Science thought, a journey back in time.

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by theorist-constant12345, Jan 30, 2015.

  1. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    The present Physics is wrong, this is what I am saying , it is all about what is perceived, like a puzzle of multiple Shroedler cats.

    The order of information over time, and the order that knowledge was gained is fragmented, by systematic approaches this how I get answers from looking at your knowledge and considering what you have .
    By finding and looking for a better order of gained information and considering your present knowledge and considering other comparisons and possibilities.
    Space has no value , infinite or finite that is it,no time, no medium, no ether,

    p.s saying no medium I believe it has a energy medium but not in the topic yet.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Then you are wrong.

    The fact that you have no idea what Schrödinger meant with his cat shows that you don't know what you're talking about. (And the fact that A) you can't spell it and B) can't be bothered to look it up shows that you're only interested in your own particular fantasies, not facts.).

    Unmitigated drivel.

    Gibberish.

    Also gobberish.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,888
    You could not possibly know if the 'present physics' are right or wrong since you know next to nothing about 'present physics.
    You are woefully ignorant of all aspects of science.
    Right, like I said ignorant of all aspects of science.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Seattle Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,857
    TC, please tell me that you live in a house or apartment rather than an institution or your parent's house.

    Do you go to work each day and interact with people? You don't have kids do you?
     
  8. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    I think I will just give up , it is not like I am talking to humans.

    One last try then stuff it.

    The 3 dimensions of space , x,y,z and the forth dimension being time is 3 dimensions of matter and time and not the other way around.

    x,y,z of space does not exist, x,y,z of matter travelling through space does exist. space is timeless and shapeless , x,y,z is projectile paths, matter has shapes, space does not,

    Yea I had enough of not getting anywhere ,

    bitch fit time.....

    try not to swear
    one last time,,
    IN SPACE TIME STANDS STILL
    IN SPACE THE ENTIRE VALUE OF THAT SPACE IS EQUAL TO ZERO.
    c=0
    f=0
    t=0
    m=0
    By combining matter and time into a single manifold called Theorist space, , time is treated as moving with an object, time being dependent of the state of motion of an observer or the object and dependent relative to gravitational fields for the object or observer
     

    Attached Files:

  9. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    The maths on the left is important , I know it looks odd to you, consider a race, and at the starting line the timer is ready, the race starts, 0.5 seconds before the rear of the vehicle starts over the start line, m1 x,y,z of space.
     
  10. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543

    One last time, or another hundred times, it does not matter how many times you repeat bunkum, it will not make it any more likely.
    That's why you have faced permanent bans elsewhere. Not for your ignorance, but for your back to the wall stubborness.
     
  11. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,888
    No you haven't, you will just start another silly pseudoscience thread.

    Even if you capitalize something that is false it will not magically become true.

    You do not understand matter, time or manifolds. Theorist space, that's precious.
     
  12. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    Having or showing dogged determination not to change one's attitude or position on something, especially in spite of good reasons to do so.

    you -earnestly advocate (a belief or course of action).

    Well if your bible of science was accurate, the discipline you keep trying to force on me, the preaching you do, the preaching that your stubborness allows you to accept in faith that it is all accurate and true, then perhaps I would not be so stubborn in accepting it.

    Ban him, ban him, burn him to the stake because he opposes us.

    Science and religion are entangled and science has an agreement with the church or something?


    Stop your preaching at me.........it will not wash...

    You have not showed any reason.........I have shown reason,
     
  13. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    Place an object on your hand, palm facing up, move the object with your hand, time moves with the object and your hand not the object move through a time.


    Got it now or are going to remain obtuse?

    Why you have ended up this problem, because originally time was based on movement of the Earth, time moved with the Earth and the Earth does not move through time, a misconception from history .

    P.s the idea does not effect any of your dimensional maths which is all scaled off the earths scale.
     
  14. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    Time is based on the earths spin speed

    A rocket ship orbits the clock, perpendicular to the second finger of the clock, travelling at 1 second per movement of the second finger.

    Do you get it now?
     

    Attached Files:

  15. Kristoffer Giant Hyrax Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,364
    If this is you being reasonable I don't ever want to see unreasonable.
     
  16. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    we in history defined time by relative velocity relative to matter relative to the Sun.
     
  17. Seattle Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,857
    Time flies with the swallow returning each year to Capestrano. The sky full of empty, transparent though it is, has no time or rather it has see though time or darkness time.

    The Earth turns about its axis in a non-counterclockwiseness once each day which is not a day but rather a day is it Clear as the beat of a Cesium clock telling time in a not telling manner or rather in an imitating light clock style of moving time.

    The eagle flies with the dove as with time perpendicular to the Earth less the gravity constant. The sound that is not there if there is no one there to hear it is not sound but rather sound is it not due to the no soundness of the forest minus the gravity constant and the constant of hear though silence which is really just here, similar to hair but not hare and certainly not hairy but possible Harry under certain unique circumstances which I'll get into later.

    What I'm trying to say is that the pot of gold (but really it's silver) is not at the end of the rainbow but rather the rainbow is terminated at the terminus of the bow of rain but has nothing to do with the dew point. The dew point isn't really a point but is more like an ever expanding arrow pulled toward (and not away from) the center of the Earth which is really the energy constant and the constant of ground effect not to be confused with effective translation lift.

    Ice is heavier than water and not lighter as science would have you believe. Ice does not float but water senses that ice is cold and pushes ice up as is determined by the push constant. It is still affected by sublimation and evaporation but not by winds (which is really just time) and the adiabatic rate certainly doesn't apply here. The constant of blowing does obviously.

    The retreating blade stalls due to precession and the Coriolis effect and this is why time flies not as a dove but as a sparrow.

    This is why the Seahawks will win the Superbowl and the Patriots will not.
     
  18. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    I do not know why I understand that post,I should see that has confused ramblings,I will have to read it a few times to clear some points but I am saying yes
     
  19. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,888
    No you have got it all wrong. Time is not based on the movement of the earth. Time exists with or with out the earth. We use the regular motion of the earth to define an increment of time. The regular movement of the earth was essentially our first 'ruler' to measure the passage of time. We now have much more accurate clocks to measure the passage of time. A meter stick is not length and a clock is not time. These are tools that are used to measure these dimensions.
     
  20. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    Disclaimer because of implications- Yes you are right I am wrong.
     
  21. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    I can't hide from this in fear of retribution , my idea of time is not even an idea, it is what we do, science just does not realise it is what they do.
    It does not interfere with the maths, it applies Armstrong axiom use of the maths.

    No you have got it all wrong. Time is not based on the movement of the Earth through a space time, time is the movement of the Earth. Time exists with or with out the Earth in space but has no value and does not start unless occupied by matter. We use the regular motion of the Earth to define an increment of time that matter occupies a space. The regular movement of the Earth was essentially our first 'ruler' to measure the passage of time. We now have much more accurate clocks to measure the passage of time that matter occupies a space, a device that uses an electronic transition frequency and the corresponding beats are equal to one second of motion of a surface point on Earth taken and made has close as possible to the original second based on motion.
     
    Last edited: Feb 1, 2015
  22. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    What you imagine, and your delusional state is of no concern to me.
    And your lies stick out like dog balls.
    All I ask is for evidence to support any of your concepts, that describe what we observe better than the incumbent model.
    I'm not Interested in your right to say what you like, which you seem to wear like a badge of honour, or the fact that all your stuff has been confined to the fringe sections, nor the fact that you have been permanently banned elsewhere.
    All those facts just show you up for what you are.
    A self indulgent, pretentious delusional individual.
     
  23. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    Again I ask you to prove it falsifiable, my evidence is exactly what it says, the maths is identical to your own maths, it is a Paradox.

    "falsifiable" does not mean it is false; rather, it means that if the statement were false, then its falsehood could be demonstrated.
     

Share This Page