why we need ghosts

Yeah..it's evident you never watch them. Never are any such disclaimers presented with these paranormal reality shows.

They never comment anything about that because in the history of TV never has that comment ever been aired with any program.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

They certainly have you fooled, so it looks like their strategy works.

Ghost Hunters added a computer generated shadow to "prove" they had found a ghost. Careful replays show that the segment that showed that a two second segment was duplicated to make up airtime. The first time it did not have the shadow, the second time it did.

In Haunted Collector, an "expert" finds items that are "haunted" (usually valuable antiques) and offers to "remove" them to "lift the curse." Needless to say he has quite an incentive to prove that they are "haunted" - and makes a good penny selling them later.

In Ghost Mine, a "paranormal expert" (Kristin Luman) claims she is a psychologist. She does not have a degree. In another video she claims she is an "accredited hypnotherapist" who studied at Portland University. Portland University does not have such a program either. She does have one paranormal connection - she was an actress in "Harvest of Fear," a teen slasher flick that has something vaguely to do with a curse. Which is actually an excellent background to have if you want to act scared of imaginary ghosts.

In Ghost Asylum, amateur ghostbusters build "ghost traps" to try to trap ghosts. These include solar cells attached to capacitors to keep them from manifesting. In their own words - "By using a solar panel, we could reverse this by sucking the spirit’s energy back into a battery." They even build - I kid you not - a "ghost trapper" built out of a wet-dry vacuum lined with aluminum foil.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Skeptics will lie about anything. Is that all you found?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

https://www.csicop.org/si/show/none_of_this_is_true

Council for Media Integrity has suggested that certain paranormal programming should carry “entertainment” or “fiction” labels. Likewise, the British media regulatory body Ofcom notes that any demonstrations of paranormal phenomena “… that purport to be real (as opposed to entertainment) must be treated with due objectivity” and that if a demonstration is for entertainment purposes, “this must be made clear to viewers.”

Ummmm I guess this is a ghost written article

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Wow..a quote from a skeptic website about what they prefer should be the case but isn't. Yeah..that proves everything.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Sounds like you didn't follow the link

A further extract from the same link shows

Program creators and broadcasters usually attempt to comply with such guidelines by presenting onscreen “disclaimers,” essentially informing viewers that such shows may not be exactly as they appear and thus should only be taken seriously by the hard of thinking. However, such messages are often shown for a very short period of time and tend to contain long and rather tortuously worded messages displayed in a relatively small font. Although such disclaimers may satisfy legal and regulatory guidelines, we wondered whether they had any real psychological impact on viewers. ................

(A study on the effectiveness of disclaimers goes here (basically none)

Ending with.............)

Next time you see a paranormal program briefly presenting one of those long “for entertainment only” disclaimers you might be tempted to think, “Oh well, I guess it’s better than nothing.” Our research suggests that you are wrong.

https://www.csicop.org/si/show/none_of_this_is_true

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

That's a complete lie. Never are any disclaimers presented with any paranormal program. I've watched hundreds of these shows. They're never presented at all. Like I said, skeptics will lie about anything.

 

That would be the No True Scotsman fallacy - i.e. if there is a disclaimer it isn't a real paranormal program.

 

Do you actually believe that?

 

Usually..

 

OK.

Do you think I've lied to you?

 

I don't know. I lose track..

 

Well, I didn't.

 

If we are going to just freely toss the word around, with no mind of arguing in good faith, then I am free to say that:
Magical Realist is "lying" about having watched GhostHunters.
Magical Realist is 'lying" about having analyzed any of the videos he's posted.
Magical Realist is "lying" about having read or studied ghost accounts at all.

See, MR, once you drop below the threshold of arguing in good faith, the discussion breaks down completely.

We have zero reason to take anything you say as anything other than lies.

 

1) That's not true. "All content on this website, including but not limited to videos, audio, live streams, articles, copy, images (hereafter referred to as ‘content’), are for entertainment purposes only." (from VeryParanormal)

2) The reason that most programs do NOT have disclaimers is that it is easier to get money out of people like you without disclaimers. Follow the money.

 

That's not a paranormal TV show. It's a website.

 

I don't care what you think of me. That's why only post the evidence. I don't expect anyone to take my word for it.

 

This is a lie.

This is a lie.

Magical Realist will tell any lie to make a point.

See how easy that is? I have refuted everything you say, in the present, in the past and in the future.

 

It hosts paranormal TV shows.

On the other hand, I am sure there are plenty of other websites that serve the more gullible believers.

 

Then don't talk to me. See..that was easy too.