What is really behind the virus crisis?

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by Xelasnave.1947, Mar 29, 2020.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    hot damn sexy bitch !
    flex your main thrusters & lets launch this party
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    not sure
    ive watched a few of his speeches
    and he is text book whack job evangelical preacher material
    with a twist of something a bit serial killer painted as the middle guy skeptic(but it looks like an ugly monster sitting under there that he cant control)

    i shall try and remind myself to have a look for what your talking about
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. David C On planet earth Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    445
    Bullshit. The "info" you posted is out of context, manipulated crap. No better than a tabloid headline!.

    I'd bet most of them think you are a serial forum spammer who seems to be defending this at all costs and STILL ignoring responses.

    Thankfully you are not the representative of the views of other people. Your biased and twisted view of the world may have put you in a terminal woo woo box, but genuinely honest people look at all the evidence. You are incapable of doing that.

    The moronic circular logic of the delusional. You convince yourself of something, when it is clearly not saying what you think it is saying. You then use this as a ridiculous generalisation to suggest that EVERY mainstream source and EVERY scientist is lying and all so you can prop up the views of idiots. How absurd are you!

    Now, yet again you quoted that paragraph and ignored it. The "viewers" can see that:


    "To put this into context, you are suggesting that a whole barrage of scientists lie, based on your pathetic attempt to poison the well, with some half-assed "assessment" concerning RAND - a ridiculous generalisation from a completely unscientific claim! Is the weapon dangerous? Yes. Is the depleted uranium? No. Would the depleted uranium be maybe dangerous if you chucked a few tons of it at your enemy. Probably. BUT, the waste from the lead and mercury would be orders of magnitude worse! So your other pathetic attempt, without ANY scientific analysis, or rigor, to pin the deformities on the RAND report on DU is also bullshit."


    Edit: From here. Wow, the "shills" working this forum are looking like "horses arses" and the moderators are going to shut you down because you are "winning". I think you are genuinely suffering from mental delusion.
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    930
    Have you looked at this info? It doesn't sound like you have.

    https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=depleted uranium iraq deformities&qs=n&form=QBIR&sp=-1&pq=depleted uranium iraq deformities&sc=0-33&cvid=DB09ED9C69B44B50B53A6410E96278A3&first=1&tsc=ImageBasicHover

    Talk - Dr. Doug Rokke - Depleted Uranium (DU)



    If you defend the Rand memo (see post #81) after seeing this, you're not fit to discuss covid.
     
  8. David C On planet earth Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    445
    Have you looked at the responses and material related to the real dangers - lead and mercury! I KNOW you haven't.


    Spamming your off topic video again!

    Doug Rokke - RationalWiki

    "Doug Rokke is a crank and conspiracy theorist obsessed with depleted uraniumconspiracy theories. He claims to have been a researcher and major with a Ph.D. in Health Physics in the 3rd U.S. Army Medical Command's Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical research team as a scientific expert on depleted uranium[1] The Department of Defense states he was helping administrate the US Army Chemical School on Fort McClellan (with a Ph.D. in Education Methodology) and logistical support for Army Munitions and Chemical Command (special equipment purchasing) until being fired.[2] Rokke's experience in physics, from his own admission during talks, comes from a BS in general physics and his office being located in the physics area while completing his doctorate. Rokke has also stated depleted uranium was completely unknown to him before 1991."

    Your pathetic gullibility is laughable. It's on youtube therefore it must be the truf! Your "assessment" of my credibility or what I am fit to discuss is irrelevant. You are a very ignorant layman who avoids EVERY single point of research that is NOT woo-woo. You use a self-supporting circular logic nonsense argument to do this.

    You're not fit to discuss anything, I've never seen an honest response from you and you have been splattering your garbage all over the internet for 20 years. Oh and look, you avoided the reply for the 4th time.

    "To put this into context, you are suggesting that a whole barrage of scientists lie, based on your pathetic attempt to poison the well, with some half-assed "assessment" concerning RAND - a ridiculous generalisation from a completely unscientific claim! Is the weapon dangerous? Yes. Is the depleted uranium? No. Would the depleted uranium be maybe dangerous if you chucked a few tons of it at your enemy. Probably. BUT, the waste from the lead and mercury would be orders of magnitude worse! So your other pathetic attempt, without ANY scientific analysis, or rigor, to pin the deformities on the RAND report on DU is also bullshit."
     
  9. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    930
  10. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,270
    Mod Note

    This may be the conspiracies sub-forum, but peddling dangerous anti-vaxxer conspiracies, dodgy cures and slanderous accusations, particularly during a time of a pandemic is not acceptable.

    FatFreddy has been temporarily banned due to accrued infraction points.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page