What's the problem?

Discussion in 'Site Feedback' started by adhams, Dec 21, 2014.

  1. adhams Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    331

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Ppl here are too aggressive in fact some ppl here are impolite
    Except for some I know
    In fact I have seen ppl on TOE quest and they are very polite
    With unique kindness and in fact they are the nerds I expected to see in a scientific community I lost faith in humans they all seem to be ba****ds or somewhat annoying anyhow I like some ppl here

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,549
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. adhams Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    331

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Sorry iam sure that I somewhat exaggerated ppl here seem to know what is right apart from me but still ppl here are angry mobs lol
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. adhams Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    331
    Sorry Iam sure that I somewhat exaggerated but any how dieeeeee lol

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  8. Russ_Watters Not a Trump supporter... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,051
    In your life in general, you will find that people will treat you better if you act better. That's an important life skill you need to learn.
     
  9. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    You have to expect an opposing argument, I do however agree that there is not opposing arguments from some members and only abuse that is uncalled for.
    These people want to get a grip, it is only talk about topics, a topic on a science forum has no means to change science, it is only scientific papers, models etc that can change anything, forums are talk related about ideas, and my opinion is for every scientist , they should have a creationist by their side, then we have good science.
     
  10. sculptor Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,476
    There are a lot of worse mental illnesses than being belligerent on-line.
     
  11. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Then your opinion is worthless.
    Creationists don't do science. AT ALL, let alone contribute to good science.
    This is like claiming car mechanics would benefit from having a mime work with them, or that computer programmers would write better code with the aid of a top-class gardener.
     
  12. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    So wrong, you can have all the knowledge in the world, and if you are clueless to think for yourself it is pointless. Knowledge is memory mimicked from the past, and in know way does this make a person clever or says the person has the ability to think.

    This is why people like yourself, and no disrespect intended, can not think up an alternative idea with any sort of merit.

    You have to have memorisers, and thinkers to achieve one set goal.

    I can think and I have also learnt science, I would love to see you write an alternative but I know you have not got the gums, to even try to attack science, you are indeed a follower and not a scientist.
     
  13. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    No it's not.

    Bullshit again.

    Not very well.

    You demonstrate that you haven't, with practically every post you make.

    What makes you think we need an "alternative"?

    Wrong again.

    I not that you haven't - in any way - provided any support for your contention that a creationist would aid a scientist.
    All you've done is A) attack me ( with already-dealt-with falsehoods) and B) made assertions that have already been shown to be incorrect.
     
  14. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    You do not even discuss science all you do most of the days is say YOU ARE WRONG, according to who? Oh, I know the God of the duck, you think you are some sort of know it all, but without participation, the forum awaits your alternative theory , so put up or shut up, lets us see how smart you think you are, I await your alternative idea.
     
  15. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    According to SCIENCE.
    You know, the science that you claim (incorrectly) to be familiar with.

    Again: what makes you think we need an alternative theory?

    And... still waiting for your "justification" that a creationist would help produce "good science".
     
  16. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    At least your wording is better with no insults.

    Science says it, and of cause science can not be wrong can it?

    Everything can be wrong.
    Justification is a top cat, justification is that creationists minds are often not filled with the already known, creationists can think up a storm but need a Maxwell.
    The two go together like bread and butter.

    You really forget that I came to science knowing relatively very little about science. I studied some aspects of science, and in studying, and not being a clueless moron, I spotted what I deem to be several errors of logic. However unlike yourself, I have not by education had the forced discipline of automatic acceptance of what I have learnt.

    I know shit loads dude, so please stop thinking I have not learnt anything.
    I know something about every topic in science, please feel free to test me, I can give present answers and sound like a stuck record to, and I understand why you are the way you are, probably years of ground hog day explaining which must become tiresome.
     
  17. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    No one has said that.

    Correct.
    Creationists' minds aren't filled with the "already known" they're filled with an unjustified belief and will lie, cheat and twist facts to suit that belief.

    And you still know very little.

    That's because A) what you call logic isn't actually logic and B) you haven't actually learned anything.

    Isn't it strange how those without an education persist in claiming that obtaining an education is somehow a "forced acceptance"?

    You show with most posts that you haven't learned anything.

    Right.
    This from the guy who doesn't know what "centripetal" means, what "implode" means, claims there's no such thing a time dilation, doesn't understand the Cavendish experiment, doesn't know that stronger gravity increases time dilation... etc. etc.
     

Share This Page