GOD trolls in science forums.

God is a troll?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

to put away god is unscientific and dangerous.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Incorrect.
"God" is, in and of itself, an unscientific concept.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

so how life will go on ?

 

well to me a person who consider himself atheist does not value life. i will explain :
we are all made of up of matter, every atheists knows this.
according to atheists life is nothing but chemical reaction, based on certain formulas.
so why why not kill all, kill yourself. since body will disintegerate into same matter.
why atheists just keep on living, why they don't try death ?
why don't kill parents ? what stops you ? if you say law, then check out why a law is made.
again what if other atheist kills you ? why atheists form groups ? how they find similarity ? how they trust each other ? how they know they pursue same goal ?
to know a person is with you is not a thing of fact but of heart. the day atheists declare god dead, they declare themselves hopeless, who have no hope, though this life may progress, yet they have already set their beliefs.
the day atheists declare he is atheist he is following his dear no god.
my views can be negated by claimingy evolutionary advantage of 'love' and 'friendship'. but do value others with your 'love and frienship'.
one thing more, can your 'science' define your feelings, can your 'science' define i am reading your words. that me in flesh is witnessing you.
theists too have done wrong but they still have little hope.
what atheist would do when their dear one is in trouble, wont they help in any way, since the person is dear.
i am not to convert here anyone, but still if they cannot pray for their dear ones, then the dear person were never their friend.
i don't believe in any god, but i pray for my beloved ones, i go to the point of irrationality.
this deep care is the god. you too know their is no Abrahmic god. why again and again write about him.
the top minds of physics were religious without religion.

 

thing is that the originator of thread had belief that all who sinf of god are trolls, that god is not science.
our very existence, our journey continues because of god.
this god i talk about is infinte, you too search her (the cosmic sexy lady ) in the form of no God. their is deep love for him, that you cannot resist her.
troll means a person who talks about other than the present topic.
aren't we all trolls in this existence, who are engaged in mindless love, we don't die and disintegerate.

 

Interesting that you say that, yet science plays god, experiments consisting of trying to make new particles. God is defined has a creator, humanity tries to mimic every process that is said was godly created.
''1 In the beginningA)" data-cr="#cen-NIV-1A" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0.625em; line-height: 22px; position: relative; vertical-align: top; top: 0px;"> God createdB)" data-cr="#cen-NIV-1B" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0.625em; line-height: 22px; position: relative; vertical-align: top; top: 0px;"> the heavensC)" data-cr="#cen-NIV-1C" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0.625em; line-height: 22px; position: relative; vertical-align: top; top: 0px;"> and the earth.D)" data-cr="#cen-NIV-1D" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0.625em; line-height: 22px; position: relative; vertical-align: top; top: 0px;"> 2 Now the earth was formlessE)" data-cr="#cen-NIV-2E" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0.625em; line-height: 22px; position: relative; vertical-align: top; top: 0px;"> and empty,F)" data-cr="#cen-NIV-2F" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0.625em; line-height: 22px; position: relative; vertical-align: top; top: 0px;"> darkness was over the surface of the deep,G)" data-cr="#cen-NIV-2G" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0.625em; line-height: 22px; position: relative; vertical-align: top; top: 0px;"> and the Spirit of GodH)" data-cr="#cen-NIV-2H" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0.625em; line-height: 22px; position: relative; vertical-align: top; top: 0px;"> was hoveringI)" data-cr="#cen-NIV-2I" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0.625em; line-height: 22px; position: relative; vertical-align: top; top: 0px;"> over the waters.

3 And God said,J)" data-cr="#cen-NIV-3J" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0.625em; line-height: 22px; position: relative; vertical-align: top; top: 0px;"> “Let there be light,” and there was light.K)" data-cr="#cen-NIV-3K" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0.625em; line-height: 22px; position: relative; vertical-align: top; top: 0px;"> 4 God saw that the light was good,L)" data-cr="#cen-NIV-4L" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0.625em; line-height: 22px; position: relative; vertical-align: top; top: 0px;"> and he separated the light from the darkness.M)" data-cr="#cen-NIV-4M" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0.625em; line-height: 22px; position: relative; vertical-align: top; top: 0px;"> 5 God calledN)" data-cr="#cen-NIV-5N" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0.625em; line-height: 22px; position: relative; vertical-align: top; top: 0px;">the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.”O)" data-cr="#cen-NIV-5O" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0.625em; line-height: 22px; position: relative; vertical-align: top; top: 0px;"> And there was evening, and there was morningP)" data-cr="#cen-NIV-5P" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 0.625em; line-height: 22px; position: relative; vertical-align: top; top: 0px;">—the first day.''

Interesting that science followed the bible, accepted light at face value, and passed dark off has just the absence of light.
God did not say let there be light, Physically impossible, God could of said , ''let there be a Photon-Photon chain, that will fill the dark with dangerous radiation''.

And there was evening and there was morning, somehow I do not think God was much of a science type, or he would of said, ''there is daylight, and then there is the blocking of the light''.

the light “day,” technically incorrect, day is only perceived because of rotation, if all mass was transparent, then there would be no ''night''.

It is not light day, or what science calls day light, it is actually like the bible told you, it is dark-light, the light is emitted into the darkness to make illumination.

The opening chapter of the bible, and I found several pieces of content that relate to science, interesting, I wonder how much more I could find if I continued to read this book.


Is the bible technically a science book?

Either way , my intentions by saying god trolls, is that they believe in God and will at their best try to ruin science and threads.

 

That's merely a claim, and metaphorical at that.

Nope.

No it didn't. Science investigated light - it accepted nothing at "face value".

No.

Because god, in all likelihood, doesn't exist.

Your version is a "physically impossible" as the simpler claim.

So what?

This is, at best, meaningless drivel.

It depends on how much eisegesis you're willing to accept.
(I.e. how much YOU want to believe it is science, as opposed to how much it IS science).

It's not even close to being a science book.

In which case you're misassigning the epithet.
The majority (if not all) of those you have, so far, accused of being "god trolls" don't believe in god.

 

That does sound quite scientific.

 

That cat is ill.

 

Yes there are "god trolls" posting in science threads. i.e. posters who have a drive to make you believe in their version of religious faith. Science can not prove that their god does not exist (or the non-existence of any thing outside of a closed tautology like mathematics.) Too bad so few of them acknowledge that they cannot prove their version of god does exist either.

Most of them don't even realize that they have to also prove that the other version of god or religious belief are wrong. E. g. those who believe there is no Heaven or hell, just an endless chain of re-incarnations, etc.

 

the childish things.
why wasting precious time here if god does not exist ?

 

the atheist are believers like all. they just exclude god.

 

In other words they're not believers.

 

tAtheists believe and that's why they go against spirit of atheism.
theists say everything is of god.
still atheists believe in lots of things, phenomena other than god.
this Atheism is self imposed illusion, same is case of Theism.

 

Given that atheism refers ONLY (as you have been previously informed) to a lack of belief in god(s) then atheists do NOT "go against the spirit of atheism".
Whatever an atheist believes OTHER than god(s0 does not affect, or even impinge on, their atheism.
(And, please, list some things - "phenomena other than god" - that atheists believe in).
What you're doing here is essentially claiming that cricket fans are also, by definition, football fans because liking one sport implies an automatic liking for all sports.

Yeah, you're back this nonsensical claim of yours that you personally are neither an atheist nor a theist.

 

they go against their own atheism, the day they conclude the invisible sky god does not exist, they have become theists of no god.
happiness, sadness, madness.
thank you i am nonsense, you have acknowleged me , different from theists and atheists.
it is nice to be appreciated by a person from far way country.

many say atoms exist but we see their effect only, isn't it.
love, suffering are things other than chemical reactions, which are felt not proved isn't it similarly theists say god has effect, god exist.

 

As explained, no they don't.

No.

By definition you can't be a "theist of no god".

What?

Not really.

Absolute crap.

 

this crap, nonsense are your feelings. your are responsible for them, cause you believe me.
god means their is more in life than mere chemical reactions. do you realize you are trying to prove your point cause you want to . this desire is belief.
atheists can only be agnostic only, the day a person concludes, he becomes a believer.
i was believer as well as non-believer. Now i am both and not both.

 

well bye man see you tommorow
good night

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!