Population Control, Consumer Regulation & Panic Buying

RainbowSingularity

RainbowSingularity

Valued Senior Member
plastic (bag)bans(pollution bans/regulations)
children's lunch bans
children's school food bans for other children's allergy's
school budget limits & restrictions
School fees
child limits per couple
food rights for children
medical rights for children
(i do not wish to talk about guns/weapons rights or free speech rights int his as the expectation is strick gun control & anti abusive basic laws on free speech)
is there any cohesive moral doctrine to formulate the correlative associations of perceptional relationships to panic buying behavior & motive to self define as a form of expected rights inside a group model ?

this is a concept inside a non armed civilian multi cultural society
where concepts of rights exist at the upper end of modern civilization
equally access to food shelter & healthcare
(not a typical American society)

conceptual liberalism inside a model of collective equal rights

should numbers of children be controlled per couple ?
equally
those who openly oppose those regulations
who do they support to have equal access to their own level of government assistance ?

what is the difference between their expected access to resources
versus
what is their actions to take, gather & hoard ?

if you do not understand advanced human rights & multiculturalism
feel free to ask a well considered question

given the above comments of base line norms

how do we moderate peoples consumption of resources(including how many children they choose to have & what level of education their children get & what level of unemployment & universal health care) while maintaining open equal access ?
(this is the next level of advanced human civilization management issues)

feel free to post your opinion, any obvious & deliberate trolling will be reported
 
RainbowSingularity said:
plastic (bag)bans(pollution bans/regulations)
children's lunch bans
children's school food bans for other children's allergy's
school budget limits & restrictions
School fees
child limits per couple
food rights for children
medical rights for children
(i do not wish to talk about guns/weapons rights or free speech rights int his as the expectation is strick gun control & anti abusive basic laws on free speech)
is there any cohesive moral doctrine to formulate the correlative associations of perceptional relationships to panic buying behavior & motive to self define as a form of expected rights inside a group model ?

this is a concept inside a non armed civilian multi cultural society
where concepts of rights exist at the upper end of modern civilization
equally access to food shelter & healthcare
(not a typical American society)

conceptual liberalism inside a model of collective equal rights

should numbers of children be controlled per couple ?
equally
those who openly oppose those regulations
who do they support to have equal access to their own level of government assistance ?

what is the difference between their expected access to resources
versus
what is their actions to take, gather & hoard ?

if you do not understand advanced human rights & multiculturalism
feel free to ask a well considered question

given the above comments of base line norms

how do we moderate peoples consumption of resources(including how many children they choose to have & what level of education their children get & what level of unemployment & universal health care) while maintaining open equal access ?
(this is the next level of advanced human civilization management issues)

feel free to post your opinion, any obvious & deliberate trolling will be reported
Click to expand...

Good ol' Thomas Malthus.....
he might not have guessed where his ideas would lead within a couple of centuries?!

Neo-Malthusianism is the advocacy of human population planning to ensure resources and environmental integrities for current and future human populations as well as for other species.[2] In Britain the term 'Malthusian' can also refer more specifically to arguments made in favour of preventive birth control, hence organizations such as the Malthusian League.[8] Neo-Malthusians differ from Malthus's theories mainly in their support for the use of contraception. Malthus, a devout Christian, believed that "self-control" (i.e., abstinence) was preferable to artificial birth control. He also worried that the effect of contraceptive use would be too powerful in curbing growth, conflicting with the common 18th century perspective (to which Malthus himself adhered) that a steadily growing population remained a necessary factor in the continuing "progress of society," generally. Modern neo-Malthusians are generally more concerned than Malthus with environmental degradation and catastrophic famine than with poverty.
Click to expand...
 
Dennis Tate said:
ol' Thomas Malthus.....
Click to expand...
that a steadily growing population remained a necessary factor in the continuing "progress of society,"
Click to expand...
false economics based on boom n bust ideology that requires fossil fuels to never run out and a never ending unlimited supply of resources that have no limit.
designed to exploit inflation as a never ending free money service to the rich elite
still a very common cult that is believed by many so called "normal" people from poor to upper class.

river said:
At some point the world can only feed so many .
Click to expand...
there is no shortage of food
just a shortage of people willing to sell it at cost to feed those in poorer low currency value countries.

lack of food production in highly arable land is a huge issue and is dominated by tribal Waring violence.

colonialism would solve this by installing a military dictatorship
but that is not very popular
they prefer tribal wars genocides & starvation & military dictatorships
 
Last edited:
RainbowSingularity said:
false economics based on boom n bust ideology that requires fossil fuels to never run out and a never ending unlimited supply of resources that have no limit.

still a very common cult that is believed by many so called "normal" people from poor to upper class.


there is no shortage of food
just a shortage of people willing to sell it at cost to feed those in poorer low currency value countries.

lack of food production in highly arable land is a huge issue and is dominated by tribal Waring violence.

colonialism would solve this by installing a military dictatorship
but that is not very popular
they prefer tribal wars genocides & starvation
Click to expand...

& on the flip side of that market process
you have places like Myanmar which has a very good developing local market economy
and instead of developing it
the military dictatorship have taken it over & now likely to create starvation as the economic system collapses.
military are now executing people in the streets with impunity no trial or judicial system just socio-political genocide
its crazy
fyi im anti death penalty so a judicial system to validate killing people is not my preference as a symbolic fake process as a judicial system.

why Myanmar when they were making a stand against border issues & seeking to reduce populations ?
all their people were supporting it
while the world said stop ethnic cleansing
now the military is doing what ?
total madness heading toward north Korea mass starvation military dictatorship type of thing

↑
ol' Thomas Malthus.....
that a steadily growing population remained a necessary factor in the continuing "progress of society,"​
false economics based on boom n bust ideology that requires fossil fuels to never run out and a never ending unlimited supply of resources that have no limit.
Click to expand...

Agreed

still a very common cult that is believed by many so called "normal" people from poor to upper class.
Click to expand...

Our planet has its limits .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
At some point the world can only feed so many . [quote/]


there is no shortage of food

just a shortage of people willing to sell it at cost to feed those in poorer low currency value countries.

lack of food production in highly arable land is a huge issue and is dominated by tribal Waring violence.

colonialism would solve this by installing a military dictatorship
but that is not very popular
they prefer tribal wars genocides & starvation & military dictatorships
Click to expand...

Agreed . We have lost our way .
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
river said:
Our planet has its limits .
Click to expand...
climate change will sort it before human financial market leaders will
the financial cult people will only do what they are forced to do, after they have been forced & punished then outlawed.
that is how the system works.

a great leap forward is required in ethics morality & basic economic principals
the gap between India & china reaching 1st world industrialization & climate change wiping out the modern world is merged
keep in mind around 60% of americans think climate change is a hoax and will gladly watch and help India & china & other countrys wipe out the modern world & the environment
luckily it appears china may be seeking to change that outcome
India appears to be seeking to change its economics systems as a 1st step

i will steer the subject premise back towards my point in a while, i am yet to make my point for this thread subject
i wanted to open up discussion around the ideas 1st

edited

Agreed . We have lost our way .
Click to expand...

usa seems to be lost inside ita greed for weapons and to normalize the militarization of their common social public interaction forcing a bloody kill or be killed social mentality into normal everyday life
like a psychopath demanding victims watch their horror.
equally with their death penalty & anti abortion stance.
fairly common in all parts of the world in different flavors & degrees
 
Last edited:
RainbowSingularity said:
climate change will sort it before human financial market leaders will
the financial cult people will only do what they are forced to do, after they have been forced & punished then outlawed.
that is how the system works.

a great leap forward is required in ethics morality & basic economic principals
the gap between India & china reaching 1st world industrialization & climate change wiping out the modern world is merged
keep in mind around 60% of americans think climate change is a hoax and will gladly watch and help India & china & other countrys wipe out the modern world & the environment
luckily it appears china may be seeking to change that outcome
India appears to be seeking to change its economics systems as a 1st step

i will steer the subject premise back towards my point in a while, i am yet to make my point for this thread subject
i wanted to open up discussion around the ideas 1st

edited



usa seems to be lost inside ita greed for weapons and to normalize the militarization of their common social public interaction forcing a bloody kill or be killed social mentality into normal everyday life
like a psychopath demanding victims watch their horror.
equally with their death penalty & anti abortion stance.
fairly common in all parts of the world in different flavors & degrees
Click to expand...

trump as well .
 
river said:
trump as well .
Click to expand...

i am not sure how you mean him, in regard to which particular actions or policy/belief concepts.
i was pro wall but not 1 that sank the countrys ecconomy
it became impracticable & a dog whistle for Racism & xenophobia
watching that racism & xenophobia spread faster than covid in high schools was mind boggling.

i was inspired when he declared a massive govt infrastructure spend
then disappointed he did not carry it out

politically i am a mixed market centrist, which places me politically to the left of the common American democratic party which appear to be anti universal health care & anti universal unemployment benefit.
thus i would never be an American republican voter regardless if Jesus himself stood for them.
i simply do not agree with their core moral principals of making people fight against each other for the basic needs in life, food shelter healthcare etc.
that's not my moral belief system.

writers editorial note(me)
narrator voice(also me)

a lot of people who may consider themselves modern and well intellectually considered can not & do not formulate their own moral position on concepts of basic needs as a position of core national policy
they tend to swing from one opposing warring camp to the other depending on their temporary emotional slight
... so keep that in mind when reading & discussing this subject as most people will talk idealistic bullshit & common interpretations yet have no real comprehension of logical formation of the reasons why & if and when they would follow, adopt or enact such concepts.

they are mostly monkey see monkey do which is why body language is the dominant social language
 
Last edited:
RainbowSingularity said:
i am not sure how you mean him, in regard to which particular actions or policy/belief concepts.

i was inspired when he declared a massive govt infrastructure spend
then disappointed he did not carry it out

politically i am a mixed market centrist, which places me politically to the left of the common American democratic party which appear to be anti universal health care & anti universal unemployment benefit.
thus i would never be an American republican voter regardless if Jesus himself stood for them.
i simply do not agree with their core moral principals of making people fight against each other for the basic needs in life, food shelter healthcare etc.
that's not my moral belief system.
Click to expand...

Highlighted

How so ?
 
RainbowSingularity said:
language
Population Control, Consumer Regulation & Panic Buying
Click to expand...

RainbowSingularity said:
politically i am a mixed market centrist, which places me politically to the left of the common American democratic party which appear to be anti universal health care & anti universal unemployment benefit.
Click to expand...

river said:
Highlighted

How so ?
Click to expand...

asking me to speak further on a subject by faking a question of interest to assert a sense of involvement is disingenuous
however
your question needs relative concept
it needs some scope of meaning to frame a logical reply

your question highlights your lack of understanding of basic political principals which is very common
who did you vote for ?
 
Last edited:
river said:
I'm Not American , Canadian .

Who would I have voted for If I was American , Biden .
Click to expand...

who did you last vote for and why ?
(just very basic main 3 points you voted for the party you voted for)

river said:
Who would I have voted for If I was American , Biden .
Click to expand...

im sure Canada has its own extremist political organizations so your question is yet again moving toward the nature of a troll question

[e.g/i.e]did you vote to support the tar/oil sands open cast mining ?
did you vote to support indigenous north American tribes ?

morality up for sale to the highest bidder ?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top