Sylwester's 'Everlasting theory'

Below is the link to my new paper (4 pages)

http://vixra.org/abs/1503.0171

The Fragmentation in the Nucleon-Nucleon Collisions within the Scale-Symmetric Physics

Summary
Here, within the atom-like structure of baryons described in the Scale-Symmetric Physics, is presented the fragmentation of hadrons in the pp and AA collisions. Applying the Stefan-Boltzmann law the calculated production of pion/kaon/proton in pp and AA collisions is in an excellent agreement with the ALICE data.

Experiments at Brookhaven’s RHIC observed an enhancement in transverse-momentum-dependent baryon/meson ratios for central AA collisions in comparison with pp collisions. Here we showed that the difference follows from the different dominating channels of fragmentation of hadrons in AA and pp collisions. In pp collisions dominate the decays of charged pions into neutral pions and the remnant with energy/mass equal to the mass distance between pions. There as well is destroyed the S state of nucleons so their mass is reduced to 727.44 MeV. On the other hand, in AA collisions dominate the decays of pions into four gluons and decays of the additional central condensates into 4 fragments as well.

The curve ratio = ratio(transverse-momentum) follows from the Stefan-Boltzmann law. It is because the fragmentation leads to super-dense condensates composed of the carriers of gluons which behave as a black body.

Emphasize that due to the very strong shortest entanglement of the carriers of gluons in the strong charge, any fragmentation of the core of baryons is impossible.

Notice that we calculated the ratios for transverse momentum with complete fragmentation (about 3 GeV) and the asymptotic values for higher transverse momentums so we can draw the curve ratio = ratio(transverse-momentum).

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Below is the link to my new paper (4 pages)

http://vixra.org/abs/1503.0181

The Composite Sham Higgs Boson with a Mass of 125 GeV in the Scale-Symmetric Physics

Summary
We know that an alternative to SUSY is composite Higgs i.e. Higgs composed of more fundamental particles but we need a fifth force between the new fundamental particles – it is the confinement described in this paper. The confinement follows from the Mexican-hat mechanism described within the Scale-Symmetric Physics and such mechanism concerns the luminal Einstein-spacetime components which are the new fundamental particles the Higgs boson consists of. But due to the very small coupling constant associated with the confinement (1.9*10^-15), the condensates are the very unstable particles – it does not concern the central condensate in core of baryons because such condensate is created by the indestructible torus/charge.

Calculated here the radius of the mainstream sham Higgs boson with a mass of 125 GeV is about 1.69*10^-18 m.

Calculated here the coupling constant for the shortest-distance quantum entanglement is about 3.1*10^92. This value is very big so destruction of the torus/charge of baryons by the other interactions is impossible. It is the reason that inside nucleons are the three super-dense gluon fields.

From the Scale-Symmetric Physics follows that the constituents of the composite Higgs have not gravitational mass around TeV, their mass is very small - it is the mass of the carriers of gluons (6.67*10^-67 kg). But the non-gravitational energy frozen inside the carriers of gluons is about 0.6*10^119 times greater than their gravitational mass. It is the reason that the shortest-distance quantum entanglement is such tremendously strong.

The hierarchy problem (or naturalness) is wrongly understood. The S-SP shows that we do not need mass around TeV to solve the hierarchy problem. Just the correct interpretation of the hidden energy which follows from the mainstream quantum physics, which is about 10122 times higher than the observed one (it is the non-gravitational energy frozen inside the carriers of gluons and photons), solves the hierarchy problem. But there should be in existence at least one Type Higgs-boson condensate with mass about 17.1 TeV. Mass densities of such condensates are the same so radius of the 17.1 TeV condensate is bigger than the mainstream Higgs boson and is in an approximation 0.87*10^-17 m. Such condensates cannot be inside the mainstream Higgs boson.

The Planck mass is in reality close to the geometric mean of the gravitational mass and the tremendous non-gravitational energy frozen inside the carriers of gluons and photons i.e. frozen inside the Einstein-spacetime components (i.e. frozen inside the still undetected neutrino-antineutrino pairs).

Presented here the Composite Higgs Model (CHM) is characterized by the mass of the lightest new particle and its coupling.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Below is the link to my new paper (3 pages)

http://vixra.org/abs/1503.0212

Lifetimes of Higgs, W and Z Bosons in the Scale-Symmetric Physics

Abstract
Here, within the Scale-Symmetric Physics, we calculated the rigorous lifetimes of Higgs (H) boson, W and Z bosons expressed in yoctoseconds [ys] (yocto is the inverse of the 24 powers of ten): for H is 0.282 ys, for W is 0.438 ys whereas for Z is 0.386 ys. They are the upper limits for experimental data and it is obvious that the experimental data should be close to such limits.

The decay width of H boson (about 3.4 GeV/(cc) gives 0.194 ys, the decay width of W boson (about 2.1 GeV/(cc) gives 0.316 ys whereas the decay width of Z boson (about 2.5 GeV/(cc) gives 0.264 ys. The calculated here theoretical results are consistent with experimental data.

The lifetime of Higgs boson predicted within the Standard Model (SM), 0.156 zeptoseconds [zs] (zepto is the inverse of the 21 powers of ten), is inconsistent with experimental data - it suggests that SM is at least incomplete or partially incorrect.

The main method to determine the lifetimes of particles follows from measurement of the decay width. But using this widely accepted method, we obtain the lifetime of the Higgs boson a factor of one thousandth of the value predicted by the Standard Model. It causes that some “scientists” try to change the widely accepted method to obtain from the experimental data the SM value. As usually, when a mainstream theory fails, to fit theoretical results to experimental data, “scientists” apply some approximations, mathematical tricks and free parameters. The truth is obvious - the experimental lifetime of the sham Higgs boson with a mass of 125 GeV is inconsistent with the SM prediction.

Photons inside strong fields behave as gluons.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

That is actually a very interesting analysis, Sylwester. Do you think there is a "real" Higgs fundamental particle at higher energy?

 

The Scale-Symmetric-Physics (S-SP) predictions, concerning the Type Higgs-boson condensates, I described in October, 2013:

http://vixra.org/abs/1310.0094

There should be at least two additional such condensates with a mass of about 321 GeV and 17.1 TeV. The first signal can be partially suppressed by the two observed peaks one at 125 GeV (it is the discovered composite Higgs) and by the broadened peak at about 200 GeV (see Fig. in cited paper) - the sum 125 + 200 is close to the 321 GeV.

Of course, there is in existence the non-gravitating field (i.e. the Higgs field) which during the inflation partially transformed into the gravitating luminal Einstein spacetime. According to the S-ST, the Einstein spacetime is grainy and consists of the still undetected gravitating neutrino-antineutrino pairs. The real Higgs mechanism described within S-SP, shows how the non-gravitating field transformed into the smallest gravitational masses i.e. the neutrinos. The S-SP shows as well that the tremendous non-gravitating energy frozen in a neutrino (it cannot be observed directly) is about 119 powers of ten greater than the gravitational mass of the neutrino - it is the lacking energy predicted by the mainstream quantum physics.

In reality, the Planck mass/energy does not concern a gravitational mass. The Planck mass/energy concerns the luminal/superluminal limit of Nature. Just the geometric mean of the tremendous non-gravitating energy frozen inside a neutrino and its gravitational mass is close to the Planck mass. The real Higgs boson must be a spinless particle so the real Higgs boson consists of two confined Einstein-spacetime components. Its gravitational mass is very small and beyond precision of the present-day detectors but the not observed directly energy frozen in the real Higgs boson is tremendous. It solves the Hierarchy Problem.

The discovered composite Higgs boson with a mass of 125 GeV consists of the confined real Higgs bosons with very low gravitational mass but with tremendous non-gravitating energy frozen inside them.

 

Below is the link to my new paper (2 pages)

http://vixra.org/abs/1503.0268

Critical Comments on Emission of Gravitational Potential Energy

Abstract
Here, within the Scale-Symmetric Physics, the critical remarks about luminal gravitational waves and luminal gravitons are presented. The mechanism of emission of the potential gravitational energy differs very much from the mechanism described within the General Relativity.

 

Below is the link to my new paper (4 pages)

http://vixra.org/abs/1504.0024

What are the Radions, Real Higgs Bosons and Massons?

Abstract
In the original Kaluza-Klein theory (KK-theory), the radion, i.e. the circumference or size of the fifth dimension, was invariant. In the newer versions of this theory, the radion is not constant. On the other hand, in the Scale-Symmetric Physics (S-SP), the radions are quantized and their sizes follow from the succeeding phase transitions of the Higgs field. In S-SP there are the four radions associated respectively with the loops responsible for the quantum entanglement, with the weak charge of neutrinos, with the strong charge in baryons (the radion is the neutral pion), and with the superstrong charge of the cosmic structure before the expansion of the Universe (the radion was the very early Universe). All such radions are the pseudoscalars.

The real Higgs boson is composed of two non-rotating and entangled (it is the shortest-distance entanglement) Einstein-spacetime components with antiparallel unitary spins so it is the pseudoscalar as well. But the condensates composed of the real Higgs bosons are the scalars as it is in the Standard Model. Just the detected Higgs boson with a mass of 125 GeV is the composite Higgs boson built of the confined real Higgs bosons.

Here as well we explained the difference between photon, gluon, masson, photomasson and gluomasson (in S-SP we must replace the massless gravitons for the massons that are the binary systems of non-rotating Einstein-spacetime components with parallel unitary spins).

 

Below is the link to my new paper (5 pages)

http://vixra.org/abs/1504.0123

The Large-Scale Structure of the Universe

Abstract
A single equation within Theory of Everything would be infinitely complex so we should formulate a fractal skeletal theory which should lead to the much simpler partial theories. In such theory should not appear free parameters and the indeterminate mathematical forms. The Scale-Symmetric Theory (S-ST) is such skeletal theory. Its structure looks as a Christmas tree.

Here, within a model which is dual to the structure of baryons, applying the S-ST, we calculated the median effective radius of the Type 1 cosmological voids in observed redshift coordinates, number of such voids in the Universe, the quantized median effective radii of such voids, radius of the WMAP Cold Spot and the Cosmological Ruler. Obtained results are consistent with observational facts. Moreover, there is calculated the expected void abundance.

Presented here theoretical results suggest that the picture of the high-redshift Universe obtained within the mainstream cosmology is misshapen.

 

Below is the link to my new paper (3 pages)

http://vixra.org/abs/1504.0156

The Origin of the Antiproton-to-Proton Ratio and the Proton Flux as a Function of Rigidity for Cosmic Rays

Abstract
Here, within the Scale-Symmetric Physics that leads to the atom-like structure of baryons, the antiproton-to-proton ratio in the energy coordinates and some qualitative and partially quantitative description of proton flux as a function of rigidity are presented.

Obtained results are consistent with the AMS data.

 

Below is the link to my new paper (5 pages)

http://vixra.org/abs/1505.0066

Selected Cosmological Problems

Abstract
Here, within the Scale-Symmetric Physics, we present four selected cosmological problems.

In the Universe the total dynamic pressure of baryonic matter, dark matter and dark energy practically should not depend on spatial coordinates so the baryonic matter displaces dark matter.

The high-energy astrophysical particles are produced by baryonic plasma - there appear segments composed of charge-anticharge pairs and their cascade annihilation leads to high-energy particles especially neutrinos, photons and electrons. Flavor ratio of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos should be the same for source and at Earth: (electron-neutrinos-to-muon-neutrinos-to-tau-neutrinos) = (1 : 0 : 0).

In the gamma ray spectrum produced by the inner Milky Way there is an apparent maximum at energies about 1.5 - 4 GeV and a drop at energy close to 30 GeV - here we show that these features follow from the weak interactions of the components of baryonic plasma, not from dark matter annihilation.

The Holographic Principle concerns the quantum entanglement, not gravitational interactions. It causes that there are both the real volumetric Universe and the cosmological hologram in which is stored some part of information.

 

Still talking to yourself. Take care.

 

You are not right. Can you see the 62,000 views of this thread and many unique IP-downloads of my papers on vixra? Just readers try to understand why many mainstream theories are such messy. They do not discuss but they read about new ideas.

For example, nucleons are the most important particles. But the quark model does not lead to exact mass, spin and muonic radius of them. Why? Is the quark model of proton nonsensical? Are the fractional electric charges of quarks the science fiction? Just we can assume that the very dense fields in hadrons exchange elementary electric charge so the mean electric charges of the fields are fractional. Such explanation is natural whereas the fractional charges of quarks are nonsensical. And so on… In the mainstream theories there is tremendous number of nonsensical ideas.

Why many scientists support the nonsensical ideas that the Universe was created from nothing or that there was the exit from the black-hole state without any cause? Just they completely do not understand physics.

 

Here

https://www.quantamagazine.org/20150428-how-quantum-pairs-stitch-space-time/

we can find the article titled

“The Quantum Fabric of Space-Time”
In this article we can read about ideas concerning internal structure of spacetime and the holographic principle. Not all interpretations and conclusions are correct.

The Scale-Symmetric Physics presented in my book, 84 papers and this thread shows that most important to understand structure of spacetime are the succeeding phase transitions of the Higgs field composed of superluminal pieces of space. The first phase transition leads to the superluminal carriers of quantum entanglement (entanglons – they produce the spooky action at a distance). The second phase transition leads to the luminal nodes mentioned in the above article – they are the neutrino-antineutrino pairs composed of the entanglons. The nodes, due to the internal helicity of the entanglons, curve the Higgs field (the produced gradients are the gravitational fields). The two first phase transitions transform the non-gravitating pieces of space into the gravitating nodes – it is the true Higgs mechanism.

Gravitational fields are directly associated with the superluminal Higgs field.
Standard Model is associated with the luminal nodes so we cannot unify gravity with quantum physics within the same methods.

Cosmological Hologram is not associated with gravity, it is associated with quantum entanglement so there are both the real volumetric Universe and the cosmological hologram where is stored a part of information via the quantum entanglement of the nodes.

It is very difficult to detect a node because of its very low mass and because resultant weak charge is equal to zero.

 

Here

www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/05/150514085655.htm

we can read that left-handed cosmic magnetic field could explain missing antimatter.

Notice that the left-handed internal helicity of the Universe is the foundations of my Scale-Symmetric Physics. Just such initial internal helicity of a vortex in the Einstein spacetime leads to the matter-antimatter asymmetry in our Universe. You can read it in my book or here

http://vixra.org/abs/1411.0534

 

Here

www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/05/150515083408.htm

we can read that maybe dark matter is not made up of heavy particles after all.

It is consistent with the model of dark matter presented within my Scale-Symmetric Physics:

http://vixra.org/abs/1502.0132

 

Below is the link to my new paper (3 pages)

http://vixra.org/abs/1505.0124

The Superluminal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Abstract
Here, within the Scale-Symmetric Physics (S-SP), we present a new interpretation of the Quantum Mechanics i.e. the superluminal interpretation (SIQM).

Werner Heisenberg used term “the ideological superstructures” to the hidden-variables theory. All known mainstream interpretations of quantum mechanics deserve such a term. It follows from the fact that all mainstream interpretations neglect physical consistency of the 3-dimensional wave functions. A wave function which fills up the Universe cannot be a coherent physical object when distant points of the wave function cannot communicate with superluminal speed. Just period of a local change in the wave function (due to a luminal Standard-Model interaction) cannot be shorter than size of the wave function divided by superluminal speed.

The Planck length is the lower limit for size of gravitating particles. Objects with sizes smaller than the Planck length must be non-gravitating so non-relativistic and they must be superluminal. The S-SP, due to the succeeding phase transitions, leads from the objects with sizes smaller than the Planck length (so superluminal) to objects with sizes close to the Planck length (so luminal) and larger.

The question is not whether there are in existence some superluminal entanglons responsible for quantum entanglement but why we cannot see their motion directly. And the answer is very simple - just they are not the Standard-Model objects, their size is much smaller than the Planck length and the degree of filling of spacetime is very low.

 

Below is the link to my new paper (1 page)

http://vixra.org/abs/1505.0177

Duality of Time from Quantum Entanglement

Abstract
Experimentalists used an entangled state of two photons to show that time is going in different way for internal and external observers.

Here, within the Scale-Symmetric Physics (S-SP), we show that such scenario concerns the elliptical states of electron in atoms. There are two different entangled circular states of an elliptical state and jumps of entanglon, responsible for quantum entanglement, between them. It causes that global energy is static whereas an internal observer associated with one of two entangled circular states (the clock) sees evolution of the other circular state. It is the duality of time from quantum entanglement.

Similar mechanism concerns two mass states of proton and of neutron but there is exchanged electric charge between the very dense gluon fields. Such exchanges lead to the mean fractional charges of the dense gluon fields.

 

Below is the link to my new paper (3 pages)

http://vixra.org/abs/1505.0227

Dynamics of the “Bullet Cluster” (Interactions of the Dark Matter)

Abstract
Here, within the Scale-Symmetric Physics (S-SP), we analyse the internal interactions in the dark matter and the weak interactions via leptons of the entangled dark matter with the hadronic and leptonic matter.

 

Below is the link to my new paper (10 pages)

http://vixra.org/abs/1506.0092

The Scale-Symmetric Physics as the Realistic/Unique String Theory

Summary
Here we proved that the Scale-Symmetric Physics is the realistic/unique string theory.

Due to the new symmetries, i.e. the four-particle symmetry and the saturation of interactions of the superluminal binary systems of closed strings (entanglons), the infinitesimal spin of tachyons and preserving the spin-1 signature of spacetime, there appeared the succeeding phase transitions of the non-gravitating tachyonic Higgs field that existence follows from General Relativity.

During the inflation, there were produced spacetime objects with 6- (tachyons), 10- (superluminal entanglons) and 26 degrees of freedom (the luminal Einstein-spacetime components i.e. the neutrino-antineutrino pairs). The luminal Einstein spacetime stopped the inflation.

The Higgs mechanism took place during the inflation and transformed partially the non-gravitating tachyonic Higgs field into the neutrinos i.e. into the smallest gravitational masses.
Since the end of the inflation, there can be created the 58- (the cores of baryons and bare charged leptons) and 122-degrees-of-freedom (the cores of the fundamental cosmological objects i.e. cores of the protoworlds) objects.

The 5-degrees-of-freedom compactifications of the 26-, 58- and 122-degrees-of-freedom objects consist of three fields i.e. there is a spin-1/2 torus/charge/fermion, a spin-0 two-circles/pair-of-radions/boson and a spin-0 ball/dilaton/scalar. When velocity of baryons increases then mass of radion decreases (it leads to the running coupling for the strong interactions), whereas mass of torus and mass and volume of dilaton increase. The charge-radion symmetry is the realistic fermion-boson supersymmetry. The superpartners postulated in the mainstream string theory are not in existence.

In the Scale-Symmetric Physics appear following theories: the Type T theory of tachyonic Higgs field, Type S bosonic string theory of superluminal entanglons, Type E supersymmetric theory of the Einstein-spacetime components and neutrinos, Type B supersymmetric theory of baryons, mesons and charged leptons, and the Type C supersymmetric theory of fundamental cosmological structures.

S-SP shows that due to the very simple structure of the 10-degrees-of-freedom spacetime object, the non-unique 11-dimensional superstring M-theory cannot be realized by Nature.

In unique string theory, pure dualities should not appear. Due to the succeeding phase transitions, in the S-SP string theory, there appears the approximate duality (i.e. we can apply the same methods to self-similar shapes) concerning similar shapes i.e. the self-similar duality (SS-duality).


A commentary
There are the mathematically very complicated big mainstream theories (millions of pages) but we still cannot within these theories calculate from some initial conditions the ESSENTIAL QUANTITIES i.e. physical constants and masses and spins of proton, neutron, electron and neutrinos to be consistent with experimental data (!). We still do not understand the origin of the dark matter, and so on (!). It looks as a childish game.

These big problems are solved within the Scale-Symmetric Physics that is the only one realistic/unique string theory. Why scientific community cannot see it?

 

You have to take a break from posting new papers, every other day you post a new paper.......

Sit down and now compile and write a book, send your basic SS theory to few journals (try getting out of vixra)...and see people's perspective would change...

........Please start a new thread and put your original SS theory, in brief, and open it for argument...Answer all the questions raised, without citing any other paper....