A new way to record the passage of time by use of the Universal Constant.

I will mention curvature displacement by distance and time being relative to distance travelled in time.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Incredible, simply incredible.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

This is such a waste of time, you do not even have a grasp on concepts that are taught in 6th grade. If believing that you have some knowledge that no one else does brings you happiness then more power to you.

Enjoy.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

It does not really matter about shapes or angles , you can not deny the constant of light that all your experiments are within. A constant that your experiments have no effect on.

 

I am putting you on ignore (you should be proud you are only the second person I have ever put on ignore!) and hope you go away. I would suggest that you go back to school.

Bye.

 

Your choice , no problem.

 

He and his thread, has only one place to go to from here, and it aint up!
Cesspool here I come!
Only one other in my time here, has come anywhere near to posting such stupidity, my old mate chinglu!

 

Don't forget Victor! I liked his space shuttle that grew trees for fuel.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Damn!! yes, I had forgotten Victor...Poor old soul.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

I combined my diagrams to show this.

 

I have tried to add some maths to my idea. In this example I do get a time dilation of 0.1 seconds, I believe this is due to the change in velocity of z or my maths is off.

 

Didnt his spaceship run on "the smell of victor"?

 

I may have to agree that a time dilation exists and stand down from my idea, on 3 clocks I get the exact length of time, on z clock I get 0.1 second time dilation, and although I think I know why this is, I do not think it will be accepted has the reason.

 

Diameter of a circle = 299792458 meters


V=c
1 diameter is equal to 1 second,

Place a square around the circle , and for the angular from corner to corner of the square , V=c, I get 1.4 seconds, is that correct?

I need to confirm my maths before I drop the idea thanks.

 

MOD's - request to cesspool this thread, I have learnt the maths for time dilation, it might not be the same way, but I have obtained the same results.

My idea is flawed.

I get a time dilation in my model of
0.74264068711.s


However in light of this, I do have an advancement on the Einstein famous thought experiment, that shows the content in a simpler form, and I will present this idea to you in the near future.

 

Did you report your thread with a request to cesspool it? Because I don't think just writing 'MODS' will attract their attention.

Btw, congrats on realizing your idea was flawed. Only took 6 pages in this case. Maybe you should consider doing the same in the case of your 40+ page thread on light and dark.

 

I am not giving up the other thread just yet, I do have a great new explanation to show time dilation that is far easier to understand than the Einstein thought i think, but yes this thread is flawed and at this time I am unable to explain it although I do have an assumption it is not strong enough to persist in it.

 

Did you report your thread with a request to cesspool it?

If no, I'll do it for you.

ETA: Reported it for you.

 

Yes i reported myself thanks

 

OMG, I told you close the thread and now I know why you have a time dilation and can prove it is 2 dimensional thinking.

If you view the Einstein light thought experiment and change your observation perspective view to above the experiment, the linear is equal to angular distance and there is no dilation. It is about the observers perspective.