Atheists

Discussion in 'Religion Archives' started by KalvinB, Nov 30, 2001.

  1. KalvinB Publicity Whore Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,063
    A Word Concerning Atheists

    Everybody lock your doors, get a gun, protect yourself! atheists are planning to prevent me from sleeping soundly at night! As this letter will make clear, it coins polysyllabic neologisms to make its perversions sound like they're actually important. In fact, its treatises are filled to the brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary. More prosaically, if atheists aren't cold-blooded, I don't know who is. So let me make it clear that this is not Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia, where the state would be eager to label everyone atheists doesn't like as a racist, sexist, fascist, communist, or some equally terrible "-ist". Not yet, at least. But you may be wondering why the most bloodthirsty recidivists I've ever seen latch onto atheists's conjectures. It's because people of that nature need to have rhetoric and dogma to recite during times of stress in order to cope. That's also why I cannot compromise with atheists; it is without principles. I cannot reason with it; it is without reason. But I can warn it, and with a warning it must decidedly take to heart: atheists has written volumes about how it is a perpetual victim of injustice. Don't believe a word of it, though. The truth is that its true goal is to strip the world of conversation, friendship, and love. All the statements that its operatives make to justify or downplay that goal are only apologetics; they do nothing to combat the negligent ideology of blackguardism that has infected the minds of so many hectoring, satanic traitors. I'm sorry if I've gotten a little off track here, but atheists favors manipulative psychological techniques over honest discussion. I challenge it to move from its broad derogatory generalizations to specific instances to prove otherwise.

    As crotchety as it might sound, atheists's peons compress atheists's biases into brief, highly reductive, definitive-sounding phrases, easily memorized and easily expressed. But that's not all: Its publicity stunts are rife with contradictions and difficulties; they're utterly jejune, meet no objective criteria, and are unsuited for a supposedly educated population. And as if that weren't enough, if its death squads had even an ounce of integrity, they would address the continued social injustice shown by wretched spoiled brats. Some of the facts I'm about to present may seem shocking. This they certainly are. However, atheists are always prating about how "the norm" shouldn't have to worry about how the exceptions feel. (It used to say that university professors must conform their theses and conclusions to its disorganized, churlish prejudices if they want to publish papers and advance their careers, but the evidence is too contrary, so it's given up on that score.) If you don't think that I will not let myself be forced into anything, then you've missed the whole point of this letter. I correctly predicted that atheists would dominate or intimidate others. Alas, I didn't think it'd do that so effectively -- or so soon. I think I am not alone when I say that when people say that bigotry and hate are alive and well, they're right. And atheists are to blame.

    Please keep in mind that I recommend that we do something about the continuing -- make that the escalating -- effort on atheists's part to bombard me with insults. Consequently, atheists truly believes that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues. I hope you realize that that's just a possession-obsessed pipe dream from a vile pipe, and that in the real world, atheists truly believes that people are pawns to be used and manipulated. It is just such discourteous megalomania, insolent, deluded egoism, and intellectual aberrancy that stirs atheists to pose a threat to the survival of democracy. There is no contradiction here; even though I think this is tragic, you mustn't forget that I cannot believe how many actual, physical, breathing, thinking people have fallen for atheists's subterfuge. I'm completely stunned. atheists does not want to perpetrate acts of the most asinine character because it is immoral, filthy, self-serving, and brutal (though, granted, atheists are all of the aforementioned), but rather because what I just wrote is not based on merely a single experience or anecdote. Rather, it is based upon the wisdom of accumulated years, spanning two continents, and proven by the fact that if atheists succeeds in its attempt to impose tremendous hardships on tens of thousands of decent, hard-working individuals, it'll have to be over my dead body. We could opt to sit back and let atheists go to great lengths to conceal its true aims and mislead the public. Most people, however, would argue that the cost in people's lives and self-esteem is an extremely high price to pay for such inaction on our part.

    What atheists are doing is metagrobolism in its most ugly form. To be more pedantic about it, this is a lesson for those with eyes to see. It is a lesson not so much about atheists's debauched behavior, but about the way that there are two related questions in this matter. The first is to what extent atheists has tried to break down traditional values. The other is whether or not if we let atheists subordinate all spheres of society to an ideological vision of organic community, then greed, corruption, and cynicism will characterize the government. Oppressive measures will be directed against citizens. And lies and deceit will be the stock and trade of the media and educational institutions. atheists's propaganda machine once said that atheists would never funnel significant amounts of money to militant, clumsy scoundrels. So much for credibility! atheists maintains that either its imprecations are good for the environment, human rights, and baby seals or that it is merely trying to make this world a better place in which to live. atheists denies any other possibility.

    One might think that atheists's goal is not to oppose obtrusive totalitarianism but to reinvigorate it with an irascible new purpose, and this is, not surprisingly, the case. All such combinations of audacity with ignorance would be supremely ridiculous but for one consideration: atheists says that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. Wow! Isn't that like hiding the stolen goods in the closet and, when the cops come in, standing in front of the closet door and exclaiming, "They're not in here!"? atheists has found a way to avoid compliance with government regulations, circumvent any further litigation, and dress up its profit motive in the cloak of selfless altruism -- all by trumping up a phony emergency. atheists wants nothing less than to teach the next generation how to hate -- and whom to hate -- hence its repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of its peevish ploys. Of course, atheists's ability to reason from premise to conclusion is nearly non-existent. I say "of course," because if you've read this far, then you probably either agree with me or are on the way to agreeing with me.

    Throughout history, there has been a clash between those who wish to shatter the adage that the Queen of England heads up the international drug cartel and those who wish to make people weak and dependent. Naturally, atheists belongs to the latter category. atheists has been trying for some time to convince people that the health effects of secondhand smoke are negligible. Don't believe its hype! atheists has just been offering that line as a means to retard the free and natural economic development of various countries' indigenous population. Out of the vast number of devastating evils for which careless mob bosses are directly or indirectly responsible, I shall pick out only a single one which is most in keeping with the inner essence of atheists's craven self-fulfilling prophecies: gnosticism. Although everyone has goals, atheists's goal seems to be to disparage and ridicule our traditional heroes and role models. Although some rash finks concede that atheists are a master of psychological manipulation, they invariably deny that atheists disguises its iron fist with a velvet glove. To pretend otherwise is nothing but hypocrisy and unwillingness to face the more unpleasant realities of life.

    Did it ever occur to atheists that maybe there is a cost, a cost too high to calculate, for messing with the lives and livelihoods of thousands of people? Dream on. Even if our society had no social problems at all, we could still say that atheists has stated that it can achieve its goals by friendly and moral conduct. That's just pure feudalism. Well, in atheists's case, it might be pure ignorance, seeing that atheists's plans for the future manifest themselves in two phases. Phase one: sacrifice children on the twin altars of careerism and greed. Phase two: turn back the clock and repeal all the civil rights and anti-discrimination legislation now on the books. Doesn't atheists ever get tired of calling everyone "loquacious dirtbags"? atheists insists that anyone who disagrees with it is ultimately shameless. This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands they perpetrates.

    atheists spouts a lot of numbers whenever it wants to make a point. It then subjectively interprets those numbers to support its contrivances while ignoring the fact that you may make the comment, "What does this have to do with bad-tempered New Age sensualists?" Well, once you begin to see the light, you'll realize that I have a tendency to report the more sensational things that it is up to, the more shocking things, things like how it wants to produce nothing but filth. And I realize the difficulty that the average person has in coming to grips with that, but it tries to make us think the way it wants us to think, not by showing us evidence and reasoning with us, but by understanding how to push our emotional buttons. Last summer, I attempted what I knew would be a hopeless task. I tried to convince atheists that it should practice what it preaches. As I expected, atheists was unconvinced. I have given this issue a great deal of thought, and I now have a strong conviction that the real question here is not, "Why doesn't atheists try doing something constructive for once in its history?". The real question is rather, "Where are the people who are willing to stand up and acknowledge that atheists tends to forget what matters most?" After days of agonized pondering and reflection, I finally came to the conclusion that some people think it's a bit extreme of me to lift the fog from atheists's thinking -- a bit over the top, perhaps. Well, what I ought to remind such people is that atheists wants to eliminate those law-enforcement officers who constitute the vital protective bulwark in the fragile balance between anarchy and tyranny. Why it wants that, I don't know, but that's what it wants.

    atheists may be sincere, but it is also sincerely refractory. atheists's claim that it never engages in headstrong, slatternly, or abysmal politics is factually unsupported and politically motivated. I have the following to say to the assertion that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points: Baloney! I find that I am embarrassed. Embarrassed that some people just don't realize that the hate just keeps on coming. I don't think anyone questions that. But did you know that its deeds are worse than the Black Death of olden times?

    atheists has never gotten ahead because of its hard work or innovative ideas. Rather, all of atheists's successes are due to kickbacks, bribes, black market double-dealing, outright thuggery, and unsavory political intrigue. I don't want to build castles in the air. I don't want to plan things that I can't yet implement. But I do want to set the record straight, because doing so clearly demonstrates how this is a free country, and I maintain we ought to keep it that way. The bottom line is that I have put this letter before you, without any gain to myself, because I care.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Taken Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    599

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    "Taken walks in, looks up, and ducks out quickly before the storm begins"
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Tiassa Let us not launch the boat ... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    37,893
    Taken ...,

    Good advice. Taken. Well, ok. Sorry to play on words. Er ...

    --Tiassa

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Jay Renalsds Registered Member

    Messages:
    27
    Are you just talking about atheists, or everyone who doesn't believe in god? How excatly are you defining atheists here KalvinB? From the few atheists i know personally they are not anything like that.
     
  8. Tiassa Let us not launch the boat ... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    37,893
    Jan Ardena

    Actually, if you pop over to the Faith; among others thread, you'll note that this thesaurus-laden diatribe is generated by a computer. It would appear he's not actually talking about anyone at all.

    thanx,
    Tiassa

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  9. Xerxes asdfghjkl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,830
    It came from a computer. You mean those ones from the 70's?

    Its sounds more like it came directly from his ass and passed a thesaurus on its way out.

    After reaading those first few paragraphs I figured it was something going no where.

    Lets spare KalvinB the erosion of any dignity he still has left.
    I dont know about you guys, but I dont take this guy seriously anymore.
     
  10. Xerxes asdfghjkl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,830
    I just saw it on another thread. I thought you were joking.

    Sorry KalvinB, I jumped too fast.
     
  11. some_guy01 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    81
    okay slow down KalvinB... You look upon Atheists as the scum of society. In which i can tell you that they are not. Where ever you see these atheists that seem to think theses ideas you are looking at just plain dumbasses. How do I know this im one myself. IM a honors student with a 3.7 gpa and am involved in many productive activities(ie key club). You my friend are stereotyping and you cannot do that because everone is different and don't act in the same way. It is true that some athiests are like that, but not all. Your stereotyping can however be easily compared to what is said about christains. They protest at heavy metal concerts, think that if they say one bad word they will be condemed to hell for eternity( i haven't met one, and i know a lot of christians). The truth is that both atheists and christian alike stereotype each other and the majority of the statements are completely false.
     
  12. blonde_cupid Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    427
    some_guy01,

    Thank you for the breath of fresh air. I wish you continued success in your studies but your wisdom beyond your book knowledge will most likely serve you better.
     
  13. Teg Unknown Citizen Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    672
    My blood is probably at or around the temperature of your blood.

    I'm not the one hauled up in a house with a gun!

    I am unfamiliar with this plan, but it has been my observation that these traits are often embodied by your Christian brethren. Your generalizations and specious arguments do not have any weight.

    Slander will get you nowhere. Where is your proof? Of the atheists I know no such traits are apparent. I hope that you do not find this amusing because there are actually people of such a low order of intelligence that they may take you seriously.

    Need I remind you that there are no politicians that claim atheism

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  14. Cris In search of Immortality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,199
    Kalvinb,

    I don't believe you intend your opening post to be taken seriously. You are too intelligent to consider such statements to have any relevance to reality.

    But I am curious to know who you are quoting or where the text originated. It feels very archaic.

    Cris
     

Share This Page