THE PHILOCHRON LOGIC The Philochron Logic is the symbolic description of time. The logical connectives are: Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! The basic propositions of the Philochron Logic are: B ∧ D --> T, If there is becoming and duration then there is time. (Si hay devenir y duración entonces hay tiempo.) T --> B ∧ D, Time implies (contains) the becoming and duration. (El tiempo implica (contiene) el devenir y la duración.) Elvis Sibilia
just wondered. If there is duration then there is time there is no need for becoming (whatever the hell that is suppose to mean).
In other threads I have said that becoming is the inherent property of matter and bodies to experience sequential changes. Duration is the permanence of things in reality.
http://humanistic-behaviorism.blogspot.com/2015/06/the-theory-of-becoming-time-duality.html from the blog: "THE HUMANISTIC BEHAVIORISM AND THE PHILOCHRONY" "This new vision of psychology tries to reconcile behaviorism with humanism through general principles of behavior." You've posted this in what appears to be the right place at last. So, this thread and the many others you have started here is an adjunct to your blog activities? The OP appears to be just a restatement of the blog. Are you promoting philochrony or did was there something you wished to discuss about it? Can you explain your interest in philochrony in terms of philochrony? What do you feel has changed with time to make this topic of particular interest to you and to the world in the 21st century? How did behaviorism let you down that you felt that it needed reconciliation with humanism, and has philochrony accomplished this goal, or is it a work in progress? Or to put it another way, is philochrony at a level that you feel is 'self-actualized'? (ready to move on to the next level of awareness, as opposed to a more basic need)
Hola Danshawen The Philochrony (Filocronia) is the natural science that describes the relation among becoming, duration and time. Time is studied for Physics, Philosophy and Psychology. That is why the Philochrony relates these three sciences. Buenas tardes
SYMBOLOGY OF THE PHILOCHRON LOGIC < It happened today 2 < It happened this year 3 < It happened a decade ago 4 < It happened a century ago 5 < It happened in the Christian era 6 < It happened before the Christian era + It happens now > It will happen little probably 2 > It will happen probably 3 > It will happen very probably = Simultaneous X Sequential, in sequence Sibilia
https://philosophynow.org/issues/48/Henri_Bergson_and_the_Perception_of_Time This is… actually not bad. Thanks, Sibilia.
Examples of propositions 1 (P ∧ Q) + --> (P ∧ Q) = . If P and Q happen now then they are simultaneous. Q< ∧ R2< . Q happened today and R happened this year. (P ∧ Q) < X . P and Q happened today, in sequence. Q4< --> Q5< . If Q happened one century ago, then Q happened in the Christian era. S5< V S6< . S happened in the Christian era or S happened before the Christian era.
That is only true in your reference frame. In any other reference frame events P and Q will not be simultaneous.
P ∧ Q) + --> (P ∧ Q) = V (P ∧ Q) X . If P and Q happen now then they are simultaneous or sequential (Relativity).
Yes, yes. I see now. Reality has always been aglow with travellers whose chakras are baptized in life-force. Humankind has nothing to lose. We are in the midst of a cosmic refining of coherence that will tap into the galaxy itself.
