My Cosmology

I thought a singularity was a point where in effect the maths breaks down and if so that says to me that we are entering an area of no understanding.
What do you think?

That is because I have not conveyed the way I see it.

Nothing does not exist.
It is an unobserved mythical contruction...tell me where you can find nothing...

Thanks for all the links.

I understand this stuff better than I express.

And in truth I am not happy with the big bang ... two aspects ... the idea (cosmic egg and catholic church determination to embrace what is effectively a pagon idea) came before observation...and the big bang was toast until inflation was put forward and as far as I know inflation is not supported by observation ...further I cant accept everything went from very small to the observable universe in no more than a trillionth of a second...and I dont care what math supports that idea I simply do not consider it possible or remotely likely...its big real big and to suggest the doubling doubling etc to me is unacceptable...now folk can call me what they like but that is my unsupported opinion....think it thru...look out there and imagine what is beyond and see if it does not feel quiet right.

Heck sounds too much like god to me☺

Anyways I am out there now imaging and thinking thinking thinking...so I am a very dangerous man☺

Alex

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

What is a wave.
Is it a physical thing or the way we convert its qualities into a math expression?
Is it particles jiggling about and or wave is how we view it...
The clouds rolled in just as I got everything working...two hours setting up adjusting etc etc all for nothing...its s cruel game.

But just to be clear. BB is our current best scientific model but it may not be the last.
We have only been at it for 100 years and I doubt if we have it all worked out yet.

We are doing well indeed but it would be somewhat arrrogant not to think there is yet more to understand.

By the way...how do you "feel" about the theory of inflation...do you think it is reasonable to think everything could grow from zip to all there is in a small fraction of a second.
Alex

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

In this case the CMB (cosmic microwave background)

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

(Maps of the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR), showing the improved resolution which has been achieved with better microwave radio telescopes)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background

I find it remarkable that in spite of the wavelength increase over time, the CMB is still in the microwave range, even as longer wavelengths are able to travel much farther than microwaves, and their absence would indicate an original small size emitter (the BB singularity?).

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

As I understand it the inflationary epoch experienced a metric expansion of spacetime geometry which is not restricted by SOL and allows for FTL expansion (the balloon metaphor), and does support the notion of a universe which answers to mathematical laws, i.e exponential growth.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflationary_epoch

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expansion_of_the_universe

This stuff is so awesome.....

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

And while mainstream theory does not allow for a geo
metric space outside of the universe, it does not falsify a "permittive condition" which allowed for a FTL metric expansion of spacetime.

And, IMO, a metaphysical "permittive condition" can certainly be infinite in scope.

 

I was seeking your view on what a wave in general may be.

You have done a wonderful job here in putting togther very good and informative links and I for one thank you.
I think for not only myself but for casual readers they are most helpful.

You like this idea I can tell but isnt all you describe only a nonexistent "nothing"?☺

Yes I absolutely agree.

I hope to post my result from last night and an ealier effort from a couple of nights ago so keep an eye out.

Re Inflationary Epoc.
I sought your comment upon how you felt about things happening so fast and although your contributions on the matter are both interesting and helpful you did not say if you thought it sounded reasonable or not.

Alex

 

No , not at all circular .

 

You'd have to explain how it's not circular, since, as described, it is.

 

Quasars give energy to the Cosmic Web to be seen .

Heat slows down the extreme cold energy flow

Quasars in of themselves is high focused Cosmic Plasmic Energy , from the cosmic web .

 

Quasars give energy to the Cosmic Web to be seen .

Heat slows down the extreme cold energy flow

Quasars in of themselves is high focusedCosmic PlasmicEnergy , from the cosmic web .

It is the consequence of extremely high energy

 

Without Quasar energy ( focused Cosmic Web cold superfluid ) the Cosmic Web would not be revealed

 

So where is the big spider?

Alex

 

Life is everywhere

 

River, there is no such thing as cold energy, and cold doesn't flow.

You are making stuff up. Why?

 

Cold energy is about resistance , the lack of resistance .

 

... is a contradiction in terms.

Why are you making stuff up?

 

Cold energy is about resistance , the lack of resistance .

 

... an oxymoron.

 

Cold energy is about resistance , the lack of resistance .( from my post # 117 )

 

As Spike Milligan said," Hey, who turned on the dark?".