Tailoring elements demonstrating spacetime transformation?

Dr. Chris Nagel has been able to, by manipulating the knotted structure of matter with light, craft magnetized copper, transparent copper, iron harder than diamond, nickle you can shatter like glass with a hammer, and dozens of other elements with tailored properties.

His patent claims underlying relativistic transformations:

"Devices improve control by selection, inversion, fortification, uniformization and mapping background energy (including vacuum energy, dark energy and/or dark matter, grid or brane energy) and including electromagnetic energies in various forms and states of aggregation, during a tailoring process and to processes of tailoring materials. Background energy can be dis aggregated and then integrated into common forms of matter (e.g., materials) for the expressed purpose of altering electrodynamic interactions by establishing harmonic maps between the respective electromagnetic fields."

http://www.google.com/patents/CA2817391A1?cl=en


Obviously, if true, this is an potentially unprecedented paradigm shift in physics, chemistry, mathematics, material sciences, music, art, architecture.

What are your thoughts? Is he really manipulating the "geometry of spacetime"?

He mentioned that he gave a talk to a bunch of Nobel prize winners and that "the 40 minute talk went really poorly, but the 2 hour talk went really, really well." Videos posted below, this is a considerable investment of time to be able to really engage with this material, hopefully this post piqued your interest.



Original Video here:
techtv.mit.edu/videos/2616...ht-the-architect-of-matter

Q&A Here:
https://techtv.mit.edu/videos/26169-chris-nagel-q-a

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Genius or charlatan?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

His advisors and colleagues include Nobel prize winners, a 4 star general, and the former president of MIT Paul E. Gray. Having studied his work for a couple years and recognizing the elite support he's garnered, I'd say its the former.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

use this one:

http://www.google.com/patents/US20120133464?cl=en

you can actually see the images of his setup.

"Is he really manipulating the "geometry of spacetime"?

In a manner of speaking. Magnetic fields derive of moving electric fields and this process is consistent with relativity.

In point of fact, we all "manipulate the geometry of spacetime" each and every time we move any part of ourselves with respect to anything and everything else. Moreover, each and every one of us is right now moving at fantastical relativistic speeds with respect to galaxies receding from us at cosmological distances. It took us 13.7 billion years for us and the entire Milky Way galaxy to reach that velocity. Some of us get quite jaded to the fact that everything around us is fantastical and incredible, 24/7.

So, just some clever marketing, eh?

But seriously, these devices are becoming more important to materials science, nanotechnology and electronics every day. I second the motion; it's the former, and a little hype, especially if it is actually true, never really hurt anyone.

 

It

I noticed that you have posted on this topic in various other forums on the net. I am curious as to why you onlypost on this topic? I saw one dating to 2013. ..

 

Well I just hope this is an authentic claim, to me this is the only thing that makes sense since matter cannot exist with out space-time. But space can exist without matter. Space must of been first and its just another quality of the gravitational field that moves at c. Space-time is the curvature of space callapsing on itself creating matter as well as mass. Space remains massless and flat until it starts to contract FTL creating particles with even density p. Like a printer so space is the canvas the 2 dimensional surface that spacetime (matter) can be expressed. Space can expand at speed c, as the gravitational field and fill itself using space-time. An expression of the plank scale the beginning of time and space. This is why particles can become entangled becuase they are all the same particle in the first place but because of space-time they appear separate.

This is just an idea I have but if what Dr. Chris Nagel has done is correct, this is validation that my idea may be correct as well.

 

If true would you not say it's interesting?

 

I found this article

https://techtv.mit.edu/videos/26167-chris-nagel-light-the-architect-of-matter

“Nagel has been the Principal Investigator on over $40 million in DOE grants, is inventor or co-inventor of over 60 patents, has authored or co-authored many papers, and has delivered numerous presentations to National Academies. Last year he spoke at the Lindau Meeting of Nobel Laureates – the first non-nobel to present in its 60-year history.”

John Maynard Keynes, after deep study of Isaac Newton’s personal writings, expressed the insight that “Newton was not the first in the age of reason, he was the last of the magicians.” Since the time of Newton, studies of consciousness and spirit have been divorced from science. Magic has been rediscovered in quantum mechanics and emerging physical and neurobiological understandings reveal space-time-energy-matter as emerging from a fabric of quantum-light geometry, reaching into the same occult dimensions which mystics and magicians have described for millennia. Dr. Christopher Nagel may be the first mind since Newton who is -in mathematical terms- mating science with spirit through discoveries and penetrating insights into the geometry of Light. At an MIT architecture colloquium in the fall of 2013 he gave a discourse in which he described “Light as the geometry of space-time.” The head of a research team, the first in the history of humanity to alter the fundamental structure of an element, Dr. Nagel is utterly transforming physics, mathematics, science, and consciousness studies. He has added a dimension to the periodic table and may be on the cusp of discoveries which prove that every constituent element of the universe is knotted light in an infinite variety of geometric configurations.

 

I believe light is just another feature of the gravitational field and emerges a bit after quantum fluctuations.

Hawkins radiation??

 

I now believe infinite regression will soon be adressed.

 

When time was created simentaneously work was created, and energy was "now" needed -1. Enter birth of the electron the manipulater of matter at some point in time has emegerged with negative intentions.

 

Time evidently preceded matter, energy, or the propagation thereof. You cannot understand the underlying mechanism of time using only references to the propagation of energy or bound energy. In order for there even to exist bound energy which is matter, something must operate much faster (than c, as in less time). That 'something' is entanglement. It pretty much has to be.

Energy in this universe is conserved, on average, and in some cases, changes of energy states in matter are produced by means of entanglement. Is entanglement conserved? Is it possible, it may even be related in some manner to either the strong force or color charges exchanged continuously between the quarks in atomic nucleons?

These are questions which should already have been answered with certainty, if you don't mind the pun, which is intended. Sharpen all your pencils and work it out.

 

Actually in my theory the act of entanglement is at least 100 percent conserved most efficient . Theoretically time has come to a complete stop at speed c, so if time is = 0 work done is also =0 and if energy was undefined at the singularity in which space-time emerged "0" then it can as well theoretically be infinite at point singularity. So if there was an infinite amount of energy , the gravitational field, space and no time to do work energy must be 100 percent conserved at the very minimum.

The inconsistenties with the classical and quantum models arise because of the transformation of space into the curvature of spacetime. I will try and describe my thinking on this in more clarity another time.

 

So we have transparent copper and iron harder than diamond but the only mention of these incredibly revolutionary accomplishments is in a few internet websites and science forums. That smells pretty darn fishy to me.

From the limited research I have done, I cannot find anything that leads me to think this is real

 

We know that transparent forms of aluminum exist, so why not?

 

Are you referring to the process of focusing an incredibly powerful laser on a piece of aluminum less than 1/20 the width of a human hair to make it almost transparent to extreme ultraviolet radiation for about 40 femtoseconds?

Is that what you are referring to when you say there are transparent forms of aluminum, or are you talking about something else?

 

Charlatan.

The terminology in the patent description seems so vague as to be a sort of woo. And there is no explanation of what this "tailoring" actually achieves. It a vague, catch-all term.

No examples are given of any tailoring resulting in anything interesting or useful, so far as I can see.

It looks either delusional or a scam to con gullible investors into supporting his research.

But if anyone can point me to a readable article, actually giving examples of "transparent copper" or "iron harder than diamond", as a result of applying his technique, then I will gladly revise my (low) opinion of this.

It is only a patent application by the way. No patent has been granted, so far as I can tell.

 

The man's name is Hawking. If you were remotely serious you would know that.

 

Apologies I was rushing. I still stand by my claim regardless of spelling errors.

 

This new material (AluminumOxyNitride) "ALON":

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

has a cubic spinel structure, is processed into various shapes using conventional ceramic powder techniques and is four times harder than fused silica glass, and 85% as hard as sapphire. The melting point is well above that of aluminum metal (2150 degrees C for ALON as opposed to 660 degrees C for aluminum.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium_oxynitride

http://www.surmet.com/docs/Product_sheet_ALON.pdf

Since the material in an appropriate thickness is bulletproof:

http://videos.howstuffworks.com/dis...show-episode-6-bulletproof-aluminum-video.htm

But for bulletproof it's hard to beat this stuff (which already beat kevlar):

http://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/liquid-body-armor/

One obvious structural application of ALON would be in a durable spacecraft shield exposed to micrometeorite impacts.

A fictional transparent aluminum material was featured in Star Trek IV The Voyage Home, in which Scotty specified it as a strong lightweight material for constructing tanks aboard a Klingon starship as a temporary whale aquarium.

As far as I know, this material was not discovered or processed by means of the device that is the subject of the original post, but it is an example of a recently developed exotic material that has intensified interest in manipulating structural nanomaterials.