Hello people So some of you are not impressed with the photos. There are also some photo negatives on the following site: http://www.artbell.com/aliens4.html Now tell me how you can fack negatives. [This message has been edited by Mana (edited January 24, 2000).]
Mana, Huuumm let me see. First these "negitives" had to be scanned in to the computer. Now before they are posted they CAN be faked! Not to hard to figure out. ------------------ My life could have been black and white, but I had to color it.
Who said anything about the negative being fake. It is the clay pidgeon..oops ..alien that is what we should be looking at! .. Ooh!, that's right, it was stolen. How convenient. What the fack is a fack nigitive, anyway Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! I want to see the video and I want a video editing/processing lab to check it out for 3D graphic suite fiddling. Why hasn't this video been made available to everyone by now anyway??? We're all talking about it. Art Bell was talking about it. There is no secret anymore, so cough it up. Let's see the tape. If he's out to make money on it, then it will stink of profiteering!
I'd like to see the video, please. Web author response (A): Due to the dangers and possible repurcussions of releasing the video, it's not safe to do so. We're sorry, however, and encourage you to buy our sorry ass book. Web author response (B): ummm video..yes hmm lets see..........that was uuuhh confiscated by secret agents. Just days ago actually. It's too bad that was our only copy.
I will! Let's see how far I get before I hit the wall of bullsh*t and excuses! Dave.. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
You go, Dave! I've never been impressed with Art Bell anyway, especially after that so-called witch-attack in the studio. ------------------ I may not agree with what you have to say, but I will fight, kill, and die for your right to say it.
Art Bell is perhaps the worst possible representative of UFO-believers that could be found. He invites the wackiest wackos alive, and doesnt question their word at all. He accepts everything at face value, making him extremely susceptible to hoaxes and skewed data. Those photos (especially the spacecraft) are amazingly fake....a Quake 3 screenshot could produce more convincing results.
Here's a photo of the obelisk hovering in my local park! What luck I had a camera handy! <center> Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! </center> Dave..
ok thats nice what sh*te weres the alien man. [This message has been edited by Mana (edited January 26, 2000).]
I have e mailed Mr Reed and asked him to send me a copy of the video. Reply from some web guy "I suspect that some of the video tapes will be played at the upcoming conference in Laughlin. ----- the web guy PS Jonathan and Robert automatically receive copies of mail sent to this email address." Mana Well Reed and Robert better E mail me back.
Great job, Dave! Could you put one of those in my backyard? or, hovering over my house? in my kitchen, bedroom, whatever? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
What about the analysis by Kodak? They concluded the negatives are genuine. What about Dr. Chacons analysis of the tissue sent to him by Gary which is unlike anything cataloged on earth and impossible to fake. If this is all fake noone knows how they are doing it.
Dave-I have been called something that rhymes with "witch"... Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! [This message has been edited by Oxygen (edited January 26, 2000).]
heheheh Hey!! Great picture, Dave! Can we use that in the book??? LOL ------------------ It's all fun
Mana, Yes all of the above. The negative of the obelisk was confirmed genuine and a regular 35mm negative NOT tampered with. If this story is all a hoax then move over David Copperfield theres a new guy on the block. Dave, Don't be so hard on the guy. If I aquired the same documentation you bet I would profit from it who wouldn't? If his ordeal is real and so far I have no reason to believe otherwise then he deserves that and more. [This message has been edited by Alien (edited January 27, 2000).]
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! , I suppose it's a hard call. From where I'm standing, profiteering seems to explain motivation to commit fraud. If he is on the level, he's gotta eat, right? It makes it difficult to decide then if this is a bonafide case or merely another bandwagon rollercoaster ride. On another side note ( pick pick ): What's with him blowing his lunch and freaking out - AFTER some 2 1/2 hours of being there and THEN claiming he thought he was going to lose his mind?? I thought he was a psychologist. Wouldn't he be at least trained enough to keep himself together instead of becoming so hysterical he blew chunks??....AFTER 2 1/2 hours of detailed investigation, filming, clearing brush beneath the craft, falling into the craft, packing the body away, more photographs, more investigation of the surroundings etc etc ??? Don't you normally freak out first - get a grip - compose yourself -THEN get to the task at hand which in this case was documenting the event on film??? I just don't know....... Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! [This message has been edited by Dave (edited January 28, 2000).]
