Lambert-Charlier Hierarchical Cosmology

Discussion in 'Alternative Theories' started by FOLZONI, Sep 24, 2014.

  1. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    No, again you are wrong. [1]The variance in the CMBR information associated with spacetime expansion.
    [2] The observed cosmological redshift over large scales.......
    [3] The observed acceleration in the expansion rate which means some DE component.

    Sorry ol matey, no cigar yet.



    PS: Have you at least undergone peer review of your crazy ideas yet?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. JukriS Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    210
    Redshifted light is not from expanding space!

    is just moving "in" space which is nothing!

    redshifted expanding light is from expandins stars which is faraway from here!

    You did not knew that?

    Love
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,888
    Really!?!
    Really!?!
    Why would light from expandins stars be redshifted!?!
    No! How are we suppose to know what you madeup!?!
    Peace, doves and crystals.
     
    paddoboy likes this.
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543

    Now you are being silly Hans.
     
  8. JukriS Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    210
    Old expanding light is redshifted because expanding photons recyvling expanding movement with each other!

    New expanding light / photons moving little bit faster that old expanding phoyons, but because expanding photons interactive with each other, new expanding photons pushing more speed for old expandins photons which moving same or about same direction!

    i csn explain why and how expandingvphotons recycling expanding movement!

    old redshifted light prove that also light expanding! So, space dont expanding!

    Eternal Love
     
  9. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    The standard cosmological model of the Universe/spacetime, tells us that spacetime evolved from a Singularity we call the BB.
    The four main pillars supporting the BB concept are as follows....
    [1] Observed expansion of spacetime. [mentally reversing that, we arrive back at the BB and the Singularity of spacetime.
    [2] The CMBR at the correct predicted 2.7K
    [3] Abundance of lighter Elements
    [4] Galactic formation at the tiny uniform variations in the CMBR.

    The two other theories speculated in the fifties as the cause of the Universe and in competition with the BB, were "Steady State" and Oscillating theory.
    The discovery of the CMBR spelt the death knell for both, and the rise to prominence of the BB.
    It now ranks with Abiogenesis, Evolution, SR, GR as scientific theories near certain in their applications and the way they each support each other.
     
  10. JukriS Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    210
    Space expanding inflation way it is wrong idea!

    all visible universe galaxys centre supermassive concentrstions born about same time and this concentration born "in" space which been there already and is eternal and infinity place!

    also this supermassive concentration was already faraway from each other, so space did nit have expanding at all!

    also this denser shich pushing out from galaxys centre supemassive expanding concentration get some outside movement / pushing force and start expanding extremyly way / inflation way " in" space which is nothing and thats way born new stars and slso, of course, new expanding nucleus of stoms shich recycling expanding movemdnt all a time!

    Eternal Love
     
  11. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543

    What we need to add to the above is that we see the Universe/spacetime expanding over larger scales by the cosmological red shifting of light.
    But over galactic sizes and local groups of galaxies, the mass/energy density is such, that these regions are "decoupled"from this overall observed expansion, and we observe cosmological blue shifting of light.
     
  12. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
  13. JukriS Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    210
    i just wonder, if Hubble himselfs get the idea for expanding nucleus of atoms which recycling expanding movement?

    Hubbble tell for everybody that light expanding and new light get old photons moving faster and thats why we post see old light is redshifted!

    now you already understund, space dont expanding, because nobody ever try to explain anything with expanding space!

    Eternal Love
     
  14. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543

    Hubble was a lot smarter then you....He was a scientist, an astronomer...He did not write fairy tales.
    He showed evidence that spacetime expands.
    Now we know it accelerates in that expansion rate.
    It's called science Hans...We have evidence for it.
    Why not tell the world that Hubble was wrong, and the whole scientific comminity for a 100 years.
    Why not get your nonsense peer reviewed. ?
    Why are you in the Alternative section.?
     

Share This Page