New technology

Discussion in 'Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology' started by Lyndale, Jul 9, 2001.

  1. Lyndale Registered Member

    Messages:
    25
    I altered the electronics in my photography equipment (video cameras and 35mm etc)and something happened. I now pick up images of faces...all with 2 eyes, mouth, facial structures and expressions.

    I have attached one picture to this topic.
    If you want to see more and learn more concerning this topic go to

    http://members.theglobe.com/1lyndale/discovery/

    here I explain further in detail.

    Lyndale

    I HAVE JUST UPDATED MY HOMEPAGE...CHECK IT OUT. JULY 11th.
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2001
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Que Registered Member

    Messages:
    20
    Regarding the subject of "Did we go to the Moon" and all those who believe in Government Conspiracies and and what not.

    Keep this fact in mind..

    The only way three people can keep a secret is if two of them are dead..

    There were thousands involved in the moon missions

    Me...
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Que Registered Member

    Messages:
    20
    how or why this post wound up here I'll never know
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Chagur .Seeker. Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,235
    Like maybe because Lyndale didn't want to put it under 'Pseudoscience'?

    Welcome aboard, Que.

    Chagur
     
  8. Lyndale Registered Member

    Messages:
    25
    About this my website

    Someone is trying to trash my site. If a Ad banner pops up dont worry this is all that it is. I am in the process of seeking legal prosecution. Sorry for any inconvience. Also I have up dated the information there, go and look.
    http://members.theglobe.com/1lyndale/discovery/
    Thanks.
    Lyndale.
     
  9. kmguru Staff Member

    Messages:
    11,757
    I think I have seen this posting in another forum. My suggestion to Lyndale will be to take your electronic gear and have it professionally repaired to the original spec. Then if you pick up stuff, let us know.

    (Never monkey with electronics unless you are a circuit designer. During my college days, I earned a few bucks repairing other peoples botched gadgets)
     
  10. Rambler Senior Member Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    509
    LYNDALE,

    Nice scam....

    I checked out your site.....$500 (sorry $100) to break someones camera..... god damn Lyndale and you say you've already got $75000 out of it!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    There's some dumb arses out there....
     
  11. Lyndale Registered Member

    Messages:
    25
    Even if you don't ...

    ...pay, you still owe it to yourselves to think twice about what I have found. I didn't lie about any of this. These things are real and I realize now, that all the proof in the world will not change some minds and for those, I feel so sorry for you.

    God is and so is evil. Please, if He is allowing mankind to know about this now, this may be a prelude to the rapture. Please at least think twice about the decesions you made, concerning God. He is comming again.

    "I did not lie about the material in my site".

    Lyndale.
     
  12. Lyndale Registered Member

    Messages:
    25
  13. Crisp Gone 4ever Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,339
    Okay, I'll try one more time

    Hi Lyndale,

    Okay, please let me try to convince you of the fact that your mind is playing tricks on you (and this is not ment in an offensive way).

    1) The tampering with the electronics introduced a digital jitter in the images.
    2) You are looking for something in the jitter and you found something. The mind tries to associate objects it does not know with known objects (this is the way the human memory works, to recall a memory you need an association to that memory).
    3) The mind cannot immediatelly find something to associate the digital jitter with, so it falls back to the default mode: faces. I recently saw a documentary on the human face (yeah, the John Cleese one) and appearantly psychologists have found that a baby's first memory is the face of the mother (just to show how important faces are in the human memory).

    Anyway, that's about the best pseudo-scientific explanation I can give for it. I am sure someone with a better knowledge of the human psyche will do a better job (anybody wants to try ?)

    Bye!

    Crisp
     
  14. wet1 Wanderer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,616
    One of the things people do well is see things. Real or imagined. If you want ot see something you will. Even on a blank wall.
     
  15. Lyndale Registered Member

    Messages:
    25
    Re: Okay, I'll try one more time

    Crisp

    Go to the site again, I just lightened up those pictures. I think they are easier to see now.
    Now tell me, that all those circles I placed there, don't contain a face with 2 eyes, 1 mouth, facial expressions, head structure's and etc...
    and that all of this is chance?
    There's no way.
    Those are real faces that my equipment is picking up.
    You can say, "fake", "luck" or what ever until your blue in the face, makes no difference.
    What I have is real and you know it.
    You know what I think? I think your scared I am right and that means...you have a lot of re-thinking to do, don't you.
    Lyndale.
     
  16. kmguru Staff Member

    Messages:
    11,757
    Play it again Sam

    I think I have seen this posting in another forum. My suggestion to Lyndale will be to take your electronic gear and have it professionally repaired to the original spec. Then if you pick up stuff, let us know.

    (Never monkey with electronics unless you are a circuit designer. During my college days, I earned a few bucks repairing other peoples botched gadgets)
     
  17. Crisp Gone 4ever Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,339
    Hrm

    Hi Lyndale,

    With a lot of imagination I can see perhaps two or three "face-like" structures in all of the areas you circled.

    The "best" match of a face would be the curtain picture. However, the structure that appears to be an "eye" re-appears all over the image (example, right above corner) without a face or mouth or other structure nearby it. This strengthens my assumption that we are just looking at digital rubbish that accidently is aligned in a way.

    If you keep staring long enough at an image, you will always see something - especially if you're looking for something in particular. I remember a practical joke a friend of mine and I once pulled on someone. We were on a tour in a research center, and to prevent us from getting lost, we were all handed a plan of the facility. As a joke, my friend and I told others that if you turned the plan upside down and looked closely at it, you would recognize a rabbit. And sure enough, some people did. The truth was that there was simply nothing. The eye can play dirty tricks on the mind.

    Bye!

    Crisp
     
  18. Chagur .Seeker. Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,235
    Crisp ...

    Surprised you didn't bring up the Rorschach Test, the infamous 'ink blot' test, that depends on the individual's ability to organize random, meaningless designs in a meaningful way.
     
  19. Lyndale Registered Member

    Messages:
    25
    I know they're every where

    I know they're every where in the pictures....I don't know why but the process picks up everything....I am not sure I can explain this to your satisfaction.

    I've learned from watching them...that for what ever reason the process also causes "overlapping" .

    To kinda see what I am talking about Go back and look at the bottom left picture and look a little to the left.....do you see the one I circles that also as a little bit of another circle in it <this is what I am referring to.

    This process is more apparent when I place them in my computer. I believe it also as to do with my display settings...because if you blow up one of those pictures you will see the square pixels.

    I dont know if any of this is making any sense...but I do know that I didnt fake these pics. That is impossible to do.
    By anyone. And I know that the odds of what the end results are, are too astronomical to allow this to happen by only chance.

    Cris, I am telling you the truth. This is real. I am not crazy. I am not wasting my time for nothing. I do have better things to do. Believe it or not.

    Please at least keep your options open......God is.

    Think about this.....If you could do anything you could imagin and one day you decided to create your own world ...would you build a world full of robots or a world with free will?
    ...and being that special to begin with....would'nt one of the reasons you were doing so to begin with....was fellowship with your creation?....
    ...just for one moment place yourself in God's shoes and think about why everything is the way that it is.
    Believe it or not ...perfect order, can be boring....maybe, kaos brings a little spice.

    Just food for thought.

    If I were you, I'd keep my options open concerning God.

    Take care.
    Lyndale.
     
  20. Crisp Gone 4ever Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,339
    Yeah

    Hi all,

    Chagur: Thanks! I was looking for the name of the test but I just couldn't remember it at the time of writing (and too lazy to look it up, you know how it goes). But indeed: the Rorschach test exactly proves my point.

    Lyndale: Nobody (at least not here that I am aware of) is accusing you of having faked those pics. We're just pointing out that the jitter you see is normal. I am not into photography, but it seems quite normal that if you take a picture of a dark lit place and brighten it a lot (eg in the color green) that even the slighest minuscule difference between "black" and "not entirely black but almost indistinguishable to the human eye" gets totally blown out of proportion, creating the heavy jittered images you see. All that follows is a matter of psychology.

    Perhaps I am just taking the situation a bit too much in an academic way (with not really enough room for the supernatural) but it sounds quite logical to me. You are free to disagree ofcourse.

    Bye!

    Crisp
     

Share This Page