Science thought, a journey back in time.

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by theorist-constant12345, Jan 30, 2015.

  1. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    Thank you I do know that from forums, a mistake I did use to think.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    A person replies ''so you are saying that time occupies space with a nothing value and only when we occupy that space does time accumulate and once the space is then unoccupied the value resets back to nothing and the nothing value space occupies the occupied space with a timed value at the same time''?

    I say '' Yes , I am saying exactly that ''.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    Back to the present for the moment to think about this I have just mentioned, and to discourse the present science involved, science is timing a period of the occupancy of matter in a dimension of space, relative to velocity is relative to the period of time a dimension of space is occupied.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,888
    The person then replies, "but I was just making up the goofiest, most meaningless gibberish, I could think of".
    To which you say, "exactly, and that is why i beleive it to be fact".
    Then everyone gets up, stands in the flames of the campfire and all begin singing My Favorite Things.
     
  8. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,888
    So if I understand you correctly, you are saying essentially nothing. Nothing more than a series of words that have no rational meaning.
     
  9. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    Not at all, if you are finding it hard to understand please ask what you do not understand at the camp fire, essentially science does not count time, science and everyone else quantify a period of existence in occupying a dimension of space and travelling from one dimension of space to the next dimension of space by motion.
    We exist in a space for the amount of time we occupy that space, once we leave that space the value of the space returns to zero.

    Analogy- Remove an object making a space, time that space by a standard clock or any other clock, you will find if you rationally think about it, although you are viewing that space, you are essentially timing yourself in a space and not timing the space you are viewing.
     
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2015
  10. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,888
    No thanks it seems a bit contrived and childish to me. Besides your post cannot be understood because they are nonsense.
    First of all you have shown you do not know anything at all about science.
    Secondly, the line, "travelling from one dimension of space to the next dimension of space", is more gibberish.
    This is yet another series of word strung together that have no meaning.
    An analogy - write a post that consists of every seventh word from a page in a science textbook and that will make the same amount of sense as your typical post.
     
  11. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    ''First of all you have shown you do not know anything at all about science.''

    Please go back to the first post and read it. You are not in this thread with a blank open mind using the fundamentals of science to produce science.

    Consider you are probably sitting down now, you occupy a space, you are though aware that you are in motion because you know the planet spins and orbits the Sun, you are moving relative with the Earth through space.
    If you stood up and walked across the room, you have left the dimension of space you spent a period of time in relative to the earth, but not relative to the continued displacement in space of orbiting bodies.
    From the moment you move from a static position relative to the earth, you are changing where you are in the dimensions of space, your speed away from your relative static position, is relative to the time you spend in a different dimension of space, relative to your starting dimension of space.
    Space is passive of matter and time, matter that is timed passes through space.
    A singularity existence in a now not void can only define time by timing their own existence in the void.
    Whilst you gaze at a body in motion, you are not timing the body in motion, you are timing your existence and motion relative to the bodies existence and motion travelling through space time changing in dimension's of space where it is positioned or was positioned relative to time spent in a singular point of dimensions .
     
  12. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    Ok, that's enough. TC is back on ignore.
     
  13. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,888
    You consistently show that you do not have any knowledge of science or even the ability to use reason or logic.
    This is one of those rare occasions where you have stated something correct. Congratulations.
    You evidently do not know what the definition of dimension or displacement is.
    Now the gibberish begins in earnist
    Nonsensical gibberish.
    Come on, you can't possibly be actually trying to make any sense with that mish-mash unrelated words. This has got to be you just joking
    I don't feel like trying to guess what this gibberish is suppose to mean. Maybe if you used small words that you understand you might be able to get your idea across. At this point I have no idea if there is even a coherent concept you are trying to explain.
     
  14. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    I really can not understand why you can not understand, I read a very coherent idea and thought .
    Dimension x,y,z, displacement- moving from one place to another.

    I know very well what I mean and know very well my logic is not flawed because I am not biased.

    I do not know how to make this any clearer,
     
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2015
  15. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    We return to the camp fire with thoughts on our minds about space and time and all of our existence, one of the people around the fire says;

    ''Why do we need to record this thing we will call time, what is the values that this will achieve?''

    I say , ''well I for one am self aware that around the camp fire of late, there is not many people, I checked on these people and they seem to have left us for the said heavens above, I myself personally would like to know how long I have got before I depart , can we prevent this from happening''.

    I speculate that time was invented to record how long we live and that once people were aware of death, the fear resulted in the invention of time with a means and intention to look for immortality.

    The Gods of Greece, the after life, time, all speculative thoughts looking to exist longer in hope, time was invented by the will to live.
    I would also base my assumption on the Egypian's interest in science and preservation of the Pharaoh's .
     
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2015
  16. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Time wasn't invented.
     
  17. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    Reworded - time keeping was invented by the will to live.
     
  18. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Whut?
     
  19. Seattle Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,849
    No one came up with the concept of time to countdown how long it would be until they (or the Pharaoh) died.

    Are you suggesting that numbers were also created to count down until one's death?

    Time is useful as is counting as is understanding the seasons for practical reasons such as planning or organizing the planting and cultivation of crops.

    This idea of time not existing unless a person is in a particular place and then when that person moves from that place there is no more "time" in that place is silly.

    You like to use the word "entropy"...things are always moving from the current state to a less ordered state. This doesn't stop just because you leave an empty room.

    You're being silly.

    You're also describing movement (which requires time) and not time itself. Try to speak (write) using words that you already knew before you started "learning" about science.

    When you use dimension, singularity, etc. you misuse them. Just sticking to words that you actually know the meaning of.
     
  20. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,888
    Here is an idea for you, if you are trying to say "moving from one place to another", why don't you try saying "moving from one place to another".

    I don't know if you are biased but your posts to this point have shown an almost complete lack of any coherent logic.

    I think that just maybe the idea you have is gibberish and so you naturally use gibberish to describe it.[/QUOTE]
     
  21. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    You say no one come up with the concept of time to count down life, see my reason in other post, you will find that the human will to survive , the wanting to know, will almost for sure be in the top flight of why did we bother to record time in the first place. All of history suggests by the discourse of the information and still apparent today, that it is Human nature to not want to die and in the nature of this created science and religion in the aim for a belief that immortality will be of the soul or the belief that there was a alixar of life.


    ''This idea of time not existing unless a person is in a particular place and then when that person moves from that place there is no more "time" in that place is silly.'''


    The truth is never silly , not time not existing unless a person is in a particular place but rather time not beginning until a particular space is occupied.

    Matter is time, matter in space is time and space, time filling space.


    method -
    1. place a linear object on a surface i.e pen
    2. mark two points one at each end of the objects length
    3. move the object so that the right side of the object is now to the left point leaving the distance to the right point empty of the object
    4.Every five seconds, move the object back and forth between the positions

    observe -
    You are focused on the time and the object, the object could be a clock and it would give you the same result of 5 seconds for each space.

    Consider that every time you have to perform the action and move the object , your count starts again from zero.

    Do you understand now what I am saying?
     
  22. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    No.

    Except that what you're positing is not the truth.

    No.

    No.

    Yeah, you're talking gibberish.
     
  23. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    Yes yes and yes, my time travel my logic, and better logic than history because we are smarter now than back then.
     

Share This Page