Albert said that there is a curvature in space time but is he wrong? Let's see what he says He says that this curvature leads to gravity so it's not a bend in time space that does nothing to particles as he says if it was the particle would actually go thro the bent space without any effect Now what he said is that this bent space causes gravity which means that the particle slides down thro it now if u see this even without friction which is little in fact due to this good material u would see that gravity leads to absorption of the particle which isn't what happens in reality now even now it's still not explained how this happens The guy look like a moron simply coz the particle fails to orbit without it being absorbed as what happens when earth orbits the sun
You clearly have no understanding of General Relativity at all, so you look like a fool trying to dispute it. You really need to give it a rest.
There is no theory that says that. If you are asking about the general theory of relativity and the warping of space then you should look at this. This
Then what does it say? Could u pls explain? I have no ability to read and comprehend all that If u kindly tell me how does it work? Why scientists credit it? Iam sure it would be much easier to explain the juice it would take less writing I saved the page tho
If you cannot understand the link I provided, I am afraid I cannot help you. I do not know how to make it any easier to understand.
So it's complicated lol I will decrease its complexity how could the particle go and spin around and follow the natural course of movement thro space?
Wait u didn't even explain iam sorry Ok here is a deal if I understand Alberts theory and couldn't disprove it I wouldn't write about the theory of mine at all would u pls answer the last question?Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
I will try one time. A photon or light wave moves in a straight line through space. Near a massive body like the sun space is curved. So the photon follows a straight path through the space near the sun. For a distant observer it would look like the photon was moving in a curve because space is curved. If you are in that curved space near the sun it would not seemed curved to you and you would say that the photon was moving in a straight line.
Now the thing is if u get a piece of paper a pen and drew straight lines along the paper and then draw the sun and put ur finger above it in the mid of the paper then get a piece of pebble and move it along the straight lines u would see that the pebble would get out of the suns curvature of course the lines are not straight at the curvature but they are intact even after the curvature
First does ligh move according to straight lines that u see in vids? What I see from those vids that it doesn't how does light follow the closest path thro space? I cannot comprehend whether the closest path thro space when curved is the circle or the straight line that it follows already and which one it would follow
I understand what I read till now but if u think of it the object that suffers gravity shouldn't follow a circular line at all in fact any line that enter the curvature is still straight and particles should move thro with circulation Now I understand
But there is that tiny teeny question why do they in the vids make the space out of straight lines not circles around the sun for example?
Why do particles go around the edge of the curvature? Why don't they enter more into the curvature ? I have read about Alberts Theory and it seems very successful the most one known to be so
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!What is the relation of particles momentum and mass to that? What does it mean that the particle follow the normal path for it when it enters the stupid curvaturePlease Register or Log in to view the hidden image! What is the path defined by? I mean what constricts a particles path