Is consciousness to be found in quantum processes in microtubules?

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by Write4U, Sep 8, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,069
    Are these action potentials self-referential? Microtubules are.
    I have given you a years worth of research material. If you don't read it, I cannot help you, without going back myself and rereading what prompted me to post what I already posted.
    This thread has 15 pages full of supporting, opposing, and practical scientific research links. Whatever you are asking me, I have already provided supporting evidence at the time I made the original post. If you have a specific question it may well be found in the link I provided.
    OK, what does the human body run on? Energy? How is energy distributed? What is wrong with the concept of microtubules? They are the processors in photosynthesis. Plants run on microtubules.........

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    If you didn't know that, you do now. If you did, you're cherry-picking.

    "Dividing without centrioles: innovative plant microtubule organizing centres organize mitotic spindles in bryophytes, the earliest extant lineages of land plants".

    Background and aims
    and
    Introduction [quote]Plant microtubules underlie all phases of plant development, such as determination of the division plane, cell shaping and wall deposition, in addition to mitosis/meiosis and cytokinesis.[/quote]

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3240993/
     
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2019
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,069
    @ Bells
    click
     
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2019
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,451
    Energy is distributed by ATP.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,451
    Haven’t you already done this?
     
  8. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,451
    It also runs on water, glucose, haemoglobin and a hundred other things.
     
  9. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,270
    Nothing at all.

    On the contrary, studies in microtubules is vital for cancer researchers. And the reason for that is simple:

    Emerging evidence suggests that tubulins and microtubule-associated proteins may play a role in a range of cellular stress responses, thus conferring survival advantage to cancer cells.

    The ability to destabilise and inhibit microtubules is quite important in cancer treatments.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4061531/
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3946048/
    https://dmm.biologists.org/content/3/5-6/304
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-30158-6
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discovery_and_development_of_tubulin_inhibitors
     
    Write4U likes this.
  10. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,069
    And that precludes the use of microtubules?
     
  11. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,069
    Consider it an expression of frustration.
     
  12. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,069
    Yes, those are the chemical information, the fuel on which the organisms run, microtubules (neurons) are the processors.
     
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2019
  13. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,069
    Thank you Bells, for that encouraging answer and the links. These are the contributions I had hoped for....

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  14. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,069
    Yes, when a run-away mitosis occurs, it is good to be able to inhibit the microtubules that are responsible.

    AFAIK, Hameroff suggests that the same principle holds for Alzheimer disease, except instead of "inhibiting", the goal is "stabilizing " and "rebuilding"
     
  15. Yazata Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,902
    They are? Can you defend that statement because frankly, I don't believe it.

    Most of your links have nothing to do with your thesis. Yes, we know that microtubules exist. Yes, we know that they play important roles in many eukaryotic cells. Yes we know that slime molds and Fibonnacci sequences can be pretty. But how does any of that support the thesis that microtubules are little minds and the seat of consciousness? (Sometimes your posts seem to be little more than stream-of-consciousness.)

    Exchemist has already addressed adenosine triphosphate. While there is more than one way that energy is distributed, ATP is by far the major one.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adenosine_triphosphate

    Nothing. As long as we don't rush off of on flights of fancy and start attributing hugely complex functions to them that they almost certainly don't have. They aren't likely to be the secret of mind or of all of biology.

    There you go again... I don't believe that and think that it's almost certainly untrue.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chloroplast#Structure

    What has that got to do with mind and consciousness? You seem to be off one one of your stream of consciousness tangents again. Yes, microtubules are interesting and important, but don't push it farther than it can reasonably go.

    I fully and enthusiastically agree that cell biology is fascinating. But the best way to study it isn't to fixate on one obsessive and probably rather unlikely idea and then look for anything that seems cool that seems to you to have some vague relationship to that central idea.

    Study cell biology the normal way. That doesn't require that you attend a university or take university classes. Here's a free creative-commons online cell biology text that I've downloaded for myself and you might like too. (It's a pretty advanced book that's intended for university biology majors. But you should be able to handle it.):

    https://dc.uwm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=biosci_facbooks_bergtrom

    Hopefully you will find other ideas in there that excite you and you want to talk about.
     
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2019
    James R likes this.
  16. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,069
    I think you'll find that ATP has deep connection with microtubules.
    https://digitalworks.union.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1933&context=theses
     
  17. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,069
    According to Hameroff, the two tubulins that make up a microtubules allow for electro-chemical action in opposite directions. This is a self referential function, no?

    Hameroff proposes that this function creates a superposition and is the reason for the concept of qu-bits.
    This is the main item of contention being debated in neural science.

    Note the polarities

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    https://mappingignorance.org/2015/06/17/on-the-quantum-theory-of-consciousness/
    IMO, the presence of microtubules in the cytoskeleton allows for the "experience" of pain throughout the body. The presence of microtubules in the cerebral cortex allows for the "experience" of thought.

    Is it possible that the presence of microtubules allows for all sensory "experiences"?
    That is not my thesis at all. Nor do I believe that is Hameroff or Penrose's thesis. No one claims that microtubules are little minds! They are little processing machines.....difference!

    No one claims that neurons are little minds!


    AFAIK, microtubules act as processors, but with electro-chemical sensitivity, which according to Penrose may result in a "threshold event", a sensory experience.

    The combined function of billions of microtubules allow for the emergence of sensory experiences, such as warmth, cold, pain, itching, smell, taste, sight, hearing, etc.

    Does the human body or mind offer any other "processor" that might offer a different path?
    The conscious and unconscious brain functions are all a result of microtubular action.

    Ask Hameroff (anesthesiologist), he can selectively render the microtubules that generate consciousness and sensations, unconscious, but leave the microtubules that subconsciously control internal body functions unaffected, so they can continue to perform the interoceptive maintenance chores while the "mind" is "unconscious".
     
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2019
  18. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,069
    You're missing the point. Slime molds and single celled organisms contain microtubules which control all their functions. Microtubules are present in the earliest biological organisms. Why is that and what does that imply?

    IMO, the amazing fact is that ALL eukaryotic organisms contain microtubules. They are a "common denominator" in all modern organisms, but already exist in simpler form in Prokaryotic organisms. This simplicity is considered a benefit as it allows us to study microtubules more efficiently. It allows us a peek into the past and observe the evolution and sophistication of later versions of microtubules. Its like analysing old model computers.
     
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2019
  19. Yazata Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,902
    To JamesR and Bells: Why isn't this thread in 'Alternative Theories'?

    I'd like to ask that it be moved.
    Not silenced, not closed, just moved to a more appropriate forum.

    It definitely isn't cell biology as that science is conventionally understood. But I'm not 100% convinced that it's 'pseudoscience' either, though I'm increasingly leaning towards that view. (Just too much grandiosity, too many speculations being presented as if they were established biology, and way too many explanatory gaps.)

    I'm reminded of the kind of people who appear insisting that they can prove that Einstein is wrong with arguments that often don't make much sense. In my opinion, this is the biological version of that.
     
    exchemist likes this.
  20. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,270
    I agree.
     
  21. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,270
    Firstly, a neuron is not a microtutubles. The manner in which you put (neurons) in brackets infers that they are the same thing.

    Secondly, there is absolutely no evidence that microtubules are "the processors".

    The manner in which you worded that sentence is deliberately deceptive.

    It's not 'run-away mitosis'.

    The biggest issue with tubular inhibitors is the side effects.

    Okay..

    No one knows what causes Alzheimer's. No one knows if the molecular and cellular changes in the brain is the cause of Alzheimer's or caused by Alzheimer's.

    There are various things that affect and are affected by Alzheimer's. Two things that affect or are connected to microtubules - which lead to the death of neurons:

    Amyloid Plaques
    The beta-amyloid protein involved in Alzheimer’s comes in several different molecular forms that collect between neurons. It is formed from the breakdown of a larger protein, called amyloid precursor protein. One form, beta-amyloid 42, is thought to be especially toxic. In the Alzheimer’s brain, abnormal levels of this naturally occurring protein clump together to form plaques that collect between neurons and disrupt cell function. Research is ongoing to better understand how, and at what stage of the disease, the various forms of beta-amyloid influence Alzheimer’s.

    Neurofibrillary Tangles
    Neurofibrillary tangles are abnormal accumulations of a protein called tau that collect inside neurons. Healthy neurons, in part, are supported internally by structures called microtubules, which help guide nutrients and molecules from the cell body to the axon and dendrites. In healthy neurons, tau normally binds to and stabilizes microtubules. In Alzheimer’s disease, however, abnormal chemical changes cause tau to detach from microtubules and stick to other tau molecules, forming threads that eventually join to form tangles inside neurons. These tangles block the neuron’s transport system, which harms the synaptic communication between neurons.

    Emerging evidence suggests that Alzheimer’s-related brain changes may result from a complex interplay among abnormal tau and beta-amyloid proteins and several other factors. It appears that abnormal tau accumulates in specific brain regions involved in memory. Beta-amyloid clumps into plaques between neurons. As the level of beta-amyloid reaches a tipping point, there is a rapid spread of tau throughout the brain.


    Further reading when it comes to Alzheimer's:

    https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324230.php

    Unfortunately, treatments that target this, or as you have attempted to argue Hameroff's position of strengthening the microtubules, have not been successful.

    However, at least one interesting discovery has been made and it has nothing to do with microtubules, and everything to do with gum disease:

    https://www.newscientist.com/articl...ow-what-causes-alzheimers-and-how-to-stop-it/

    I should have moved this to pseudoscience..
     
  22. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,069
    And why are you telling me this? This is the specialty of Stuart Hameroff.
    You may have missed this but it was presented in Post #1 in this thread.
    Watch the videos and links I have provided. I think it is most unfair to ignore the wealth of information I provide and then come to me with profound observations which I presented in the very first post of this thread.

    Note the Neurofibrillary Tangles (blue)

    click
     
    Last edited: Oct 27, 2019
  23. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,069
    Sigh....., this was addressed by Hameroff in Post # 1 of this thread. See above @ 6.20

    or see below

     
    Last edited: Oct 27, 2019
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page