QM + GR = black holes cannot exist

Discussion in 'Physics & Math' started by RJBeery, Sep 24, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    Once again, nothing that comes within 1.5 Schwarzchild radius of the EH, will never escape the BH's clutches, for the reasons given.
    What interests you about me is nether here nor there, nor do I really care.
    What I have stated is accepted mainstream cosmology.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. RJBeery Natural Philosopher Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,222
    Hi Bruce. I've identified your problem.

    By claiming that Galileo is "right" what you are maintaining is that fall times are independent of mass. In other words, from 10 meters above the Earth:
    A golf ball would take 1.4 seconds
    A bowling ball would take 1.4 seconds
    A car would take 1.4 seconds
    A building would take 1.4 seconds
    The moon would take 1.4 seconds
    The sun would take 1.4 seconds
    A black hole would take 1.4 seconds

    I'm confident that between my identification of your logical fallacy and the mathematical analysis I provided in the other thread you'll be able to reconcile this problem on your own.

    Good luck!
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543

    And of course I'm speaking of at and within the Schwarzchild radius, so why you happen to claim ,<c is beyond comprehension.
    I am not and was not speaking of outside the Schwarzchild radius.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. RJBeery Natural Philosopher Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,222
    False. You said
    1.5 Schwarzschild radius is at "at and within the Schwarzschild radius". The area outside of R_s but less than 1.5*R_s can be escaped with a velocity < c.
     
  8. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543

    Again, the original statement by RJBeery is totally wrong.
    Nothing, within the Photon sphere [1.5 Schwarzchild radius] will ever escape the BH's clutches.
     
  9. brucep Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,098
    From you they're nonexistent. Cranks get to have it that way since they're never wrong.
     
  10. RJBeery Natural Philosopher Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,222
    This is false. You are confusing "no stable orbits" with "no escape". I won't point this out to you again.
     
  11. RJBeery Natural Philosopher Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,222
    Bruce, did you see my post where I identified your problem?
     
  12. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    http://casa.colorado.edu/~ajsh/orbit.html

    http://casa.colorado.edu/~ajsh/approach.html

    The photon sphere

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    1.5 Schwarzschild radii from the singularity.

    This is the location of the innermost unstable circular orbit. To maintain circular orbit at this radius requires going at the speed of light. In particular light itself can orbit the black hole in circular orbits at this radius. For this reason, this location is sometimes called the photon sphere.

    Inside 1.5 Schwarzschild radii, no circular orbits exist, stable or unstable: all free fall orbits fall into the black hole. To maintain orbit inside 1.5 Schwarzschild radii without falling in, it would be necessary to keep rockets constantly on burn.

    Photons do not orbit in circles at the horizon, just skimming the surface. The place where photons orbit in circles is the photon sphere, at 1.5 Schwarzschild radii. Photons emitted at the horizon fall in; except that if a photon is emitted exactly vertically outward exactly at the horizon, then it will hover at the horizon, not moving at all.

    http://casa.colorado.edu/~ajsh/singularity.html
     
  13. Layman Totally Internally Reflected Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,001
    News flash! Scientist recently rediscovered that there is a black hole at the center of almost every galaxy! The one in the Milky Way was discovered by having enough mass to be sufficient to be a suppermassive black hole by the orbits of other stars, and this massive object is not even visible being in our own galaxy!
     
  14. RJBeery Natural Philosopher Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,222
    Yes, you've identified the difference, but we aren't talking about free-falling. We're talking about theoretically escaping the black hole, under acceleration if needed, which is possible > R_s. What do you think the R_s signifies if the "actual" sphere-of-no-return is the photon sphere?
     
  15. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543


    No, I'm saying nothing will ever escape a BH that wanders inside the photon sphere.
    Now I'm not sure how much pedant or crank nonsense you may want to apply to gain credibility,
     
  16. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    but the fact remains, unless something can obtain "c"it will never escape.
     
  17. RJBeery Natural Philosopher Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,222
    This is false. You apparently don't understand the difference between a free-fall and an object under acceleration. Ask one of your peers, I simply can't continue to tell you that you're wrong unless you consider the possibility that you are.
     
  18. Layman Totally Internally Reflected Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,001
    By definition the Schwarzschild radius is the distance from the center of a black hole where the escape velocity becomes greater than "c".
     
  19. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    The EH signifies the parameter within which nothing including light escapes.
    The photon sphere signifies the parameter at which light can orbit the BH.
    Light can still escape within this parameter
     
  20. RJBeery Natural Philosopher Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,222
    So a rocketship able to travel at .99999c in a radial escape path from the black hole could not penetrate the photon sphere?
     
  21. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543

    I understand the difference fairly well. If you can show me how something within the photon sphere [other then light] that can accelerate to "c" then I'll rethink the situation.
     
  22. RJBeery Natural Philosopher Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,222
    You don't need to accelerate to "c" to escape the photon sphere. You only need to accelerate to sqrt(2)c. You would need to accelerate to "c" at the event horizon.
     
  23. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543


    Light emitted at just near but outside the EH, will arc back and secumb to the BH, unless emitted directly radially away....Even then it never escapes but appears to hover forever never getting away and never secumbing.

    Back later, I must be off...
    I'm listening.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page