I've been the target of trolls since the day I started this thread, it is not easy to keep one's temper. Sorry to offend you, mate, it's been good chatting. How would you respond to people who continuously bash your work while not even reading it? It's rude and disrespectful, and I am not perfect so I can let myself bite back at times.
Your hypothesis that you claim as "fact", your derision of most of mainstream cosmology, your claiming to have a validated ToE, your refusal to accept anything to the contrary, paints you as the troll.
That must be where I saw it, lol. From the PDF describing the video, and also as mentioned in captions to your paper's graphics, there is a technique called the Wiener Filter reconstruction: From the PDF: "The observed distribution of galaxies in redshift space, the observed radial peculiar velocities of the small fraction of galaxies with accurately known distances, the in- ferred three-dimensional motions of all the galaxies from a Wiener Filter reconstruction, and the inferred density distribution from these motions. The details regarding all these steps are discussed in other publications. Our purpose here is to highlight the usefulness – the importance – of visual representations as an arm of this re- search enterprise." Can you explain what a Wiener Filter reconstruction is?
Wait, this explains it. http://www.nr.com/CS395T/lectures2008/19-WienerFiltering.pdf What I was wondering was about how much of the detail of the movie images from beyond the GA were "processed" images. If you are considering those to be "lensed" images, why are they so similar to the portion of the movie on our side of the GA?
Your scientific illiterate nonsense is disrespectful. You made this nonsense up, without any respect for the real science, so you can pretend you actually have something meaningful to say on the subject of cosmology. Now you're crying foul and whining about trolls.