Misogyny, Guns, Rape and Culture..

Discussion in 'Ethics, Morality, & Justice' started by Bells, Jun 2, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Trooper Secular Sanity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,784
    Your move, Tiassa.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. tali89 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    343
    So now you know what gender I (supposedly) am, and what society I live in, despite me having never given any indication of either. You've just lost all of your credibility by shooting off unsupported assumptions. Then again, how much did you have to begin with, when you are quite happy to place women at increased danger of rape while you cling to your idealogue?
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    tali89, make an actual, rational, fact-supported argument, or get the hell out of this thread
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Trooper Secular Sanity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,784
    Ditto, Kitt.
     
  8. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    You, Trooper, have no room to even attempt to lecture anyone. I would say it is a case of the pot calling the kettle black... except I have made several good points in this thread while you, you conniving snake, have dodged every question posed to you.

    As far as I am concerned, your opinion is worth less than the piss pot families of old would bring to the tanner!
     
  9. Trooper Secular Sanity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,784
    Shouldn't a part of any such campaign also inform people of their risks and prevention strategies?

    "The problem with a campaign like that is that it feeds the “blame the victim” mentality. One of the biggest problems in rape culture is that many rape victims blame themselves, which means that they don’t press charges."—common feminist answer

    Are you willing to take that risk, Tiassa? Can you guarantee that this approach will reduce the number of rapes without the need to inform people of their risks or provide them with prevention strategies?
     
  10. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,270
    Few people consider or factor in their relatives when deciding on their security measures.

    For example, would you factor in your brother in law raping your wife when you decide on what security measures you are going to take?

    I live in a regular suburb, close to the city. It isn't like the inner-city suburbs one would find in the US, for example, but one where I am about 10 minutes out of city by car if all the lights are red, but it is a suburb where we all have big yards, local school, lots of parks, running and walking tracks, as well as bike paths that go on for miles.

    People do not keep guard dogs here. Not only are such dogs dangerous, especially if you have children, but if someone enters my property legally and is injured by a dog, or if my children were injured or killed by such dogs, I would be liable, and criminally so, for keeping or maintaining dangerous dogs. This expectation that I am somehow responsible for my supposed inadequate home security and as such, share the blame for being raped and that I should have gone back and seen where I failed, because my money allowed me to keep such dogs and my failure to do so meant that I shared some responsibility for my rape, is without any doubt, a form of victim blaming and offers excuses to rapist - along the lines of - 'well, she could have afforded guard dogs, but she didn't, so it's not all your fault'.

    What is reasonable for anyone who lives in a suburb is a fences, which I have, and I also have a front fence which is quite high, and a security gate at the front, which is also quite high. Quite a few in my street apply similar measures. I went above and beyond that by having a similar wall and security out-door 'door'/small gates with security pads on either side of my house as well, for anyone trying to access the back area of my property. As well as other security measures in my home as well (which few have where I live). This goes far beyond what most have in my suburb. Strangers would have a hard time breaking into my property. People who have visited my home on many many occasions would not, especially those who were around when we installed such measures years ago, and who used to visit and talk to us about it on many occasions.

    As I said, few people factor in their close relatives breaking and entering and bypassing security measures, when they install and build such measures. And no one would consider such measures as a form of rape prevention against one's own family members. This expectation that we are now required to maintain some kind of fortress and guard dogs as a measure of rape prevention shows just how moronic rape prevention ideology has become.
     
  11. Trooper Secular Sanity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,784
    Are you willing to take that risk? Can you guarantee that this approach will reduce the number of rapes without the need to inform people of their risks or provide them with prevention strategies?

    Answer the question, smart one.
     
  12. pjdude1219 The biscuit has risen Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,479
    why should anyone cave to any of your demands when you can't answer the simple question of how you address the vast majority of rapes your "rules" won't do diddly squat to prevent?
     
  13. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    You haven't posed any question that I have seen is worth answering - instead, you have pandered and meandered about, wandering from vague point to pointless irrelevance without ever touching on a useful idea or thought.
     
  14. Trooper Secular Sanity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,784
    It wasn't your fault, Bells. The criminal or moral responsibility should never be transferred to the victim but withholding information that may help keep people safe isn't right, either. There is middle ground between the two.
     
  15. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    *headdesk*

    And yet again you miss the point of what, if my quick estimate is correct, at least half the people in this thread have been trying to tell you - when you put the entire obligation to safety and protection from rape on the woman, and then give them the third degree if they are raped, you are making THEM feel and appear to be at fault.
     
  16. Trooper Secular Sanity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,784
    Who in hell made you a moderator, huh? Everyone gets that, you idiot, but this is not what most feminists are proposing. The "tell men to stop raping" campaign is great. Nobody in their right mind wants rapists to flourish. Change the world, if you can, little guy, but what do we do in the meantime? Feminists feel too uncomfortable with any rape prevention strategies being directed towards "potential" victims...and that's where the problem lies. Not providing the information IS irresponsible.
     
  17. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    I am not concerned with what "most" feminists are proposing... I am concerned with the ones in this thread that keep trying to lay blame at the feet of the victim, saying such things as "you didn't do enough" or "you should have done more".
     
  18. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,000
    What about people who didnt lock ther door an someone simply walked in an raped 'em... do you thank they "shoud have done more"... ie... used "good common sense" an locked ther door.???
     
  19. iceaura Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    30,994
    As others have noted in other discussions, Canadians in many large cities apparently do not lock their doors in general. Does that make them lacking in common sense? It apparently does not make them more likely to be raped, but less. How about the recommendation that the US adopt the apparently better functioning Canadian rape prevention methods - would that be irresponsible?

    Rape prevention would involve changing "the world". You are asking what we should do in the absence of, or while waiting for, effective rape prevention efforts. It's a reasonable question, as long as the answers are not mistaken for the rape prevention you are not addressing.
    Nobody is not providing information, or recommending refusal to provide information, or denying information to anyone. This was true the first time you posted that bullshit, and every time since. You have been corrected in that matter several times now.

    Never said anything like that - which is a response I could just copy and use for every single response you have posted here. Is English your native language, or what is your problem reading my posts?
     
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2014
  20. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,000
    To be clear... are you suggestin that ther woud be less rape in America if people left ther doors unlocked.???
     
  21. Trooper Secular Sanity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,784
    Because that is what's happening, iceaura. Google around.

    Goodnight, iceaura.
     
  22. pjdude1219 The biscuit has risen Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,479
    quit lying. you have personally attacked victims of sexual assault. when the victims your supposedly try to protect tell you your wrong shouldn't that tell you something? oh but that's right your better than us you followed the rules.
     
  23. Trooper Secular Sanity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,784
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page