#10 1/22/2015 Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! This is a depiction of two big bang arenas that have expanded into each other, and in the shared overlap space their individual galaxies converge, coming under the influence of each other's gravity. (146)
I was going to complain about how litte of this was based on actual observation, and then I noticed that you had noticed the cold spot. Congratulations on being the first of the current crop of cosmologists even to acknowledge its existence, much less its significance. Do you not think it might resemble an insider's view of an accretion fountain?
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! From anywhere not within the overlap space, but within sphere R or sphere r, the cold spot would be observed to be in the direction of the overlap space. I haven't yet used the term "accretion fountain" in my model, and though it is somewhat descriptive of the action taking place to cause the cold spot, the explanation in my model is more of a migration of matter and energy toward the center of the overlap space, caused by gravity. The directions of the hemispherical asymmetry observed in the CMB, and the location of the cold spot, are caused by the same type of event, i.e. the intersection and overlap of two arenas. But the dipole asymmetry in the temperature gradient of the CMB in our arena was caused by such an event in the distant past, some say ~14 billion years ago, while the cold spot observed in our CMB has a much more recent origin, and corresponds to our Big Bang arena converging with a neighboring arena because they are expanding into each other's space. But I would like to have your description of an "accretion fountain". Perhaps it relates to bi-pole plasma jets, or what? Give me a link. (170)
"Plasma Jet" micht also work. I meant something like this: http://io9.com/5806997/black-hole-shoots-out-plasma-jets-that-are-even-bigger-than-its-galaxy It's a feature that one would think hard to miss, either from the inside or the outside of a black hole. Guess the other cosmologists are just too busy noodling about the unobservable parts of the big bang to notice something so obvious that was actually observed.
The WMAP and Planck data have presented the scientific community with a pivotal point in the history of cosmology. By all means, they are looking at all of the angles, and examining every theoretical explanation for the dipole, quadrupole and all wide angle anisotropies (>30º). If it can be explained within the constraints of existing theory, it is their responsibility to do all of the due diligence to explain it away, and then see what sticks. I have read a lot of the papers, and have seen the explanations, which to a layman like me seem to be "what ifs" upon "maybes" (very much like my speculations upon speculations, but done with scientific credentials, lol). In another thread, Farsight and I chatted about it, and he thinks the cold spot has been explained away, and accepts the explanation for the dipole anisotropy to be that our solar system is moving at ~627 km/s relative to the rest frame of the CMB. The problem is, that though it certainly does take that relative velocity to explain the hemispherical asymmetry, the explanation of what gravitational structure might be driving our motion keeps changing. Years ago it was attributed to the great attractor but that didn't prove out under closer examination. Right now, they do not claim to know the answer for sure, and the whole peculiar velocity, as the 627 km/s is named, does not have forces behind it that add up to anything near that velocity. I'm following a couple of discussions in other forums to keep my eye on developments. (186)
This Wiki on the cold spot touches on the various explanations: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CMB_cold_spot The Wiki mentions Laura Mersini-Houghton, and her prediction of the cold spot. I featured her work in my thread back in June, 2011. http://www.sciforums.com/threads/lorentz-invariance-and-the-multiverse-possible-or-not.108662/ I haven't followed her like I intended to though. I'll have to do some Googling to get up to date. (215)
#11 1/26/2015 Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! This image depicts the arena action from when two parent big bang arenas expand and overlap, and follows the gravitational collapse of the converging galactic material in the shared space until a big crunch froms, and then collapses/bangs into a new big bang arena. The arena action process is how entropy is defeated in my model. (223)
I have updated the YouTube video previously presented in Post #8, to include the slides that I have added since then. (247)
#12 1/28/2015 Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! In the ISU model, the CMB is coming into our arena from outside. The dipole anisotropy could be evidence of two or more parent arenas with slightly different ages, given that the age of each arena governs the extent of its expansion, and correspondingly, the level that their background temperatures have declined to. If each arena starts out at, for talking purposes, 50 million degrees K, and declines to about 2.7K, as ours has, after what is said to be ~14 billion years of expansion, a fraction of a degree hemispherical anisotropy might be explained by the temperature differences of the two or more parent arenas, which we could expected to be passed on to the new arena that forms when they converge. The temperature differences measured by WMAP and Planck in our arena, at the hemispherical level and the quadrupole level, would be attributed to the slightly different parent temperatures of the CMB that has come into our arena as it expands, or just as appropriately said, that has been traversing the space formerly occupied by those parent arenas, as our arena expands out into that space. In my model, given the greater universe, the corridors of space separating big bang arenas will have a background microwave signature from an infinite history of big bang "arena action" across the landscape of the greater universe. (261)
#13 1/28/2015 Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! This diagram depicts the big bang as a hot dense ball of energy that expands rapidly. In my model, that expansion represents one of the two major forces, energy density equalization. The highly dense hot energy ball expands into surrounding space that contains relatively low energy density, and that force driven expansion is imparted to particles as they form. (284)
#14 1/28/2015 Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! This image depicts the formation of particles as the hot dense energy ball expands. The result is that particles forming during that rapid expansion have separation momentum imparted to them. (286)
#15 1/28/2015 Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! The second major force in my model, gravity, is very strong in close quarters, which explains the clumping of particles to gas clouds and star/galaxy formation. This image depicts the premise that ultimately, separation momentum is stronger than gravity as the distances between objects increase within an arena. As the competing forces of energy density equalization and gravity play out, the rate of separation between galaxies and galaxy groups is observed to increase. (289)
#16 1/28/2015 Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Distant galaxies are observed to be moving away faster and faster, as indicated by the raw redshift data. (292)
#1 1/30/2015 Narrative This is the narrative and a new slide that will be added in front of the narrated version of the Vidra “explainer video” to be uploaded to YouTube. Begin: This is an overview of The Infinite Spongy Universe model of the cosmology of the universe, referred to as the ISU. The ISU model is divided into two major realms, one looking toward the Infinite, and the other looking toward the Infinitesimal. The most significant feature of this model is the striking sameness in the wave action mechanics taking place in the two realms. At the micro end, tiny quantum waves converge within the particle space to form momentary high density spots. The counterpart at the macro end is where two or more big bang arenas converge to form big crunches, which collapses and bang into new arenas. Each realm features its own energy quantum, and they are at opposite ends of the energy increment scale. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Graphic: Nature's range of meaningful energy increments The mechanics in both realms are referred to jointly as Quantum Wave Mechanics (QWC), and the respective quanta are orchestrated by very similar action processes at the opposite end of the scale. At the macro level, those quanta take the form of big crunches which accumulate an arena-quantum of energy; the energy required to spark the gravitational collapse of the crunch, and a resulting big bang. That is the action at the heart of Arena Action at the macro level. At the micro level, each particle is composed of quanta that accumulate at the overlap of internal quantum waves within the particle space. In this model, particles are complex standing wave patterns comprised of a huge number of such overlaps within the particle space. The standing waves have two major components, inflowing and out flowing gravitational wave energy. That is called Quantum Action at the micro level. In that sense, both realms are quantized, but each has its continuous wave action process that governs quantization. Matter is quantized and wave energy is continuous. In the nomenclature of the model, the universe features continuous foundational wave energy action that is quantized into high density big crunches that spawn big bang arenas in the macro realm, and that is quantized into internal high density spots within each particle space, that establish the presence of particles and enable quantum gravity in the micro realm. This video, Video #1, looks toward the Infinite, and addresses the macro realm of the ISU model. It features our Big Bang, its preconditions, and the arena of space it occupies as it expands. It describes the multiple arena landscape of the greater universe where big crunches form, collapse, and bang as the process called Arena Action takes place there. This is the perpetual process that is playing out across the potentially infinite landscape of the greater universe. The key result of Arena Action is the defeat of entropy on a grand scale. High entropy parent arenas converge, allowing new low entropy arenas to emerge that fill with galaxies as they mature, and whose stars host hospitable planets on which the generation and evolution of life naturally occurs. Life is prevalent throughout the billions of galaxies that form in each maturing arena, that compose the infinite arena landscape the greater universe. Video #2 looks toward the infinitesimal, and addresses the micro realm of the ISU model. It features quantum action, which is the mechanics of quantum particles, quantum gravity, and a hidden variables interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Let’s look at ... The Infinite Spongy Universe (321)
My friend who suggested I do images disowns me :shrug:. My wife gets annoyed if I say anything about the model. The long time members who sometimes posted cryptic discouraging comments have gotten bored. That's progress for someone who posts in the fringe, lol. (362)
How did I fail to respond to this? It isn't a complete blog. Actually so far this year, three people, including you, have posted comments here; two of them on-topic, unlike your useless comment. I can't help it if no one is into amateur cosmology in the way I am. I don't expect anyone to participate, but I do like to post my thinking, in the form of a hobby-model, and with the steps I take to develop it. As I recall, you tired and failed to show where my model was wrong in the past. Sure, it is wrong if you maintain that the consensus cosmology, Big Bang Theory is right, to the extent of being reality, and that quantum mechanics is complete; but no one really steps up and says that, now do they. Just the opposite; most members acknowledge that there is work to be done before we understand the universe, and I say that hypothesizing is a perfectly legitimate outlet for layman science enthusiasts to discuss it, especially in a Alternative Theories sub-forum. You and others have gotten your britches in a swivet over how audacious it is for me to say that my model is internally consistent, and not inconsistent with scientific observations and data. You are not he only one who has failed to prove me wrong about that. CptBork even reported my twice over his unfounded accusations, hoping to get "the likes of" me banned. So say what you want, you have nothing that proves me wrong, and your past attacks have seemed more like personal animosity toward me for dealing in areas that are not falsifiable; duh, that is name of the game in "alternative" ideas where the evidence is exactly the same for everyone. My model is built using a reasonable and responsible methodology of speculation and hypothesis, connected to and derived from scientific observations, and the known mechanics behind them. Each step has been presented, and held open for discussion over the years, and all comments and corrections are evaluated, remediated, and appreciated. (386)
Earlier this evening I had a bad time uploading my narrated ISU video to YouTube. I tried it twice, each upload took more than an hour, and when I succeeded and was given a YouTube link, the link then said that the video had been deleted because it was too long. It was about 20 minutes, and I know there are many videos longer than that. Note: I think I found out the problem, and will try it again.
Yes, I finally got the narrated version loaded, and thought I would start a new thread for it: My Narrated ISU YouTube - Macro Overview
I may have kind of worn out my welcome here over the years by sticking with my hobby, trying to follow the posting rules, and not responding to off topic remarks, for the most part. It makes for a boring thread, but I justify sticking with it because over many years here, I have had hundreds of discussions that have added to the content of my model. Though I post on several other forums, and actually have on-topic discussions elsewhere, this one has been sort of my home base, the place where my threads are archived, and where I am pretty much left to my own study and hypothesizing. My recent YouTube video would have brought an avalanche of grief down on me in past years, and now it is just more of the same nothingness, the SciForums black hole, lol.
