Science already knows the magic of gravity

So when are you going to learn something?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Please don't.

We've had more than enough of your attempt to science.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Mods can you please protect me from this troll type behaviour from people, you can clearly see that Dr Toad is trying the you have not learnt anything path because by posts he knows that winds me up, that is a poor flame attempt and a suggested sock puppet.

Daecon trying to flame , completely nothing to do with the thread with what he is saying and suggesting I do not continue to learn.

Also saying WE, whos we exactly?

A suggested second sock, these forum members usually avoid my threads, the last two days I seem to be , being tag teamed.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I consider it trolling for you to come to a science site and spew anti-science and anti-logic. You keep spinning wilder and wilder tales until people get frustrated with you and then you complain to the mods, that is what I call troll type behaviour!

 

I suggest to you that there is very little science going on in this forum and most other science forums on the internet.
People are out to bicker , it has become a game to try and get people banned, I am one of the many few who are actually trying to look for new science amongst the vast knowledge there is.
Again a flame post from yourself nothing to do with the topic, the idea is the talking point and not myself.

I consider it trolling because it is trolling if your post has nothing to do with the thread, the intention is clear.

I wish you good day, I do not wish to argue, I only wish to discuss science.

 

Do you even know what a sockpuppet is, tc?

 

Freedom of speech is not freedom from criticism or freedom from speech.
You aren't being persecuted for who you are, you are being judged and criticized for how you act in public.
As the person making extraordinary claims in every thread you start, you have an absolute burden of proof to establish your claims warrant consideration.

 

No, you are just posting woo. That's why you are getting grief. Not because you are looking for new science, but because you are continually, repeatedly and intentionally ignoring new science.

Then do so. "Light is not a thing; only dark is clear!" is not science.

 

This thread, like most, has gone nowhere fast and become nothing but flamebait...

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Overly dramatic roll there

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Your posting history concerning the nature of white light speaks for itself.

 

Again deflected at me in a Psuedo section about some Psuedo science.

Light is not the thread topic. Do you have any input in regards to what the mechanism of gravity is?

 

Current theory suggests it's the curvature of spacetime, caused by mass. The "rubber sheet" analogy is usually the go-to analogy for demonstrating how this happens.

Another hypothesis suggests gravity is a force transmitted by carrier particles - gravitons.

 

Yes that is the process of gravity and how gravities work is done, and gravitons is the suggested un-proved mechanism,the magic has such.
I have been saying I think the magic involved is not a graviton, but a suggested offset of the negative and positive energy in mass on an atomic level , what do you think of this?

 

What do you mean by "negative and positive energy in mass"?

Can you give an example?

 

It is hard to explain but I will try my best.

If you can pretend and imagine a 10 mm cubed solid box, ( of cause we are considering the density in just a generalised nature).


If you then know the volume of this box ( I am worried about posting it I have been warned to leave maths alone) ,

then pretend for every cubic mm is equal to 1 atom.( I do understand atoms are smaller than 1 mm cubed),

So in pretending and making it up - the volume is equal to number of atoms of the cube.


Do you understand this so far?

 

Okay. Could you not just say a cube measuring 10^3 atoms?

Maths is also not a strong point for me.

 

I have got be careful on the maths but yes I think you have the first part easy enough understood.

In reality we would have to account for every atom, density, the molecular bonding material ( I call that the white stuff that holds atoms together).

Ok, to continue if you can then pretend we know what we are talking about and we calculate the total number of atoms times the energy contained in a single atom to give us total potential positive energy contained in the box of all the atoms.


Then after that if you can pretend that all the positive energy in the box has the exact equal amount of negative energy .

(yes negative energy is not really a good saying), positivity and negativity being equal.

All of this so far is a box in a void, there is no gravity the box is static,

so far are you clear?

 

Why would it have any "negative" energy? You seem to be making up negative energy just because.

The box, by the very nature of having mass, would generate a gravitational field in the surrounding space.

 

I.e. zero energy.