Actually the tracks are attached to the planet Earth, so you should be asking: "What moves, the train or the planet Earth?"
You quoted my question, so I can only conclude you believe this post answers my question. It doesn't....unless, of course, you are trying to say that you have just made a new name for a basic physics principle that has been known for hundreds of years, so you haven't really done anything useful. If that's what you are trying to say, then I agree.
What's that basic physics principle? I have understood that according to Relativity, considering the train as a reference system are the tracks that move.
Completely misunderstanding special relativity does not give you the tools to demonstrate your conjectures are superior.
Why not?, Einstein started from the Newton's ideas. Parmenides started form the Heraclitus' ideas. Aristotle started from the Plato's ideas. With all due respect to Einstein.
Because if you don't know Relativity, there is no way you could possibly know if your ideas are superior or not.
Newton understood Aristotle. Einstein understood Newton. You don't understand Einstein. Therefore because you don't work on the bleeding edge of human knowledge about the behavior of phenomena of the universe, you cannot make progress AND you cannot fairly judge what you post is superior to Einstein.
Let's watch this image again. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! 1- The Relativity focuses on the trajectory, which is different for both reference systems. But the two observers are correct. (I agree) 2- The Inexorability focuses on the destination of the thrown body. There is only one (inexorable) destination. 3- Time is relative with respect to the speed. (both theories) 4- Time es independent with respect to the distance (space). (Me) 5- Time is inexorable in despite of the reference frame. (Me)
SPACE-TIME DIAGRAMS The sequence 1-2-1 is inexorable regardless of the reference frame. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! The lines O1 (blue) and O2 (green) correspond to the trajectory of the observers. The brown triangle represents the light cone and the small circles represent the signals from the detectors (events) when the light arrive to them. For the O1 one of the detectors of O2 turns on first, later the both his turn on simultaneously and finally the other one of O2 turns on. For the O2 one of the detectors of O1 turns on first, later the both his turn on simultaneously and finally the other one of O1 turns on. In the graph 2 we see the drawing that makes the O2 where his timeline would be vertical and the line of O1 would be inclined. In conclusion, both observers watch the same sequence 1-2-1 of events. This sequence is inexorable. For more information see the video: Length Contraction and Space-Time animation Elvis Sibilia of America (ESA)
THE SUCCESSION 1-2-1 Man has always thought of the relation between space and time, from the point of view of the placement of an object or an event. Einstein was able to visualize the result of putting together two observers in different reference systems. Time is not a dimension of space. The sequence 1-2-1 is the link between a quiet observer and another that is moving at nearly the speed of light.
There is no way to tell which is the 'quiet observer' and the other moving at nearly the speed of light.
Totally OT, pardon, please. Ophiolite, I know what your handle means, but every time I see it, I think "snake-bearing mineral". Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Back to y'all...
IS THE SPACE STRAIGHT OR CURVED? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! In the space-time graph O1 jumps. Following the principle of relativity the O1 sees that he describes a straight line (up and down). The still O2 sees the O1 describes a parabola. Why the Theory of Relativity does not take into account the straight trajectory of O1? Because its interest is to say that space is curved, so they can explain erroneously gravity. Hasta luego.
THE BECOMING-TIME DUALITY The becoming is the inherent property of matter and bodies to undergo changes continuously. The duration is the continuity or term of beings and phenomena in reality: the world and the universe. Time is the interval occurred between two fixed moments. The becoming-time is the continuous succession of ordered moments from start to finish. No becoming no duration, and no duration no time. Time is the dimension of becoming, not space.
THE PHILOCHRONY The Philochrony (from the Greek philo: friend and khronos: time) is the formal science that studies the properties of time and space, and classifies things according to their duration. It also exposes the Theory of Inexorability. The Philochrony is independent of any belief, dogma or organization of knowledge. In accordance with their duration things are classified in: Eternal, durable, perishable, ephemeral, fleeting and nonexistent. a) The eternal things don't have beginning neither ending; like the matter. For believers, God and the Paradise are eternal. b) The durable things last a lot of time. They are divided in: - Centennial, if they last among 100 to 999 years. For example, the fir tree and the saguaro cactus. - Millennial, among 1,000 to 999,000 years. The secuoya tree. - Millionaire, more than a million years. The geologic eras, the life of the planets and stars. c) Perishable things have a little duration; they last among one day to 99 years. The human being’s life. d) Ephemeral things have a short duration, some hours. e) The fleeting things have a very short duration, some seconds or fractions of second. The wink, the rhythm of the heart. f) The nonexistence is the lack of existence, no duration. The planet X between Mars and Jupiter. All things possess existence and essence. Sibilia