Reality

I guess that explains why many people only spit, never swallow.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

A syntactic operator is a coherent SCSPL processor capable of or responsive to telic recursion.[1]
The universe is made out of one essential substance (infocognition) having two aspects ; information and cognition. It could not be made of information alone as without a syntax to process that information in, it means nothing. Consider a full stop on its own without a language which contains a meaning for it e.g. "symbol for separating sentences". A syntactic operator is an entity in the universe which is able to process information by virtue of being able to read-write SCSPL syntax. The Global Syntactic Operator is God, there are agent level syntactic operators (humans) and tiny microscopic quantum syntactic operators that form the unit of perception called Noeons. When a syntactic operator is driven by purpose through telic recursion (at any level, global or otherwise) it becomes known as a Telor.

http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Syntactic_operator

A syntactic operator as understood in the CTMU is a reality embedded entity without which human intellect would not be possible.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

And the evidence for this is...?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

The "SCSPL" comprises the basic syntax of reality augmented by a "supertautological structure", which latter dynamically and reflexively unfolds the truth content of set of fundamental absolute truths (logical axioms) in the form of logical tautologies, so as to optimize something called "general utility" in an inherently teleological manner. This leads to a purely syntactical definition of cognitive reality in which the world essentially designs itself, and in which intelligence unfolds in an autonomous goal-oriented process of cosmic evolution by self-selection.

http://best-possible.wikia.com/wiki/PZ_comments_on_Langan's_CTMU

Yes. This is reality.

 

Operable intellect.

 

For those who want to know more see: http://www.megafoundation.org/CTMU/Q&A/Archive.html

 

God is real. God is great. God is love.

There are at least six different ways that I know of that one can "interact" with God. To chalk them up to meaningful coincidences and hallucinations would be illogical.

 

In another thread I wrote of how Quantum Physics can reveal the essence of God. The fact is that it can be categorized as a science that paints a picture of a world that is beyond appearances but is still testable and knowable. It is the final word on science I believe. Unless of course you believe in something even more fundamental.

 

Ontological Dualism: http://tworealities.org/theory/foundations-of-subjective-reality/

 

How, exactly, is that "evidence"?

 

The intellect operates syntactically. Thought is language.

 

What is the six ways to interact with God that are so persuasive that it would be illogical not to a believe them?

 

1.) The television.
2.) Radio.
3.) Light.
4.) Books.
5.) Signs.
6.) Dreams.
7.) Events in your life.
8.) Spiritually.

 

Really, these are the ways to communicate with God and they are so persuasive that to dismiss them is illogical? I seriously have no clue what you are talking about here.
Let's just pick Television, how do you communicate with God using the television?

 

Every time I am having a significant or life altering day God reaches out to me in some way. Whether it be relating to me from the television or the lighting in the room I am in. Or more familiarly dreams.

http://www.iflscience.com/physics/measurement-rules-quantum-universe

 

I still don't get it. Are you saying that when you feel bad and you watch a television program that makes you feel better that it is illogical not to assume that the program was from God?

 

Something like that except it's not as cut and dry as you think. The communication has everything to do with what I have experienced and if God wishes to make Himself known to me He will communicate vital information.

 

I had a number of spiritual experiences in '12. It got me starting to treat the CTMU seriously.

 

So this is just a personal feeling. That is fine, but it is a stretch for you to say that just because you feel something that it means that anyone that does not have your feelings is illogical. I do not see how it is illogical to assume this has absolutely nothing to do with God, and it has everything to do with your feelings.

 

Yeah, you're still just saying BS and not actually presenting any evidence.