What is really behind the virus crisis?

These are the articles I was referring to.

Scientists at the Rand Corporation say that depleted uranium is safe.
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/docs/b04151999_bt170-99.htm

There are other scientists who say the opposite.
http://www.google.es/search?q=depleted uranium&tbs=vid:1

Look at this too.
https://www.bing.com/images/search?...0B53A6410E96278A3&first=1&tsc=ImageBasicHover

Do you believe what the article from Rand says?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Thanks for proving my point.

This is what the article from Rand says.

And that was translated as ; Scientists at the Rand Corporation say that depleted uranium is safe.

Now do you see the duplicity in the "quoted passage"?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Look at the whole article. It's obviously damage-control. The effects of depleted uranium on the Iraqi people and US soldiers were devastating.
https://www.bing.com/search?q=doug rokke depleted uranium&FORM=HDRSC1

Beyond Treason Full HD 2005



Do you think the US government is being honest about the effects of depleted uranium?


edit
----------------------------------------

Talk - Dr. Doug Rokke - Depleted Uranium (DU)

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

No, you are going to post your idiotic spam about the Moon landings, off topic! This business about depleted uranium is a pathetic generalisation made from a hyped study. You have spammed THIS everywhere too and ignored responses.

Debunking The Apollo Moon Hoax: Whistleblowers, governments and lies. (debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com)
"Summary:-
This section of the "wall of spam" highlights two points that massively contradict each other. We have the premise that scientists and governments lie, "demonstrated" with whistleblowers and articles written and spoken by numerous individuals very much alive. We then have the premise that nobody would speak out about Apollo because they would fear for their lives! BUNKUM!"

And from previous spamming of this crap:
"To put this into context, you are suggesting that a whole barrage of scientists lie, based on your pathetic attempt to poison the well, with some half-assed "assessment" concerning RAND - a ridiculous generalisation from a completely unscientific claim! Is the weapon dangerous? Yes. Is the depleted uranium? No. Would the depleted uranium be maybe dangerous if you chucked a few tons of it at your enemy. Probably. BUT, the waste from the lead and mercury would be orders of magnitude worse! So your other pathetic attempt, without ANY scientific analysis, or rigor, to pin the deformities on the RAND report on DU is also bullshit."

 

basic science "were devastating"
versus
"is devastating"
which one serves the ends and means ?
in which case it would be the surviving radiated patients whom ARE suffering
not "were suffering"
[what is the point of the grammar change, to emotionally distance yourself from real people and suffering?]
surely the patient should come first
are you referring to those whom are now dead, because otherwise they have recovered
i doubt they have recovered if they are still alive


depleted uranium poisoning in iraq from usa depleted uranium munitions is behind the covid19 pandemic ?

where is the connection ?

subject narrative
science note
we are discussing medical science
what-is-really-behind-the-virus-crisis

so it only seems logical to include

"Gulf War Syndrome"
as it was named
was a combination effect of terrible PTSD & poisoning and fatigue of military personal in the Gulf war invasion

history has been re-written to service usa private interests to prevent suing people i expect

when talking depleted uranium radiation poisoning
there is 2 different subject headings
1 gulf war syndrome,
which includes PTSD and various other things combined as toxic shock damage and injury to soldiers
AND
specific site documented exposure to depleted uranium

soo... in the event you choose to follow some spin doctor off into their scamy rabbit hole to spend on your credit card

be sure to know before hand what specifically the fuck they are talking about
because you want science not bullshit.
unless your a farmer looking for bullshit
in which case you will never see the product
only the bill on your credit card

and
because the thread subject is about science
what-is-really-behind-the-virus-crisis

keep in mind
PTSD was actively denied as a diagnosis to avoid suing the USA government for many years
... which is a whole different subject
and another subject you should not be getting your credit card out to spend on some
junky-fix-psycho-ministers-new-age-self-help-cure-all-bullshit

"just harden up with god to cure your radiation poisoning while acting effeminate" is not a way to apply modern medical science

 

So do you people think the Rand article was objective? Do you think it was misleading. Do you think it was playing down the dangers of DU? Be clear.

This is an objectivity test.

 

It isn't a bloody objectivity test at all! Your opinion is biased and ignorant on this subject, how the hell do you set the criteria for objectivity when you have no credentials to assess such a thing!

This crap is just you dragging yet another thread off topic and avoiding responses. You quoted that text and then completely ignored it. Try again.

"To put this into context, you are suggesting that a whole barrage of scientists lie, based on your pathetic attempt to poison the well, with some half-assed "assessment" concerning RAND - a ridiculous generalisation from a completely unscientific claim! Is the weapon dangerous? Yes. Is the depleted uranium? No. Would the depleted uranium be maybe dangerous if you chucked a few tons of it at your enemy. Probably. BUT, the waste from the lead and mercury would be orders of magnitude worse! So your other pathetic attempt, without ANY scientific analysis, or rigor, to pin the deformities on the RAND report on DU is also bullshit."

 

Yep. Indeed, one of the reason the report concludes that DU is not unreasonably dangerous is that soldiers have been living with DU shrapnel in them for decades. If that had been lead or mercury they would have been dead by now.

 

this self anointing wanna be neo evangelical hyper liberal elitist playing the working mans man ?
only thing i would trust him to do is create and run his own cult

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Is he the one who created a certification something to do with eyes and certified himself?

That sounds like a cult

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

I thought you people would just tap dance around this instead of answering it directly.

That is a very misleading report that plays down the dangers of depleted uranium and you people are defending it. Rant all you want; the viewers have seen your reactions.

I'm just a layman so I can't really opine on this. All I can do is listen to all the experts and try to see who makes the most sense and see if any of them get caught in lies.

There's the theory that the virus jumped from an animal to people. There's a theory that the virus was made in a Chinese laboratory. There's a theory that the virus was made in an American laboratory and smuggled into China.

Start watching this at the 2:30 time mark.

Anthony Fauci is a liar, a traitor, and a murderer
https://www.newstarget.com/2021-05-16-del-bigtree-covid-is-biological-weapon.html


Is Wuhan virus a hit job? A whodunit not to miss. Uriah Heep, our Sherlock Holmes solves the case!



I don't have a firm opinion on this.

 

I can't believe you even cited that insidious LIE.

Anthony Fauci, Director, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/voices/events/fauci/#

And you dare question the integrity of this eminent physician who has dedicated his entire life in an effort to save millions of people from horrible diseases, based on a rumor without any evidential substance?

(whispers) "Hey, I have bridge I can sell you".

George C. Parker (March 16, 1860[1] – 1936)

I bet you like Trump, do you?

 

No. I like Ralph Nader.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ralph nader

 

It's been answered you joke! It is NOT misleading at all. It covers the issues surrounding USA soldier exposure to it. The lead and mercury is vastly, VASTLY more toxic!

I've taken your quotes and put it in the correct context. To make it really accurate, you are a very ignorant layman who makes no effort to educate yourself. You stick ONLY to woo-woo sites.

The viewers? These would be the people who hold you in as much esteem as something on their shoe?

That is the opposite of what you do and you are not qualified to determine whether an expert is lying! You ignore every majority expert and listen to idiots,

Bullshit - you defend it as though your life depended on it. Now, once again!

You quoted that text and then completely ignored it. Try again.

"To put this into context, you are suggesting that a whole barrage of scientists lie, based on your pathetic attempt to poison the well, with some half-assed "assessment" concerning RAND - a ridiculous generalisation from a completely unscientific claim! Is the weapon dangerous? Yes. Is the depleted uranium? No. Would the depleted uranium be maybe dangerous if you chucked a few tons of it at your enemy. Probably. BUT, the waste from the lead and mercury would be orders of magnitude worse! So your other pathetic attempt, without ANY scientific analysis, or rigor, to pin the deformities on the RAND report on DU is also bullshit."

 

I might as well just post stuf for the viewers to see.

Dr.Sherri Tenpenny, Correct terminology not shedding, 70% of the vaccinated people will Die/Dead
https://www.brighteon.com/ee30362a-5618-4878-98b8-a404ad9465ab

FOLLOW FOR MORE INFO ON COVID VAX INJURIES
https://www.brighteon.com/b5861adf-4526-4230-ae42-09b231c17193

 

That is incorrect. 100% of all people will Die/Dead. But only a very small percent of vaccinated people will die from Covid.

A small percentage of people fully vaccinated against COVID-19 will still develop COVID-19 illness

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/201...measure-effectiveness/breakthrough-cases.html

 

Fauci is KILLING Americans by refusing them safe and effective covid remedies
https://www.newstarget.com/2021-05-13-fauci-killing-americans-refusing-safe-covid-remedies.html

The Treatment of Viral Diseases: Has the Truth Been Suppressed for Decades?
https://www.jpands.org/vol25no3/merritt.pdf

Calif. doctor successfully cures 1,700 COVID-19 patients



DR SIMONE GOLD PLEDGES TO MAKE HYDROXYCLOROQUINE AN OTC0 DRUG, LIKE IT IS IN MANY MALARIA COUNTRIES.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/hhzDMXY3nmRL/

TEN MEDICAL FACTS REGARDING THE COVID-19 EXPERIMENTAL VACCINES
https://www.americasfrontlinedoctor...0-Facts-Experimental-Vaccine-Cole-4-12-21.pdf

PROFESSOR DOLORES CAHILL: WHY PEOPLE WILL START DYING A FEW MONTHS AFTER THE FIRST MRNA VACCINATION (incl PDF)
https://philosophers-stone.info/202...-few-months-after-the-first-mrna-vaccination/

 

Dr Vernon Coleman: ‘Doctors And Nurses Giving The Covid-19 Vaccine Will Be Tried As War Criminals’
https://humansarefree.com/2021/02/d...9-vaccine-will-be-tried-as-war-criminals.html

https://vernoncoleman.org/articles/how-many-people-are-vaccines-killing

 

Just in case you were wondering, I reported your blatant off topic thread derailing. I guess you want to see how far you can push things and have something to report to your "viewers" at the basketball forum. You have basically started derailing with your Rand bullshit as a means to disregard all scientists, something you have posted on about 50+ forums as part of your wall of spam. You massively contradict yourself and are too ignorant to understand why.

You quoted that text and then completely ignored it. Try again.

"To put this into context, you are suggesting that a whole barrage of scientists lie, based on your pathetic attempt to poison the well, with some half-assed "assessment" concerning RAND - a ridiculous generalisation from a completely unscientific claim! Is the weapon dangerous? Yes. Is the depleted uranium? No. Would the depleted uranium be maybe dangerous if you chucked a few tons of it at your enemy. Probably. BUT, the waste from the lead and mercury would be orders of magnitude worse! So your other pathetic attempt, without ANY scientific analysis, or rigor, to pin the deformities on the RAND report on DU is also bullshit."

 

You're ignoring the info I posted. I'd bet most of the viewers aren't though. Anyone who looks at the info I posted can see that you're tap dancing around because you're checkmated.

I wouldn't call this off-topic. You people seemed to have a naive willingness to believe when you looked at the official version of things. That made me want to show you an obvious official lie to see how you reacted to it. Anyone who checks out the info I posted can see that the Rand memo is an obvious lie. You people defended it. That pretty much shows everybody what you people are.

https://www.clubconspiracy.com/counter-intellegience-tricks-and-techniques-t4702.html