies found, I wish more attention was paid and investigation was done.

Here is the link: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/moon2002/pdf/3048.pdf

Here is another: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2002/pdf/1637.pdf

There is an automatic assumption that anything structure-like on a planet is regolith. However, once ETI is proven for sure to exist, a lot of that will be blown away.

 

If it walks like a duck, etc..........