Bay of Bengal Holocaust

I am from India. Caste system and similar systems have existed and exist today. People are categories into middle class, lower class etc. Let me tell you a fact, I am one of those "lower" caste Indians.
I have read his blogs and they helped me to clarify the issues the doubts I had. The Vedas which mention cruelty had been written by British historians like Lord Macualay, Max muller.
For example People in India had been divided by the hijacked caste system theory that these historians presented to Indians, Indians Sikhs are demanding a different country because they have been fooled that their Gurus (Saints ) were against Hinduism but in reality Sikh Gurus fought for the country. http://sanatansikhi.blogspot.in/2011/04/sikhs-stop-brahmin-bashing.html
The huge number of caste existence is cause by British and their financier company. Originally India had Ghotra system and it was created because Indians already knew that Y chromosome was deteriorating, thats why Indians had strict arranged marriages ( never against wishes of girls and boys). Indian society was not of pedarstic like that was of Greece, Sparta. After the Mughal invasion of india women were forced to remain inside houses as their was always danger of mughals soldiers kidnapping girls. The Mughals were staunch anti - Sanatan Dharma.
The Ghotras were broken down to make thousands of castes. Remember I am not anti-white.

And about millions people dying, I have written that Indians who sucked to British Government were also responsible. The Indians Government had no power other than sucking to British no matter what they kept on publishing in newspaper for the struggle of freedom and Gandhi always denounced any aggressive struggle by Indian youths. Gandhi didn't allow Subhash Chandra Bose to become president of Indian Congress as he was nationalist, later Subhash Chandra Bose formed INA to free country and Bengalis were first to give their support ( Burma is near Bengal ). Therefore Bengal was intentionally starved.
If wealthy families had hoarded food, the million people could have attacked them and taken all food. Here you should use your brain, who gave protection to these wealthy families ? Why would British allow hoarding of food ?
I am sure they didn't send food to space so that it couldn't be found, isn't it.

About history. Let me tell you dear We Indians were most advanced civilization, but Vatican doesn't want anything older than 6000 years , your fellow science men to know. Indians are first to worship Stones that have connection
with our formation of DNA : http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2011/08/nasa-dna-building-blocks-in-meteorite.html
To name few inventions :

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

“ Honest, guys East India company never stole Kerala Calculus and gave it to Newton. Isaac Newton is the old father of Calculus and I David Bressoud who is the modern father of Calculus and an expert having spontaneous knowledge , solemnly vouch for this !”.
Indians already knew the Earth is round. Indians were first to know Fibonacci series, atoms, zero.
We Indians are Aryans, the Swastika symbol and Star of " David" is also of Indian origin.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

We Indians have sidereal astrology and to get right readings precision of equinoxes knowledge is must.
What Captain is writing is true and you don't have any ground to prove him wrong. He is a engineer and has read quantum physics.
He has sailed the world and he has friends of all the colors and he targets governments only.
Without reading his blogs don't be against him.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Seriously , the symbols used thousands of years ago by europeans, for fertility, good joke. Read the science behind the symbols, then comment.These specials symbols have lots to do with space and universe and not too much with some fertility.
Question yourself why their is strong links with Sanskrit and euorpean languages, similarity between Mayan civilization and Indian civilization.
Show me any civilization which has advanced concepts of cosmos, trinity of gods other than India. The greatest physicsts agree as they know the science behind.
Captain had predicted that sacred black meteor Shiva Lingam has something to do with DNA, after two years of prediction even NASA has said that DNA can be built in space. Muslims love that stone and guard, yet they say they are anti-idols. Captain is not an anti-semite, he has jewish freinds, I have read his blogs and haven't become any anti-semite. He is not a comedian who will entertain you.
You ask me to read books, almost all these books are written by foreign agents like Lord Maculay. These same books claimed Indians hated women, killed cows, Lord Shiva was a mortal, etc. Lots of Indian history is subverted.

And about Bay of Bengal deaths, you should think over it.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Millions of people die all the time and people "deny" it... over six million people of Jewish faith (and others) were killed during the WWII Holocaust, yet people still try to deny that it happened.

The fact that you link to a facebook page as "evidence" says it quite clearly - you have no factual evidence to support this insane theory.

EDIT - as for that blog you keep linking, knock it off - it has passed the point at which it is spam, and is verging on advertisement. Consider this a written warning regarding that blog...

 

" And once again, this babbling of yours about "captain" has nothing to do with the Bengal famine of 1943.
I notice in your profile in your blog you keep spamming that you claim to want to rewrite history. Rewriting it by ignoring historic fact to suit your own political agenda is not going to work. And frankly, having just googled your name, I am absolutely disgusted and it appears, I am not the only one disgusted. Of course you defend the caste system. You are a part of it. You use that blog of yours to defame people and to post absolute crap and lies. Is this what you call rewriting history? I call bull. " I started because you doubted history written by him. though i won't write about it now.

"I think the travesty is that you claim to be from India, but you are so woefully uneducated about your own country's history, so much so that you actually believe the words of a hack online who is spouting conspiracy theories and absolute lies."
may be I am wrong. Oh, answer them please :
If wealthy families had hoarded food, the million people could have attacked them and taken all food. Here you should use your brain, who gave protection to these wealthy families ? Why would British allow hoarding of food ?
I am sure they didn't send food to space so that it couldn't be found, isn't it ?

 

holocaust is fact too, but Nazi's are made demons always thats why they refute holocaust. Nazi's were far nicer than allies.
Oh, answer them please :
If wealthy families had hoarded food, the million people could have attacked them and taken all food. Here you should use your brain, who gave protection to these wealthy families ? Why would British allow hoarding of food ?
I am sure they didn't send food to space so that it couldn't be found, isn't it ?

 

So because you cannot provide any factual evidence, you invoke the Reductio ad absurdum fallacy... that doesn't do much to strengthen your position (and in fact, makes it even weaker than it already was)

 

Funny, isn't it ? You too cannot provide factual evidence that British tried to save people.
You, as proof, need written beautifully on paper " KILL ALL THE BENALI's or STARVE ALL BENGALI'S "
Or The other way,
Why would sweet, good British government do this too the people ? or British government loved Bengalis as their own brethern, how could they let them die ?
or
Why beautiful, Mighty, World Ruler British government couldn't provide free meals to Bengalis ?

 

Show me anywhere where I have claimed the British tried to save the people. I have made no such claim.

I rather like the simple facts of the matter:

Cited from WinstonChurchill.org

Additionally:

So, tell me - where did Britain fail in this matter, hm? The fact that they sent any aid whatsoever despite already being embroiled in a little thing known as the Second World War shows that they did, in fact, attempt to help.

In the words of Jack Nicholson... “Sell crazy someplace else. We’re all stocked up here.”

 

So nice that you didn't answer my question
How to could not sweet British government didn't help Bengali ? The British could fight world wars but not wealthy rich families ? Good logic.
Lets say that your logic is right, then it itself becomes evident that people died and good british government did nothing.
If at other places food was hoarded people should have died their too, it is funny people don't die in masses their.

As, I write, Bengali's pledgded their support to INA, and scared british government wanted them to die. The British had strong hold in India till Independence, it was only because of aggressive mutiny by Navy sailors that drove british away but very few Indians know about it.
About Nazi's, they were nicer they just killed people, aleast most of them had manners that they gave decent death.

 

Thank You very much, Thanks , Thanks.
You have acknowledged my difference from you.
You mention that old pervert, google him, may be then your illusions fade away.
The claim you say about, (I am sorry about it ) , no matter you said or not it will evidently fall to two options.
a. british starved intentionally starved people, so that INA could not enter India..
b. british did nothing for staving people as it was all the " fault " of indians.

 

Good you have conscience.
I mean Nazi's, killed people in gas chambers, simple death to almost all of them , but you should check out what people like pope, Ante Pavelic have done.
I shouldn't do maths on people's feelings and dead, I accept I am wrong here.
But still, arguing that you need proof of Bengal holocaust, this is one of the minor holocaust I have just revived to attention. Some day I will write about much bigger.
The matter of proof, I have already written, read them with open brain.

 

A brief anecdote to make the point:

• My brother is greatly respected among his friends for an appearance of wisdom, and there is no question the guy is smart, but no, his wisdom on those occasions is often just a well-played comedy routine mocking the masses. You would think, for instance, that he would not be the first to note the difference between public opinion and actual quality, yet you would also think, to watch people's reaction, that they had never paused to consider that while "public opinion" might say this or that, it also made Spice Girls a #1 act.

So people think he's wise. And like many smart humans, he has his moments, and more than the average idiot in society.

As a result, his blunders can have every appearance of being epic failures of his much-vaunted intelligence.

I remember the rise of the internet, being puzzled by the hugeness of the public freakout. It is also one of my brother's great flaming disasters of wisdom.

In the U.S., for instance, it had gotten to the point that members of immediate families were communicating more via telephone than direct conversation. "The internet," my brother predicted, "is going to bring a new Age of Letters. People are going to stop calling each other and start writing letters again." It was a hopeful sentiment, one you might expect from someone whose closet protects not any kinky sex secret, but, rather, just how much he adores Coleridge and Byron, and how much their work shapes his outlook. You might as well try to steal his nutsack, it's that protected.

But, yes, with everyone at the time expecting me to write professionally, it seemed an obvious argument, and not without merit. The potential for a new Age of Letters was almost immeasurable.

But this outlook did not account for SMS or mental illness. It did not account for the low quality of public opinion. Rather than a new Golden Age, what we got was an Age of Letters in which any semi-literate fool with an internet connection could pretend Jeremiah. As his wisdom goes, that failure of foresight does, in fact, humiliate my brother, since it is the sort of thing even he believes he should have seen coming.

There is a reason why, looking at this website you keep pushing, I recall that period so directly.

I would like you to imagine for a moment that you are pushing a real, substantial, and important issue. It is easy enough for us to imagine that you already think you are. But that's the thing; the web page you keep referring people to looks and reads just like the paranoid tinfoil soapboxes.

These days, the successful prophets of paranoia have at least figured out to make their websites look like others. Take World Net Daily, for instance; get rid of the bad layout, write complete sentences with reasonable spelling, and add a store to hawk paranoia bound to book form, and suddenly there is a sector of society that will pretend they're a real news organization. And that's just aesthetics; imagine how much more they could accomplish if their actual produce was more than badly-written speculative fiction.

But they're putting on a more accessible show than you are, which is part of the reason they are successful.​

Sadly, the sins of colonialism are a very important issue that doesn't get enough attention in modern society; even the colonizing powers still suffer the echoes of that time.

But this isn't the way to go about it. And by the time you get around to gaffing the Nazis, I can only tell you that you are wrecking the chances that anyone would take you seriously.

 

In other words, you have no intention of using or even acknowledging real facts, and will instead continue to peddle your dribble so long as you can...

Consider this farce over; you have made a mockery of yourself and of historical fact.