Why is the water molecule an allergen?

Discussion in 'Human Science' started by Jimmy-rigger, Sep 30, 2018.

  1. Jimmy-rigger Registered Member

    Messages:
    28
    Hi Sci Forums

    I recently come across some interesting articles and I'd like to know your thoughts on them;

    https://socialnewsdaily.com/75296/woman-possesses-fatal-water-allergy/

    An article about her 20+ years prior - https://www.thefreelibrary.com/JUST+ONE+CUP+OF+WATER+COULD+KILL+LITTLE+HEIDI%3B+Girl's+deadly+allergy...-a061152595



    Of importance is the fact that she cannot drink a mouthful of water - or her throat swells shut and she falls unconscious (shock).



    She has to carry epi pens on her at all times because her internal reaction to water is potentially fatal, like someone with a severe peanut allergy.

    Scientists currently can't explain why the water molecule can trigger an immune response, since the consensus among scientists is that a molecule even smaller than oxygen cannot cause an immune response.



    Recently (last week) in the news, there was a separate case of a girl being allergic to the water molecule. She too also cannot drink water, because when she does, she gets ''agonizing sores'' in her mouth, so she only drinks milk.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/...llergic-TEARS-breaks-hives-touches-water.html
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,644
    You again?

    Give it up.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Jimmy-rigger Registered Member

    Messages:
    28
    I'm sorry ?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,644
    Oddball
    Gaiagirl
    Frank Baker
    Leo Corvidae

    And now

    Jimmy-rigger

    All asking the same questions, over and over.
     
  8. Jimmy-rigger Registered Member

    Messages:
    28

    lol youre weird, this is my only account.
     
  9. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,521
  10. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,959
    You would do well to stick to only credible sources of information.

    The condition is Aquagenic Urticaria.

    She has a dermal reaction to water. The claims about not being able to take even a mouthful of water are very likely to be highly exaggerated.

    There is no point in debating the various hyperbolic claims made by disreputable sources.
     
  11. Jimmy-rigger Registered Member

    Messages:
    28
  12. Jimmy-rigger Registered Member

    Messages:
    28
    ok finally a normal response lol dunno why ppl are so angry on here today, but i found a ncbi article that says the patient has an internal reaction to water https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5438944/
     
  13. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,521
    Bye, Gaiagirl.
     
  14. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,959
    Can you point me at the place where it actually says internal reaction? Aquagenic Urticaria is a skin condition.
     
  15. Jimmy-rigger Registered Member

    Messages:
    28

    Sure

    ''He also complained of pruritic erythematous changes, with swelling of the lips and oral cavity, after drinking water. Each episode lasted from 30 to 60 minutes and resolved spontaneously. ''
     
  16. Jimmy-rigger Registered Member

    Messages:
    28
    bye guy who keeps spamming my thread lol *blocked*
     
    RainbowSingularity likes this.
  17. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,959
    That's a bit of a reach to 'throat closing up and falling unconscious from shock' and 'potentially fatal, like someone with a severe peanut allergy'.

    I refer to stick to facts, and leave hyperbole for the rag papers.

    I've yet to find a medical report that backs up Falconer's bolder claims.
     
  18. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,057
    "Oral cavity" isn't really "internal".
     
  19. Jimmy-rigger Registered Member

    Messages:
    28
    i thought it referred to the mouth and throat? which is internal iirc
     
  20. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,057
    It's exposed to the external environment much like the skin. The question would be how far do the effects actually go "in"?
     
  21. Jimmy-rigger Registered Member

    Messages:
    28
    wouldnt that fact mean saliva isn't mostly water? since then their throats should be constantly swollen shut.
     
  22. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    i keep asking the question, is water only water ?
    it probably always has trace elements and residual charges in it.
    the tongue can pick up electrical signals in tiny amounts in the taste bud area.
    if one of the taste receptors is linked to a poison respon or crossed over with an allergic response which is pre programmed like an autonomic response then maybe the conductivity is the issue and not the water its self.(note milk is a very different PH level to water and different electrical conductvity and fat cells which would saturate and block various receptors etc)
    maybe trace elements like chlorine etc also trigger the response in an electrical frequency range.

    they could probably tests her under anesthesia by anesthetising the tongue in the OR and then applying water and residual small electrical shocks to observe the autonomic responses.
    having a ventilator and team standing by would make it pretty safe.
    the benefit to science may outweight the cost too.(as im sure it would cost many thousands of dollars which no one wants to pay).

    considering the body is made up of mostly water, what it also has is all that water never sits as only water, it is always bonded to something else.
    (im just postulating)
    considering the tongue can measure elctrical density, maybe thats worth a look.

    it probably isnt
    are poison responses & autonomic responses triggered by taste alone ?(yes i think)
     
    Last edited: Oct 1, 2018
    joepistole likes this.
  23. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,521
    Interesting reply.

    How, I wonder, can I "keep spamming" this posters threads [plural], seeing as this "account" has only 2 threads on the forum, this person has, allegedly, only one account, as asserted in post 5, and I have only responded twice in all, on one of them? Strange.
     
    Last edited: Oct 1, 2018
    sideshowbob and joepistole like this.

Share This Page