B.H. being black-holes . At Galactic Center , the Globular Core . If there was a B.H. at the core of our galaxy , then the magnetic field should be reducing in area ; And increasing in intensity .
I was going to ignore your usual crap river, but anyway, here I am....In short, bullshit. A BH with a magnetic field [a Kerr-Newman] would not be magnetic for long as it absorbed opposite charge. The other unlikley scenario is the Reisner Nordström metric BH...unlikely because this is static as opposed to rotating. Any magnetic fields associated with BH's are probably from the accretion disk, or where matter orbits the BH at around 3 Schwarzchild radius, with a gradual spiraling in. But that's science river, something you are not interested in.
Which neither is happening . BH , focuses the magnetic field , to a " point " . Hence the area decreases and intensity of the magnetic field increases .
Bullshit....answer the question, justify your claim...link or reference will do. Common sense will tell you...Ooops sorry I forgot, OK, simply because it will attract opposite charge... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotating_black_hole "Note that astrophysical black holes are expected to have non-zero angular momentum, due to their formation via collapse of rotating stellar objects, but effectively zero charge, since any net charge will quickly attract the opposite charge and neutralize. For this reason the term "astrophysical" black hole is usually reserved for the Kerr black hole." OK river, that's it, no more trolling, um, sorry no more questions will be entered into, OK?Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Highlighted " Neutralize " . What " opposite charge ", can neutralize the magnetic field , physically ?
So do I, but I am staggered by your ignorance and want to help. Read the link I gave you and note the facts re electrical charge and magnetism. But as I said before river ol son, that's science, something you obviously ignore. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotating_black_hole Again river, in essence any charged BH is unlikely to exist, as it would attract opposite charged particles and neutralize. Any magnetic field is probably emanating from the accretion disk at 3 Schwarzchild radius, and/or from that matter as it spirals in and possibly flung around courtesy of the Lense Thirring effect near the BH EH, and then flung out at the polar jets we sometimes see with regards to some BH,s..... ps: I'll continue to refute, debunk and rubbish your nonsense if that's OK with you? Or on the other hand, I'll ignore your obvious trolling and any playing dumb, and repeated questions.
Not my counter anything river, just facts as they stand. But hey! what's new...I mean you reject all of mainstream science, particularly with regards to cosmology, and then resort to trolling when you are unable to refute observational evidence, particualrly of BH's, which you reject, and as usual, reject without any rhyme or reason or alternative, and instead just resort to trolling. That's why you are banned from the sciences river. That's the sad part with people like you and Fat Freddy.
if there is enough BH on the outside then it will be ripping things apart and twisting things like melting in both directions ? no data to show the universe will slow down then contract just speculation by some of the most brightests minds in theoretical physics, that it might do. i guess the outward direction of push does not logically define there is an opposite and equal reaction to pull back together the magnetic field would be stronger in some places weaker in others as stars form, does the magnetic field change ? in theory yes by creating more magnetic force ? im just thinking a loud
The BH is bounded by the EH, which is at the Schwarzchild limit, beyond which any collapsing matter, will continue to collapse. Outside of the EH of a Kerr spinning BH, [probably the most realistic kind] space is twisted in what is termed the Lense Thirring effect, [FRAME DRAGGING] and which was verified in the case of Earth's similar effect on spacetime in its vicinity by GP-B. https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/gpb/ That was the generally accepted scenario, until DE came along after some anomalous data surfaced. Magnetic fields in the vicinity of BH's is emanating from the accretion disk and spiraling inwards, and polar jets. BH Electric fields are quickly neautralized as per the article/s links I gave I have an article on magnetic fields in a BH's vicinity which I'll post in the sciences.
How does a black hole focus the magnetic field? Which magnetic field are you talking about? Which area are you talking about?
To your last statement Went to the site , interesting . But its not space that twists but the energy and matter In space that gets rotated . Their getting closer , but not quite there . The honey example is matter in space . Space its self does not change .
By shrinking the matter in the BH . Hence also the magnetic field . Galactic magnetic field . Area that the galactic magnetic field would cover , without a BH .
A shame you went to the site, yet still get it wrong. Firstly, its spacetime, not space...secondly, its frame dragging, more correctly known as the "Lense Thirring" effect, which has even been evidenced with spacetime twisting in Earth's vicinity, by GP-B. But hey, that's science, something you are ignorant of and not interested in. Again river, your nonsense has been totally answered and refuted. You can now once again, resort to trolling, which will be treated as such.
Energy and matter in space . In Earth's vicinity , GP-B shows . Twisting around . The fluidity . Hey that's science . Thanks for proving my thinking pad ; continue !!
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!I actually proved two things river, [1] your ignorance, and[2] your trolling: Evidence for those two facts are of course you being confined to the fringes and banned from the sciences.
