Conundrum

In your personal opinion, do you feel that the following implication is valid or invalid?

"I'm Not God I am God" I am God.

If I am immortal, then I will die sometime in the future

Thank you to vote before posting any comment.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Just step away from the crack pipe...

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

That's the only thing that is stopping me from destroying this planet.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

That would seem to be valid (but trivial) if we accept the principle of explosion, ex falso quodlibet. (From falsehood anything follows.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_explosion

That looks like a conditional, not an argument. So validity wouldn't seem to apply.

The conditional 'If p then q' would be T under the interpretation of p as F and q as T.

Truth functional logic can be counterintuitive.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

What the heck...if it will make you feel better...go ahead and destroy the planet.

 

Is this ""I'm Not God I am God" I am God." statement valid concerning you. Yes or No will do.

EDIT: I suppose we have to define God. So go with one you know most about.

 

You'd like that wouldn't you. I'm looking forward to meeting you.

 

Good. We're making progress.

 

Everyone dies and I believe in the afterlife, I like to meet people I don't like.

 

I'm flattered. Have you ever meet any people that you do like, just curious?