Last life period of the common ancestor for apes

Museums may have been the temples in which I was fulfilled with awe and wonder and an appreciation of the vagueries of our understanding of our past present and potential future. Cathedrals that nourished my soul. Epiphanies abounded.
As soon as I could drive, I started ditching school to go and hang out in Chicago's museums and art institute.
One fine day, I came bebopping around a corner and walked right into the chest of one of my teachers-------oops----busted.
He said: "You're not in the group?"
me: "group?"
him: "Get outa here" (meaning: I'm gonna pretend that I haven't seen you.)
...............nice guy, had a good attitude for a teacher.........Talked with me about it the next day.

..........................
years later, while studying at the university in chicago;
I found myself standing in front of the neanderthal tableau lecturing about the errors incorporated within the exhibit. (it turns out that i was not nearly radical enough in my condemnation)------------------science, it seems, progresses through a series of shrinking concentric errors while seeking the mark of knowledge.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

One wonders just how much (or which?) DNA change predicates noticeable morphological change.

Years ago, I read about some seemingly wild claims about dna change in mice in the Chernobyl fallout zone with no apparent morphological change.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Except I didn/t say any absolute certainty applies...I just infer the closer to t=0, the less certainty.
The closer to t+10-43 seconds, the less absolute certainty applies, conversely, the further we move from that first Planck instant, the more confident cosmologists are.
In essence this is just dmoe doing what he does best.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

As I commented on earlier, all our friend is interested in doing is causing supposedly "shock and awe" without any basis, evidence, or knowledge.
This is the definition of a troll.

 

No, the Big Bang is a model of universe expansion that fits observation, creationism is the idea that a wizard did it.

 

We already have the technology to prevent runaway global warming, it's called not burning fossil fuels at all, and it works perfectly.

 

sorry, paddoboy, my mistake...

You made it quite clear that you did not say "any absolute certainty applies"...then you went on to repeat (in bolded letters), that "The closer to t+10-43 seconds, the less absolute certainty applies, conversely, the further we move from that first Planck instant, the more confident cosmologists are."


At least you read what I linked and was nice enough to Post another Ad Hominem...thank you kindly...

P.S. I would give you a "LIKE" but I have been informed that to do so might incur another "BAN"...so...