We never went to the moon.

Is there any conspiracy theory you do NOT believe?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Who destroyed yours?
Alex

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

When Fat Freddy come scene the scene we can talk about nuts, nuts, nuts, brazil nuts, hazel nuts, walnuts, nuts, nuts, nuts!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Seems pretty dishonest, but I guess we should give you some slack since you're crazy.

 

Most likely, but what if he's divinely inspired?

Doesn't that give the crazies an absolution?

 

FF, snce you're here, and I don't feel like visting 200 old posts, what is the current stance of the Moon Hoax from your PoV?

There was once a time that some people thought we didn't go at all, but moderates have backed off that.

I don't need the whole kit & kaboodle of evidence, just the bottom line.

Did we send spaceships of any sort to lunar orbit?
Were any manned?
Did we land any craft on the Moon?
Were any manned?

 

http://jazzfanz.com/showthread.php?...8d4d23f7e547&p=1247615&viewfull=1#post1247615
http://www.giraffeboards.com/showpost.php?s=040fa125d84e5bea6c6526a46905973b&p=1284061&postcount=141
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144487&page=164&p=8637956&viewfull=1#post8637956

Busy, I'm sure there's more. I struggle to find the words at how anyone can be so mad as to do this sort of stuff, but this is a drop in the ocean compared to his history.

 

I can understand the doubt but considering this was Nasa first crowning achievement if the moon landing was in fact "A Lie" it makes you wonder about everything else they discovered in space. I mean since we don't all go to space we have to take their word for it. It does not mean they are lying for not letting us but not everyone would be capable of going. Like is there really anything outside of the earth? What if its just a big hologram and there nothing outside earth at all.

 

It certainly would.

If someone has a world view in which events of worldwide historical fact are doubted, and doubted based only on their rejection of science and history, then they would be wondering about all sorts of things. Did WWII happen? Were TVs really invented? Do cellphones actually work? Are we really just a hologram in a big computer?

This one wonders how those people could function at all.

But, since it wasn't a lie, we're all saved.

 

What if everything is just big hologram and there is nothing outside of you. Imagine if nothing around you is real that even the chair you sit on and the floor you stand on is not real but just holographic projections. In fact no one around you are real and everything you think you see touch or experience in no more than a projection.
Imagine there are not even holographic projections that all there is and nothing more is your conscienceness and all you think is real is no more than an illusion.
You can imagine all that but if you do go and seek imaginary professional help.
So if there is nothing besides the Earth what is that big glowing ball in the sky... go outside its up there and read more than one book to work out cosmology.
Alex

 

There is footage of zero-G that lasts longer than thiry seconds. As far as I know, it's possible to fake zero-G in a diving plane for about thirty seconds and there's no other way to fake zero-G. Therefore, I'd say the space station is real and it's manned.

The Surveyor program may have been real but I'm not in a position to be sure.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveyor_program

I doubt that any vehicles that went beyond three hundred miles up were manned because of this alternative info on space radiation that I've read.
http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1147.0

Yes. See above.

I'm not in a position to be sure about anything but I'd bet that lots of the unmanned mission such as Voyager were real as they can probably build unmanned craft that can withstand radiation that would kill humans.

See above. According to the alternative info, humans going more than about three hundred miles above the earth would need two meters of lead to protect them from space radiation both in and beyond the Van Allen belts.


I can't be one hundred percent sure about anything I read about space radiation as it's all second-hand info. The anomalies in the photos and footage* prove that what the government showed us was done in a studio on earth. There are several plausible scenarios that would explain why. The scenario of space radiation being much stronger than we're being told is just one of the plausible scenarios; I think it's the most likely one.


*
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144487

 

Hm. As mentioned, I'm not looking for the arguments, merely the status.
It sounds like the particular flavour of hoax you're favoring is the "Van Allen radiation belt" version. i.e. that radiation beyond the VA belt is unsurvivable, thus, we go to LEO but not to the Moon.

I'm curious why, on one hand, you are willing toss out the vast preponderance of evidence of entire space program as false, yet the evidence about VA radiation is apparently unquestioned. What if the radiation claim is just ... wrong?

 

Then another of the plausible scenarios for their having had to fake it is the reason they faked it. The anomalies have proven the hoax so the radiation issue isn't about whether they faked it. It's about why they faked it.

The only people who can be sure of what the true nature and levels of space radiation are are people with high security clearances. All we know is what the government makes public which may or may not be bogus. I'd bet it was bogus. We can only speculate on why they had to fake it but we know they faked it. I just think that space radiation is the most likely reason as they probably had the technology to send manned craft to the moon that didn't have two meters of lead to protect the astronauts. The image of space that they've given us is one of space that could be traveled in without that shielding.

Before I'd seen the anomalies that prove the hoax, I used to think that they probably really went. I figured that if they could build submarines with life-support systems that could cross the arctic under the ice, they could build a space craft with a similar life support system. Lethal space radiation explains everything.

 

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Except your willful ignorance.

 

I've seen a mountain of proof that the footage was faked in a studio* and I've seen zero proof that it was real. Post something you consider to be proof that they really went and we can talk about whether it's really proof.


*
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144487

 

No. The burden of proof is on you as the one making the extraordinary claims.

Besides, 'talking' with you is boring as hell.

 

Ok. Here's the proof.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144487


Case closed.