Light, dark and clear

Added - all atoms are transparent and only by density of atoms do we see them .

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

If you look around you , you can clearly see objects, the space between your eyes and the object is full of this ''clear''.
You can turn 360 degrees and you can clearly see that you are surrounded by this clear that is not really clear but expanded light, like lightning but expanded,

example - take a white cube and expand it without adding matter, the density will firstly become transparent, then the cube will vanish.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

diluted plasma in short.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

The distance between my eyes and what I'm looking at is transparent.

Your example is bs.

 

The air is transparent, dark is transparent, light is seen but not seen in a space, the damping matrix is the solute, the volume of space is the solvent. The combination of the two is the solution of the dilution.

 

Believe me, squint at a light bulb and modify the process of the solution to un-dilute the solution.

 

google provided image

Without sight this is how light would look.

 

Google provided pic,
like the over exposure to sight in this shot.

 

You may be wondering why I am thinking this, if you consider other species , some species that can see in the dark have an opposite effect in the day, and the lux is to sensitive for them in the day time, the species sees an over exposure.

http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20150219-the-worlds-most-sensitive-eyes

 

This is just so much bollocks... it has ceased to be amusing at this point...

"diluted plasma"? Light and vision as a "solution"? Do you even understand what a solution actually is... dumb question, of course you don't.

Space is not full of CLEAR... CLEAR IS NOT A THING.

If you are incapable of understanding that, you have my pity. If you are simply refusing to to continue this charade... you still have my pity for having nothing better/more constructive to do with your time.

 

Oh great, you found new terms that you do not understand and will improperly use to describe nonsense.

 

That would be like a blind seeing-eye dog trying to lead a sighted person.

 

I think it is safe to say nobody wonders what you are thinking at all.

Animals that have adapted to see in low light do not do well in bright light - not sure why you find this so amazing.

The lux is too sensitive? It is so cute to see you mangle the english language when you try to use words you do not understand.

 

You didn't know that Lux is sensitive?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Doesn't she look just precious?!

Oh... wait, that isn't what he was referring to?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

space is full of a clear.

I do not understand why you all pretend you do not understand, I ask anyone if the space between an object and them is clear, and what do you think the reply is?

Yes it is very clear that we can see clearly through the clear.

 

What happens to plasma when it breaks its confinement?


Solute is like electrolytes
solvent is what breaks the electrolytes down
the solution is the mixture

I no very well what definitions I am using for comparing wording.

 

The big bang was created by a limitation of thought. The only conceivable logic was a starting point from a nothing singular point, because by finite observation humanity can not perceive anything else.
A only logical option possible by finite observation.

A logical error, the true logic is to realise how the logic was derived in the first place. A true logical tactician would not be complacent in such poor logic.

 

And by your logic holes are full of an empty. But to normal people, the hole is empty and is not full of anything.

We understand; you are simply wrong. In this case you are simply using vocabulary incorrectly.

 

You're not even pretending to learn any more.

It's like you've given up and are just posting any old crap for hits and giggles.

 

I will add a diagram with explanation showing the big bang logical failure. The big bang is presumed to be the cause of the entire Universe and creation, perceived by the expansion of matter into space, not an expansion of space, a gain in the volume of space by the matter increasing distance from the observer.
Space is not a solid like a balloons surface, the matter are the solids in a space, an infinite space.
Now logic suggests that a steady state Universe could of been prior to an event in space that caused the steady state Universe to expand.
Any matter that left out finite observation range before our existence would not be seen or thought of to exist.
The red circle represents our finite observation and the present matter expansion,
The other circles represents expanding matter outside our visual boundary of perspective vanishing point of an object.

The logic of the big bang is poor.