Science already knows the magic of gravity

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by theorist-constant12345, Feb 25, 2015.

  1. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    I call it the ''push and pull'' effect at the same time.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Daecon Kiwi fruit Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,133
    I'm pretty sure experimental evidence disproves your hypothesis, otherwise stars wouldn't be able to form.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    This is drivel.

    Your "diagram" is meaningless.
    (And it's also not any sort of response to my "electrical question").
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    Stars make atoms, atoms originated from the hydrogen atom that originated from the battle of matter v anti - matter in the first few seconds of the big bang.
    Hydrogen then formed helium, gases that started the stars that then started a Proton-proton chain that then started to spit out particles that eventually formed the earth and in essence us.
    Density means more force. 2 atoms , then 3 atoms, then 400, then 100, and so on.
     
  8. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    Well thats what I was getting at, two opposing electrical forces will repel each other, the diagrams are accurate Physics with the exception of the missing neutrons,
     
  9. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    I think I may just have worked out how and why the planets are made, and how they got their orbits around the sun.
    another day though for that one.
     
  10. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    The diagrams are NOT accurate.
    They're not even close to accurate.
     
  11. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    are you trying to suggest an electron is not attracted to a Proton and vice versus?

    The only possible Physics is my diagram.

    What is the white stuff between atoms called?
     
  12. Daecon Kiwi fruit Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,133
    I'm pretty sure astroscience already has that one figured out.
     
  13. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    I mean the real reason, the true version, it just came to me has we were speaking, the big bang stands and I think I can explain why we are centralised and why there is expanding matter, but anther time for that one.
     
  14. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Oh that would be interesting.
    Especially in view of the fact that we are NOT "centralised".
     
  15. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    Well either way I can explain why the dust particles rotated the sun,

    You know the cannon ball explanation and how the cannon ball curves back down to earth without enough speed to travel straight.

    The Sun spat out particles that were angled and not straight , the particles got caught in the suns own gravity and wrapped themselves in orbit instead of leaving to eventually form the planets.

    edit to first form small stars that didnt make the grade.
     
  16. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    there you go, im tired now sorry
     

    Attached Files:

  17. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Uh, yes.
    It's called gravity.
    And it's common knowledge.
    In fact you've participated in threads on this forum that discuss gravity causing orbits.

    Oh, and your diagram is utter (and incorrect) crap.
    (As is, so far as I can [1] the attached equations).

    1 Since you haven't specified what the symbols mean then it's hard to make out what they're (supposedly) saying.
     
  18. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,890
    Your picture is from a site called funnyjunk. You realize that is a joke don't you? You should not not post a files with citations.
     
  19. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    Was just representing the curve with the diagram, sorry was rather tired I should of said and put google provided. also.

    Ignore the maths ont he diagram I was not proving maths.
     
  20. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,890
    So you don't realize it is a joke?!
     
  21. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,421
    This thread is a disaster zone. I have moved it to the appropriate location.
     
    Kristoffer likes this.
  22. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    THE DIAGRAM IS WRONG.
     
  23. rpenner Fully Wired Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,833
    "Curving the path of a bullet" was a fictional skill invented by Mark Millar for his comic book series "Wanted" and adapted for the movie of the same name in 2008.
     

Share This Page