The Law of the astral inertia

Discussion in 'Alternative Theories' started by Asexperia, Jul 25, 2015.

Page 2 of 3
  1. James R

    James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,421
    Gravitons don't have charge, either.
    What is it? A force? A field? What?
    So you're saying that objects that are attached to the Earth in some way rotate with the Earth. Is that right? That's fairly uncontroversial.
    Ok. That's standard science, too.

    Yes, but please explain how the orbit was made elliptical by the astral inertia.

    Why elliptical, by the way? Why not square or circular or egg-shaped?
    It sounds like your astral inertia theory is the same as Newton's law of gravity. Is there anything different about it?
     
    James R, Jul 27, 2015
    #21
    quantum_wave likes this.

  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Asexperia

    Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,725
    i said: The astral inertia is determined by the mass.
    Correction: The astral inertia is determined by the momentum or quantity of movement.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    Sent by James R:
    Gravitons don't have charge, either.

    OK. But, they don't exist.

    What is it? A force? A field? What?

    I told it. Gravity is a fictitious force.

    How did the Earth's orbit "convert" to elliptical?

    When It was caught by the Sun's inertia.

    PS: Three questions are pending. I need more time.
     
    Asexperia, Jul 27, 2015
    #22

  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Asexperia

    Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,725
    Sent by James R:
    Yes, but please explain how the orbit was made elliptical by the astral inertia.
    Why elliptical, by the way? Why not square or circular or egg-shaped?

    The orbit is elliptical because the Earth actually not only revolves around the Sun, but also around the center of mass between the Earth and Sun.

    It sounds like your astral inertia theory is the same as Newton's law of gravity. Is there anything different about it?

    The astral inertia is determined by the momentum or quantity of movement, not only the mass.
     
    Asexperia, Jul 27, 2015
    #23

  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Asexperia

    Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,725
    A change in the postulate # 2:

    Before:
    2- Originally planets follow a straight trajectory, but It's converted into elliptical by the astral inertia of the star they orbit.

    Now:
    2- The astral inertia is responsible that some starts revolve around others.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 28, 2015
    Asexperia, Jul 28, 2015
    #24
  8. origin

    origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,890
    Do you have any math that explains astral inertia, because so far your verbal explanations have shed no light on your astral inertia.
     
    origin, Jul 28, 2015
    #25
  9. Asexperia

    Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,725
    The explanation of the astral inertia is very simple. It does not need complicated equations.
     
    Asexperia, Jul 28, 2015
    #26
  10. James R

    James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,421
    Sibilia,

    Does my car have astral inertia?

    And if I drive faster, does it have more astral inertia than before?

    How you determine the momentum of the Sun in order to calculate its astral inertia?
     
    James R, Jul 28, 2015
    #27
  11. origin

    origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,890
    Then go ahead and explain it.
     
    origin, Jul 28, 2015
    #28
  12. Daecon

    Daecon Kiwi fruit Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,133
    So use some simple equations, then.

    If it's a valid idea, then there will be some mathematics behind it.
     
    Daecon, Jul 28, 2015
    #29
  13. Asexperia

    Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,725
    Your car has classic inertia. Although classic inertia and astral inertia are based on the same principle, differ in intensity, obviously.

    Using the formula: p = mv
    Of course, in the astral inertia m is the star's mass and v it's its speed.
     
    Asexperia, Jul 28, 2015
    #30
  14. origin

    origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,890
    Speed relative to what?
     
    origin, Jul 28, 2015
    #31
  15. James R

    James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,421
    What is the speed of the Sun, Sibilia?

    And how would you go about working out the Sun's mass?
     
    James R, Jul 29, 2015
    #32
  16. Asexperia

    Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,725
    Relative to the rotational axis and relative to the center of the translational movement.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    From Internet.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 29, 2015
    Asexperia, Jul 29, 2015
    #33
  17. James R

    James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,421
    Sibilia,

    You can't appeal to Newton's gravitational theory to determine the Sun's speed because what you're proposing is an alternative gravitational theory of your own. You must use your own theory (or some existing theory in physics that you're NOT explicitly rejecting) to determine the speed. You can't use a theory you say is wrong to feed data into your new "correct" theory.
     
    James R, Jul 29, 2015
    #34
  18. Asexperia

    Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,725
    I will take that information as approximate until I can determine them based on my theory.
     
    Asexperia, Jul 29, 2015
    #35
  19. Daecon

    Daecon Kiwi fruit Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,133
    So then why should anyone acknowledge your idea when the current theory of gravity works so well?
     
    Daecon, Jul 29, 2015
    #36
  20. origin

    origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,890
    Why do you think you have theory if you admit that it doesn't work?
     
    origin, Jul 30, 2015
    #37
  21. Asexperia

    Asexperia Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,725
    Those are your opinions. My new theory about the astral inertia is valid intuitively. In may opinion, the Law of the astral inertia is more evident than the General relativity and the gravitons.

    PS: I didn't use the translator in this message.
     
    Asexperia, Jul 30, 2015
    #38
  22. origin

    origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,890
    No that is your opinion - you are the one that said you cannot determine anything with your conjecture!

    Based on your conjecture what is the acceleration of gravity on surface of the earth?
    What is the acceleration due to gravity on the moon?
    How does your conjectures explain the orbit of the earth around the sun?

    If your conjecture cannot answer those questions it is just a useless idle thought, not a theory.
     
    origin, Jul 30, 2015
    #39
    Kristoffer likes this.
  23. Daecon

    Daecon Kiwi fruit Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,133
    Newsflash: The laws of physics aren't intuitive. That's why there are so many crackpots infesting so many science forums.
     
    Daecon, Jul 30, 2015
    #40
    Kristoffer likes this.
Page 2 of 3

Share This Page