Boeing's Project-Grasp

Discussion in 'Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology' started by bigjnorman, Nov 7, 2003.

  1. bigjnorman Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    158
    <i>The GRASP paper focuses on Podkletnov's claims that his experiments using a device called an "impulse gravity generator" are capable of producing a beam of gravity-like energy that can exert an instantaneous force of 1,000-G on any object.

    Podkletnov maintains a Russian lab has already demonstrated the 4-inch-wide beam's ability to repel objects a kilometer away, with negligible power loss at distances of up to 200 kilometers.
    </i>

    Wow, so many implications, hard to believe though
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Kunax Sciforums:Reality not required Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,385
    sound fun, can you give a link
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. bigjnorman Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    158
    even better

    http://xxx.lanl.gov/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0108/0108005.pdf

    this is a pdf of an experiment showing that a type of "radiation" was indeed occuring and looked just like a gravitational force, except it was repulsive.

    Interesting is the result that this "radiation" would go through brick walls and still accelerate the object just as it would with no brick wall.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. 2inquisitive The Devil is in the details Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,181
    Looks like the time is approaching that a few books may have to
    be altered. This is incredible, if true!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    edit to fix spelling error
     
    Last edited: Nov 8, 2003
  8. 2inquisitive The Devil is in the details Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,181
    I thought this thread would receive a lot more response than it
    has. Is it because this is a new "force" not described in present
    physics and physicists don't have an opinion yet? Or is it because
    General Relativity seems to view it as "impossible", therefore it
    has to be a mistake or a lie?
    Why was this posted under the Astronomy forum instead of Physics?
     
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2003
  9. ElectricFetus Sanity going, going, gone Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,523
    It actually making an anti-gravity beam? I have heard about the concept before. Hope it can be verified.

    Here are some links I found on this discover:
    http://www.gravity-society.org/abstract_AIAA.htm
    http://www.rialian.com/rnboyd/podkletnov.htm
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2157975.stm
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2159487.stm

    This is not good:
    "Has the experiment been repeated by others?

    Several teams have tried but none has seen the same thing. The American space agency Nasa tried but said it couldn't find any effect. "
     
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2003
  10. bigjnorman Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    158
    yes, i believe it would mark a new era of science,

    I just have a hard time believing that this thing is a fake, as many U.S. companies have recently jumped into it all of a sudden, I think the gov. just wants everyone to think its bullshit.
     
  11. 2inquisitive The Devil is in the details Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,181
    I agree with you bigjnorman, the implications of an "anti-gravity
    beam" are immense. Mainstream science seems to view it as a
    challenge to General Relativity. Boeing and the military can also
    view it as a weapon, to knock satillites out of orbit or to deflect
    incoming missiles, for example.
     

Share This Page