Gravity

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Oh wake up my friend...You did the song and dance, and lied and acted the goose to boot, as everyone has noted.....Perhaps again it's your lack of complete understanding of the English language.
Let me again say, that gravity besides being a great benefit, is also a hindrance when we need to send craft aloft, into orbit, beyond orbit, and even beyond the solar system.
I never spoke of gravity assist, for the same reason I never spoke of the ISS :shrug:
The post in question, is 100% correct.

If you do not want to make the silly errors you are making so often, then at least take the time to read a post properly, and try and do that without any angst, urge for revenge or any other agenda.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Pl read my post clearly, I gave you the benefit of 'launch aspect'.....in your post you covered only the resistance (your Hindrance) provided by the Gravity during that phase, I just broached 'Gravity assist' and delegated the job to you to provide details, you know all those links etc where you really excel.

and you know I never make any mistake, I give full liberty and benefit of doubt to you, only when I am fully convinced that you are babbling, I highlight. But unfortunately for you, whenever you try to offer your opinion, you babble.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

You do not delegate anything to me my friend...You as a lay person with no credentials and an amateur [ backed by online evidence]who seems to have no idea about what he is talking about, would have trouble delegating anything to even a child.

If you chose to drown yourself in your total stupid delusions, be my guest

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

. We have had a few nuts over the years make the same delusional claims.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

And please note carefully my friend, that I did also give you the opportunity of elaborating on gravity assists [or gravity slingshots as it is sometimes called]
I even offered to give an honest appraisal and peer review on your take on it,

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

and I'm sure others would have helped you also.
But that was not forthcoming......hence my rundown on the effect at post 36 among a summary of gravity in general, which I did as a sort of basic tutorial for the initiator of the OP, and as a return to normality after your childish tirade.

 

So please answer post #25.

 

Sure!

NB:
I purposely left out all posts referring to rajesh, to simplify things.

 

Sweetpea has deleted that post on this thread..

 

Got it. So just another unsupported claim then...

 

Actually he pointed out a silly math error which I fully acknowledged. You on the other hand never admit your errors, which again is just like rajesh, yet another coincidence!

 

Pl link any error which you pointed out and I have not admitted......otherwise retract this statement.

 

Here are 2 errors that were pointed out to you that you did not admit.
The direction is hidden in the formula, once we talk of relative velocity, the direction is there.
It is very legitimate to describe the motion (Say, Velocity Vector) of two frames in third frame, in that case direction is crucial to ascertain the relative speed.
I did not point out these errors, but then that was not my claim.

I am finished with you, I would hate to distract you from your trolling of Paddoboy.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

What is illegitimate in describing the motion of two frames (two clocks) in third frame ? And how will you calculate the relative speed if direction vector is not specified ?

If you find these statements erroneous, then it shows that you are not conversant with the relative speed based physics, you need to go through the paper I linked in that thread. That paper would help you.

Since this forum does not seem to have any proper mechanism to handle people who run away after making false accusations, so you can run away (to other threads).

 

I rest my case.

 

I called Thomas g... tom
I don't know paddo's real name...is it paddo?
Your ill, get some help you liar. Your not worth it you doughnut.

 

1. You barge in with accusation.
2. When questioned you dig some old thread and bring out 2 statements of mine, absolutely unconnected with you. declaring these statements as false.
3. When asked, how these statements are wrong, then you run away.

Thats your script, man. Throw stone and run away. I have reported your false accusation, let me see how moderators handle people like you, who run away after hurling false accusations.


Mods,

1. I need to know what is forum policy with respect to false accusations.
2. I need to know what is forum policy with respect to posters who declare something erroneous, without substantiating, and then run away.

 

Since your saying I used paddo's real name...What would that be then? what did you read on that deleted post?
Don't bother answering those questions... your going on ignore you liar.

 

You are Paddoboy or his pliant plant. You do not deserve any further response. You can use as much abusive words as they are there in your repertoir.

 

Paddo, how does the god know your real name?
I have her/him on ignore now.
Sorry, that should be Mr Paddo since we have not been introduced.

 

Mr Inerrant God, "repertoire" is spelled with an e at the end.

Just saying...................

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

If you have a question about the forum policy you should PM the mods, that way they won't miss the question. Barring that you could always just read the forum rules yourself.