Gravity question.

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by theorist-constant12345, Nov 17, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. OnlyMe Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,914
    My point!

    In post 39 I tried to take two questions presented, as honest, and gave as simplified as an answer as possible. True we both know, (you and I), that the way I present some of these concepts, is not always consistent with how even other knowledgable members would like or agree with.., still there was and has been no response to that post. There has been no math or credible references, both (or at least one of the two) I think required by the rules.., yes? Phrasing opinion as veiled questions should not an acceptable means to post nonsense in a science section of the forum... That is mostly about what apears to be the Threads intent. The Thread itself has degraded to something even further from a discussion of anything that could be considered appropriate for the Physics & Math forum, but that is an assessment of the thread discussion as a whole rather than the content or non-content of one or a few posts.

    I don't know what the new forum Moderator tools look like, but this thread does not belong in the Physics & Math forum and it should not require near 100 posts for that to become clear. Even if the historical information is not yet available, you should know that I don't use the Report function often. Likely fewer than a handful of times, in total...

    This thread does not merit a place in the Physics & Math forum and should be moved to somewhere on the fringe or ....
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. OnlyMe Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,914
    Your question(s) have been answered and seem to have been ignored repeatedly, earlier in the thread. In post 39 I tried to dumb down an answer as far as possible.., you seem to have ignored all attempts to answer, any of your versions of what now seem to be dishonest questions.

    Most of your above quoted post has nothing to do with the discussion. Your last line is pure nonsense and misdirection, attempting to divert to yet another bit of nonsense... BTW since the concept of North is one based on convention and an Earth centered frame of reference, it could be extended as far into the universe as one wishes.., which does within that context extend the concept of North, as a direction, to the universe as a whole. So from the frame of reference where the direction North originates.., the universe does have a definate North.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,426
    Moderator note: This thread is full of nonsense and no useful progress is being made. Closed.
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page